Advertisement

Evaluation of a new selective medium forCampylobacter pylori

  • J. C. Dent
  • C. A. M. McNulty
Article

Abstract

Contaminating bacteria from the oropharynx and bacteria that colonise the stomachs of patients with a high gastric pH impede the isolation ofCampylobacter pylori from gastric biopsy specimens. Commercially available selective supplements are inhibitory to this organism and therefore a specific selective medium is needed for isolation. Potential selective agents were evaluated for their activity against 97 strains ofCampylobacter pylori. A modification of Skirrow's medium was developed; cefsulodin (5 mg/l) was substituted for polymyxin, and amphotericin B (5 mg/l) was added to inhibitCandida spp., a common contaminant of the stomach. No strains ofCampylobacter pylori were inhibited by theCampylobacter pylori selective medium and it supported the growth of all strains compared with the biopsy urease test and Gram stained smear. Colonies were slightly larger and more easily recognised on the new medium compared with those grown on chocolate blood agar. This medium greatly improves the isolation ofCampylobacter pylori and could be used alone, without a non-selective medium.

Keywords

Amphotericin Biopsy Specimen Selective Medium Blood Agar Polymyxin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atherton, S. T., White, D. J. Stomach as a source of bacteria colonising respiratory tract during artificial ventilation. Lancet 1987, i: 968–969.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drasar, B. S., Shiner, M., McLeod, G. M. Studies on the intestinal flora. Gastroenterology 1969, 56: 72–79.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stockbrugger, R. W., Cotton, P. B., Eugenides, N., Bartholomew, B. A., Hill, M. J., Walters, C. L. Intragastric nitrities, nitrosamines, and bacterial overgrowth during cimetidine treatment. Gut 1982, 23: 1048–1054.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodwin, C. S., Blincow, E. D., Warren, J. R., Waters, T. E., Sanderson, C. R., Easton, L. Evaluation of cultural techniques for isolatingCampylobacter pyloridis from endoscopic biopsies of gastric mucosa. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1985, 38: 1127–1131.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lambert, T., Megraud, F., Gerbaud, G., Courvalin, P. Susceptibility ofCampylobacter pyloridis to 20 antimicrobial agents. Journal of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1986, 30: 510–511.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krajden, S., Bohnen, J., Anderson, J., Kempston, J., Fuska, M., Matlwo, A., Marcon, N., Haber, G., Kortan, P., Karmali, M., Corey, P., Petrea, C., Babida, C., Hayman, S. Comparison of selective and nonselective media for the recovery ofCampylobacter pylori from antral biopsies. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987, 25: 1117–1118.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodwin, C. S., Blake, P., Blincow, E. The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of antibiotics and anti-ulcer agents againstCampylobacter pyloridis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1986, 17: 309–314.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNulty, C. A. M., Dent, J. C., Wise, R. Susceptibility of clinical isolates ofCampylobacter pyloridis to 11 antimicrobial agents. Journal of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1985, 28: 837–838.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 1938, 38: 732–748.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNulty, C. A. M., Dent, J. C. Rapid identification ofCampylobacter pylori by preformed enzymes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987, 25: 1683–1686.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman, P. S., Krieg, N. R., Smibert, R. M. Studies of the microaerophilic nature ofCampylobacter fetus subsp.jejuni. 1: Physiological aspects of enhanced aerotolerance. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1979, 25: 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lior, H., Johnson, W. H. Catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities inCampylobacter species. In: Pearson, A. D., Skirrow, M. B., Lior, H., Rowe, B. (ed.): Campylobacter III. Public Health Laboratory Service, London, 1985, p. 226–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Dent
    • 1
  • C. A. M. McNulty
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Health LaboratoryGloucestershire Royal HospitalGloucesterUK

Personalised recommendations