A new approach to sterilization conditions. The IMO concept
- 31 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
The sterilization requirements for medical/pharmaceutical applications are traditionally based on an extensive overkill. In the past few years, however, an evolution towards bioburden related sterilization processes has been started (F0 theory). Especially manufacturers of large volume parenterals have — forced by the thermolability of the product — contributed to this development.
In this paper both philosophies are combined, resulting in a concept in which the bacteriological and physical bases of the sterilization process are mathematically related by using the F0 theory and by introducing an Imaginary Micro-Organism (imo). Theimo concept provides the opportunity for anyone in the field of sterilization to raise the quality control level, which can be achieved by:
-
selecting optimum sterilization conditions without performing pre-sterilization counts;
-
step by step introducing the pre-sterilization count which results in even more favourable sterilization conditions.
Keywords
Public Health Internal Medicine Quality Control Large Volume Control LevelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Akers, M.J. (1979)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 33, 372–383.Google Scholar
- Akers, M.J., I.A. Attia andK.E. Avis (1978)Pharm. Techn., May, 31–35;Ibidem (1979)J. Parenteral Drug. Assoc. 33, 195–202.Google Scholar
- Alderton, G., andN. Snell (1963)Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 10, 139–143;Ibidem (1969)Science 163, 1212–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (1980)Aami st i. Arlington (usa).Google Scholar
- Beal, R.W. (1980)Anaesth. Intens. Care 8, 172–177.Google Scholar
- Beck, W.C. (1978)Hepatitis controversy, AAMI, Arlington (USA), 55–58.Google Scholar
- Bowie, J.H. (1955)Pharm. J., June 11, 473–476.Google Scholar
- Bowman, F.W. (1969)J. Pharm. Sciences 58, 1301–1307.Google Scholar
- Caputo, R.A., T.E. Odlaug, R.L. Wilkinson andC. C. Mascoli (1979)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 33, 214–221.Google Scholar
- Cerf, D. (1977)J. Appl. Bacteriol. 42, 1–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cook, A.M., andR.J. Gilbert (1968a)J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 20, 626–629;Ibidem (1968b)J. Food Technol. 3, 295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Costin, I.D., andJ. Grico (1974)Zentr. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., Abt. I Orig. A 227, 483–521.Google Scholar
- Department of Health and Social Security (1980)Health Technical Memorandum, nr. 10. London.Google Scholar
- Frieben, W.R., R.A. Kreiger, D.L. Juberg andR.M. Enzinger (1978)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 32, 249–257.Google Scholar
- Halleck, F.E., S. Mizuba, B.S. Zimmer andJ. Woodrow (1979)Medical Instrumentation 13, 168–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han, Y.W. (1975)Can. J. Microbiol. 21, 1464–1467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoskins, H.T. (1979)J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 31, 101.Google Scholar
- Irving, A.D. (1980)Int. Roy. Coll. Surg. Edinburgh, 25, 23–25.Google Scholar
- Kelsey, J.C. (1958)Lancet I, 306–309;Ibidem (1961)J. Clin. Pathol. 14, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kereluk, K. (1976) In:Quality in Microbiology (Prier, J.E., J. Bartola andH. Friedman, Eds.). University Park Press, Baltimore-London-Tokyo, 25–39.Google Scholar
- Konold, F., U. Ullmann, C.P. Schrader andG. Kieninger. (1974)Deut. Med. Woch.schr. 99, 1009–1013.Google Scholar
- Korczynski, M.S. (1980)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 34, 277–285.Google Scholar
- Korczynski, M.S., C.L. Peterson andC.C. Loshbaugh (1974)Bull. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 28, 270–277.Google Scholar
- Lee, C.H., T.J. Montville andA.J. Sinskey (1979)App. Environ. Microbiol. 37, 1113–1117.Google Scholar
- Lim, J.C. (1979)Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 36, 1202–1204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marshall, B.J., W.G. Murrell (1970)J. Appl. Bact. 33, 103–120.Google Scholar
- Myers, R.B. (1978)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 32, 216–225.Google Scholar
- Parenteral Drug Association (1978)Inc. Techn. Monogr. no. I, 1–35.Google Scholar
- Ph. Ned. Ed. VIII (1978) 344–347.Google Scholar
- Propper Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1980) 20th ed.Excerpts from US Pharm. National Formulary. Long Island City (USA).Google Scholar
- Puleo, J.R., M.S. Faverno, G.S. Oxborrow andC.M. Herring (1975)Appl. Microbiol. 30, 786–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reich, R.R., J.E. Whitbourne andA.W. Mcdaniel (1979)J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 33, 228–234.Google Scholar
- Report of the Working Group on Sterilizing Dose.aami, Arlington (usa) (1976) Meeting of theaami Subcommittee on radiation sterilizing dose.Google Scholar
- Riv (1980)Steriliseran en Steriliteit. Handleidingen Serie no. 1, Bilthoven.Google Scholar
- Seyfarth, H. (1975)Zentr. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., Abt. I Orig. B 160, 432–442.Google Scholar
- Smith, G.M., I.J. Pelug andP.A. Chapman (1976)Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32, 257–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spicher, G. (1973)Zentr. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., Abt. I Orig. A 224, 527–553.Google Scholar
- Spicher, G., andJ. Peters (1978)Zentr. Bakteriol. Parasitenk., Abt. I Orig. B 167, 63–82.Google Scholar
- Wallhäusser, K.H. (1980)Pharm. Ind. 42, 917–925.Google Scholar
- who (1973) Expert Committee on Biological StandardsWHO/BS/73.1062. WHO/Pharm/73.474.Google Scholar
- Wolff, A. (1975)Deut. Apotheker-Ztg. 115, 247–251.Google Scholar