Advertisement

Pharmaceutisch Weekblad

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 78–82 | Cite as

Evaluation of genotoxic risk of handling cytostatic drugs in clinical pharmacy practice

  • Ester P. Guinée
  • Gert H. Beuman
  • Geja Hageman
  • Irene J. Welle
  • Jos C. S. Kleinjans
Articles

Abstract

The genotoxic risk of handling antineoplastic drugs was evaluated in fifteen women preparing chemotherapeutics in the Pharmacy Department of the University Hospital Maastricht. Twenty nurses of the same hospital, who were not exposed to cytostatics, acted as controls. Endogenous exposure to antineoplastic drugs was assessed by determination of urine mutagenicity, as well as by analysis of urinary methotrexate levels. As genotoxicological end-points, sister chromatid exchanges and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus point mutations were studied in peripheral lymphocytes obtained via venous puncture. No differences in urine mutagenic activity, in sister chromatid exchange frequencies and in hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase point mutation frequencies between exposed and non-exposed groups were detected. Higher sister chromatid exchange frequency was observed in smokers as compared to non-smokers.

Keywords

Antineoplastic agents Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase Mutagenicity tests Pharmacies, hospital Urine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anonymous. Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to human; chemicals, industrial processes and industries associated with cancer in humans. IARC Monogr 1982;1(Suppl 4).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falck K, Gröhn P, Sorsa M, Vainio H, Heinonen E, Holsti LR. Mutagenicity in urine of nurses handling cytostatic drugs. Lancet 1979;1:1250–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos RP, Leenars AO, Theuws JLG, Henderson PT. Mutagenicity of urine from nurses handling cytostatic drugs, influence of smoking. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1982;50:359–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson RW, Puckett WH, Dana WJ, Nguyen TV, Theiss JC, Matney TS. Risk of handling injectable antineoplastic agents. Am J Hosp Pharm 1982;39:1881–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waksvik H, Klepp O, Brøgger A. Chromosome analysis of nurses handling cytostatic drugs. Cancer Treat Rep 1981;65:601–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staiano N, Gallelli JF, Adamson RH. Lack of mutagenic activity in urine from hospital pharmacists admixing anti-tumor drugs. Lancet 1981;1:615–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen TV, Theiss JC, Matney TS. Exposure of pharmacy personnel to antineoplastic drugs. Cancer Res 1982;42:4792–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pesce MA, Bodourian SH. Evaluation of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay procedure for quantitation of methotrexate. Ther Drag Monitor 1986;8:115–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hageman G, Hermans R, Ten Hoor P, Kleinjans J. Mutagenicity of deep-frying fat, and evaluation of urine mutagenicity after consumption of fried potatoes. Food Chem Toxicol 1990;28:75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maron DM, Ames BN. Revised methods for theSalmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 1983;113:173–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tuffnell PC, Gannon MT, Dong A, DeBoer G, Erlichman C. Limitations of urinary mutagen assays for monitoring occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986;43:344–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kleinjans JCS, Janssen YMW, Van Agen B, Hageman GJ, Schreurs JGM. Genotoxicity of coal fly ash, assessedin vitro inSalmonella typhimurium and human lymphocytes, andin vivo in an occupationally exposed population. Mutat Res 1989;224:127–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kilbey BJ, Legator M, Nichols W, Ramel C. Handbook of mutagenicity test procedures. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lange BJ, Prantner JE. The emergence of 6-thioguanine-resistant lymphocytes in pediatric cancer patients. Mutat Res 1982;94:487–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Everson RB, Ratcliffe JM, Falck PM, Hoffman DM, Watanabe AS. Detection of low levels of urinary mutagen excretion by chemotherapy workers which was not related to occupational drug exposures. Cancer Res 1985;45:6487–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolmodin-Hedman B, Hartwig P, Sorsa M, Falck K. Occupational handling of cytostatic drugs. Arch Toxicol 1983;54:25–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibson JF, Gomperts D, Hedwordth-Whitty RB. Mutagenicity of urine from nurses handling cytotoxic drugs. Lancet 1984;1:100–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norppa H, Sorsa M, Vainio H, et al. Increased sister chromatid exchange frequencies in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic drugs. Scand J Work Environ Health 1980;6:299–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stiller A, Obe G, Riedel L, Riehm H, Kappes C. Mutagens in human urine. Test with human peripheral lymphocytes. Mutat Res 1982;97:437–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nikula E, Kiviniitty K, Leisti J, Taskinen PJ. Chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic agents. Scand J Work Environ Health 1984;10:71–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benhamou S, Pot-Depriun J, Sancho-Garnier H, Chouroulinkov I. Sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic agents. Int J Cancer 1988;41:350–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Albertini RJ, Sullivan LM, Berman JK, et al. Mutagenicity monitoring in humans by autoradiographic assay for mutant T-lymphocytes. Mutat Res 1988;204:481–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chrysostomou A, Morley AA, Seshadri R. Mutation frequency in nurses and pharmacists working with cytotoxic drugs. Aust NZ J Med 1984;14:831–4.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vijayalaxmi, Evans HJ. Measurement of spontaneous and X-irradiation-induced 6-thioguanine-resistant human blood lymphocytes using a T-cell cloning technique. Mutat Res 1984;125:87–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amnéus H, Sjögren B, Zettenberg G. Resistance to 6-thioguanine in spontaneously cycling and in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral lymphocytes. Mutat Res 1984;139:41–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Dutch Association for Advancement of Pharmacy 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ester P. Guinée
    • 1
  • Gert H. Beuman
    • 2
  • Geja Hageman
    • 1
  • Irene J. Welle
    • 1
  • Jos C. S. Kleinjans
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Health ScienceUniversity of LimburgMD Maastrichtthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Pharmacy and ToxicologyUniversity Hospital MaastrichtBX Maastrichtthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations