Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 98, Issue 5, pp 313–324 | Cite as

Characterisation of energy-dependent efflux of imazalil and fenarimol in isolates of Penicillium italicum with a low, medium and high degree of resistance to DMI-fungicides

  • J. Guan
  • J. C. Kapteyn
  • A. Kerkenaar
  • M. A. De Waard
Articles

Abstract

Differential accumulation of [14C]imazalil and [14C]fenarimol by germlings of wild-type and DMI-resistant isolates ofPenicillium italicum was studied at various pH values. At pH 7 and 8 the low-resistant isolate E300−3 accumulated 22% and 35%, respectively, less imazalil than the wild-type isolate W5. Imazalil accumulation at pH 5 and 6 was similar. Isolate E300−3 also accumulated less fenarimol as compared with the wild-type isolate. This difference was much more obvious than for imazalil and was observed at all pH values tested. Differences in accumulation of both imazalil and fenarimol between low (E300−3), medium (H17) and high resistant (I33) isolates were not observed. These results suggest that decreased accumulation of DMIs is responsible for a low level of resistance only and that additional mechanisms of resistance might operate in isolates with a medium and high degree of resistance. With all isolates fenarimol accumulation was energy-dependent. This was not obvious for imazalil.

The wild-type and DMI-resistant isolates had a similar plasma membrane potential as determined with the probe [14C]tetraphenylphosphonium bromide ([14C]TPP+). Various test compounds, among which ATPase inhibitors, ionophoric antibiotics and calmodulin antagonists, affected the accumulation of [14C]TPP+, [14C]imazalil and [14C]fenarimol. No obvious correlation between the effects of the test compounds on accumulation levels of the fungicides and [14C]TPP+ could be observed. These results indicate that the plasma membrane potential does not mediate the efflux of DMI fungicides byP. italicum.

Additional keywords

ATPase inhibitors calmodulin antagonists fenarimol imazalil ionophoric antibiotics sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitors tetraphenylphosphonium bromide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradley, G., Juranka, P.F. & Ling, V., 1988. Mechanism of multidrug resistance. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 948: 87–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brent, K.J. & Hollomon, D.W., 1988. Risk of resistance against sterol biosynthesis inhibitors in plant protection. In: D. Berg & M. Plempel (Eds), Sterol biosynthesis inhibitors. Pharmaceutical and agrochemical aspects. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 332–346.Google Scholar
  3. Damper, P.D. & Epstein, W., 1981. Role of the membrane potential in bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 20: 803–808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deas, A.H.B., 1986. Triadimefon: relationship between metabolism and fungitoxicity. Pesticide Science 17:69–70.Google Scholar
  5. De Waard, M.A. & Gieskes, S.A., 1977. Characterization of fenarimol-resistant mutants ofAspergillus nidulans. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 83: 177–188.Google Scholar
  6. De Waard, M.A. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1979. Mechanism of resistance to fenarimol inAspergillus nidulans. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 10: 210–229.Google Scholar
  7. De Waard, M.A. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1984. Differential accumulation of fenarimol by a wild-type isolate and fenarimol-resistant isolates ofPenicillium italicum. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 90: 143–153.Google Scholar
  8. De Waard, M.A. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1987. Inhibition of energy-dependent efflux of the fungicide fenarimol byAspergillus nidulans. Experimental Mycology 11: 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. De Waard, M.A. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1988. Accumulation of SBI fungicides in wild-type and fenarimol-resistant isolates ofPenicillium italicum. Pesticide Science 22: 371–382.Google Scholar
  10. De Waard, M.A. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1990. Stepwise development of laboratory resistance to DMI fungicides inPenicillium italicum. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 96: 321–329.Google Scholar
  11. De Waard, M.A., Groeneweg, H. & Van Nistelrooy, J.G.M., 1982. Laboratory resistance to fungicides which inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis inPenicillium italicum. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 88: 99–112.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenberg, E.S., Mandel, L.J., Kaback, H.R. & Miller, M.H., 1984. Quantitative association between electrical potential across the cytoplasmic membrane and early gentamycine uptake and killing inStaphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology 157: 863–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Endicott, J.A. & Ling, L., 1989. The biochemistry of P-glycoprotein mediated multi-drug resistance. Annual Review of Biochemistry 58: 137–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilman, S. & Saunders, V.A., 1986. Accumulation of gentamicin byStaphylococcus aureus: The role of the transmembrane electrical potential. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 17:37–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottesman, M. & Pastan, I., 1988. The multidrug transporter, a double-edged sword. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263: 12163–12166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan, J., Kerkenaar, A. & De Waard, M.A., 1989. Effects of imazalil on sterol composition of sensitive and DMI-resistant isolates ofPenicillium italicum. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 95 (Supplement 1): 73–86.Google Scholar
  17. Hitchcock, C.A., Barrett-Bee, K.J. & Russell, N.J., 1986. The lipid composition and permeability to azole and polyene resistant mutant ofCandida albicans. Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 25: 29–37.Google Scholar
  18. Kapteyn, J.C., Pillmoor, J.B. & De Waard, M.A., 1992. Biochemical mechanisms involved in selective fungitoxicity of two sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitors, prochloraz and an experimental triazole. Accumulation and metabolism studies. Pesticide Science. In press.Google Scholar
  19. Kashket, E.R., 1985. The proton motive force in bacteria: a critical assessment of methods. Annual Review of Microbiology 39: 219–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kato, T., 1986. Sterol-biosynthesis in fungi, a target for broad spectrum fungicides. In: G. Haug & H. Hoffmann (Eds), Chemistry of plant protection I. Sterol biosynthesis inhibitors and antifeeding compounds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  21. Köller, W. & Scheinpflug, H., 1987. Fungal resistance to sterol biosynthesis inhibitors: a new challenge. Plant Disease 171: 1066–1074.Google Scholar
  22. Krämer, W., Berg, D. & Köller, W., 1987. Chemical synthesis and fungicidal resistance, In: M.G. Ford, D.W. Hollomon, B.P.S. Khambay & R.M. Sawicki (Eds), Combating resistance to xenobiotics — Biological and chemical approaches. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
  23. Leroux, P., Gredt, M. & Fritz, R., 1976. Similitudes et différences entre les modes d'action de l'imazalile, du triadimefon, du triarimol et de la triforine. Phytiatrie-Phytopharmacie 25: 317–334.Google Scholar
  24. Lolkema, J.S., Hellingwerf, K.J. & Konings, W.N., 1982. The effect of ‘probe binding’ on the quantitative determination of the proton-motive force in bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 681: 85–94.Google Scholar
  25. Lolkema, J.S., Abbing, A., Hellingwerf, K.J. & Konings, W.N., 1983. The transmembrane electrical potential inRhodopseudomonas sphaeroides determined from the distribution of tetraphenylphosphonium after correction for its binding to cell components. European Journal of Biochemistry 130: 287–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Perlin, D.S., Brown, G.L. & Hafer, J.E., 1988. Membrane potential defect in hygromycin B-resistantpmal mutants ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263: 18118–18122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Portillo, F. & Gancedo, C., 1985. Mitochondrial resistance to miconazole inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and General Genetics 199: 493–499.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, F.D. & Köller, W., 1990. The expression of resistance ofUstilago avenae to sterol demethylation inhibitor triadimenol is an induced response. Phytopathology 80: 584–590.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, F.R., Rodrigues, R.J. & Parks, L.W., 1983. Requirement for a second sterol biosynthetic mutation for viability of a sterol C-14 demethylation defect mutant inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology 155: 64–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vanden Bossche, H., Marichal, P., Correas, J., Bellens, D., Moereels, H. & Janssen, P.A.J., 1990. Mutation in cytochrome P-450-dependent C-14 demethylation results in decreased affinity for azole antifungals. Biochemical Society Transactions 18: 56–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Tuyl, J.M., 1977. Genetics of fungal resistance to systemic fungicides. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 77–2.Google Scholar
  32. Walsh, R.L. & Sisler, H.D., 1982. A mutant ofUstilago maydis deficient in sterol C-14 demethylation, characteristics and sensitivity to inhibitors of ergosterol biosynthesis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 18: 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Warth, A.D., 1977. Mechanism of resistance ofSaccharomyces baillii to benzoic, sorbic and other weak acids used as food preservatives. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 43: 215–230.Google Scholar
  34. Watson, P.F., Rose, M.E. & Kelly, S.L., 1988. Isolation and characterization of ketoconazole resistant mutants ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 26: 153–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weete, J.D., 1986. Comparison of responses by fungi sensitive and tolerant to propiconazole inAspergillus ochraceus andMucor rouxii. 3C-06, Abstract of 6th International Congress on Pesticide Chemistry, IUPAC, Ottawa.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Guan
    • 1
  • J. C. Kapteyn
    • 1
  • A. Kerkenaar
    • 2
  • M. A. De Waard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhytopathologyWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Denka International B.V.Barneveldthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations