Experientia

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 326–332

The cold reading technique

  • D. L. Dutton
Multi-author Review Investigating the Paranormal

Summary

For many people, belief in the paranormal derives from personal experience of face-to-face interviews with astrologers, palm readers, aura and Tarot readers, and spirit mediums. These encounters typically involve cold reading, a process in which a reader makes calculated guesses about a client's background and problems and, depending on the reaction, elaborates a reading which seems to the client so uniquely appropriate that it carries with it the illusion of having been produced by paranormal means. The cold reading process is shown to depend initially on the Barnum effect, the tendency for people to embrace generalized personality descriptions as idiosyncratically their own. Psychological research into the Barnum effect is critically reviewed, and uses of the effect by a professional magician are described. This is followed by detailed analysis of the cold reading performances of a spirit medium. Future research should investigate the degree to which cold readers may have convinced themselves that they actually possess psychic or paranormal abilities.

Key words

Barnum effect cold reading psychic reading astrology paranormal reading palmistry spirit mediums 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dana, R. H., and Fouke, H. P., Barnum statements in report of psychological assessment. Psychol. Rep.44 (1979) 1215–1221.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delaney, J. G., and Woodyard, H. D., Effects of reading an astrological description on responding to a personality inventory. Psychol. Rep.,34 (1974) 1214.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickson, D. H. and Kelly, I. W., The ‘Barnum Effect’ in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychol. Rep.57 (1985) 367–382.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dies, R. R., Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: a further test of the ‘fallacy of personal validation.’ J. clin. Psych.28 (1972) 47–50.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dmitruk, V. M., Collins, R. W., and Clinger, D. L., The ‘Barnum Effect’ and acceptance of negative personal evaluation. J. Consult. Clin. Psych.41 (1973) 192–194.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fichten, C. S., and Sunerton, B., Popular horoscopes and the ‘Barnum Effect.’ J. Psych.114 (1983) 123–134.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forer, B. R., The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom study of gullibility. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.44 (1949) 118–123.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forer, B. R., Personal validation and the person. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 1214.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gergen, K. J., The social construction of self-knowledge, in: The Self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues. Ed. T. Mischel. Blackwell, Oxford 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halperin, K., Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., and Houston, B. K., Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of persoality feedback. J. appl. Psychol.61 (1976) 85–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyman, R., Cold reading: how to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Inquirer1 (1977) 18–37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hyman, R., The psychic reading, in: The Clever Hans Phenomenon, pp. 169–181. Eds R. A. Sebeok and R. Rosenthal. Academy of Sciences, New York 1981.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsen, W. W., Sr., The Mental Mysteries and Other Writings. Ed. W. W. Larsen, Jr. Genii Publishing, Los Angeles 1977.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manning, E. J., Personal validation: Personal validation: replication of Forer's study. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 181–182.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marks, D., Investigating the paranormal. Nature320 (1986) 119–124.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marks, D., and Kammann, R., The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marks, D., and McKellar, P., The nature and function of eidetic imagery. J. ment. Imagery6 (1982) 1–124.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marks, P. A., and Seemann, W., On the Barnum effect. Psychol. Rec.12 (1962) 203–208.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meehl, P. E., Wanted — a good cookbook. Am. Psychol.11 (1956), 262–272.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Randi, J., Cold reading revisited. Skeptical Inquirer3 (1979) 37–41.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosen, G., Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum effect: psychologist versus astrologer. J. Consult. clin. Psych.43 (1975) 95.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silverman, B. I., Studies of astrology. J. Psych.77 (1971) 141–149.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snyder, C. R., Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.42 (1974) 150.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Snyder, C. R., Why horoscopes are true: the effect of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. J. clin. Psychol.30 (1974) 577–580.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Snyder, C. R., and Larson, G. R., A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.38 (1972) 382–388.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Synder, C. R., Larsen, D. L., and Bloom, L. J., Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. J. clin. Psychol.32 (1976) 258–265.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., Effects of favorability, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. J. Consult. clin. Psych.44 (1976) 34–41.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., The P. T. Barnum effect. Psychol. Today8 (1975) 52–54.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tyson, G. A., Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: a review. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc.35 (1982) 186–188.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., and Stainton, N. R., Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Psychol. Rep.13 (1963) 831–834.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weisberg, P., Student acceptance of bogus personality interpretations differing in level of social desirability. Psychol. Rep.27 (1970) 743–746.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. Dutton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Fine ArtsUniversity of CanterburyChristchurch(New Zealand)

Personalised recommendations