Experientia

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 290–297 | Cite as

Astrology

  • S. Carlson
Multi-author Review Investigating the Paranormal

Summary

As a divinatory practice, astrology is without equal in both its colorful history and modern day popularity. Astrology has grown, over thousands of years, into a huge and ornate superstructure that lacks a central design. Although astrology has been dimly veiled by its occult mystique for centuries, the light of modern day inquiry has shown its substance to be mostly illusionary and revealed its foundation to be the shakiest possible: that of self-justification and anecdotal evidence. Despite the many claims of its practitioners and followers, extensive investigation has revealed astrology to be a great teetering monument to human gullibility.

Key words

Astrology horoscope natal chart Sun sign Mars effect planetary heredity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bennett, J., and Barth, J., Astronomics: A new approach to economics? J. Polit. Econ.81 (1973) 1473–1475.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlson, S., A double blind test of astrology. Nature318 (1985) 419–425.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark, V., Experimental astrology. Aquarian Agent1 (1961) 22–23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Comité Para, Nouvelles Breves43 (1976) 327–343.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Culver, R., and Ianna, P., The Gemini Syndrome: A Scientific Evaluation of Astrology, pp. 59–61. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Culver and Ianna,, capt. 7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Culver and Ianna,. pp. 143–147.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dean, G. A., The acceptance of astrological chart interpretations: A simple test of personality validation using reversed charts, Paper presented at the 2nd Astrol. Res. Conf. Inst. of Psychiatry, London. November 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dean, G. A., Can astrology predict e(xtraversion) and n(eutroticism)? Part 1. individual factors. Correlation5 (1986) 4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dean, G. A., Can astrology predict e(xtraversion) and n(euroticism)? Part 2. The whole Chart. Correlation5 (1986) 2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dean, G. A., Prepublication copy.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dean, G. A., Kelly, I. W., Rotton, J., and Saklofske, D. H., The guardian astrology study: A critique and reanalysis. The Skeptical Inquirer9 (1985) 327–338.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dean, G. A., Planets and personality extremes. Correlation, vol. 1, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dean, G. A., Recent advances in natal astrology. Analogic (1977) 28–31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dean, Recent advances in natal astrology. Analogic (1977), p. 29.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dean, Recent advances in natal astrology. Analogic (1977), pp 84–131.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dean, Recent advances in natal astrology. Analogic (1977), pp 131–134.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dean, M., The Astrology Game, pp. 247–251. Beauford Books, New York 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickson, D. H., and Kelly, I. W., The Barnum Effect in personality assessment. Psychol. Rep.57 (1985) 367–382.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eysenck, H., Astrology: science or superstition? Encounter (1979) 85.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gauquelin, M., The Cosmic Clocks, p. 84. Henery Regnery Company, Chicago 1967.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gauquelin, M., Cosmic Influences on Human Behavior. Garnstone Press, London 1974.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gauquelin, M., Dreams and Illusions of Astrology, p. 157. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gauquelin, M., Reappraisal of Planetary Heredity in 50,000 Family Data, New Birthdata Series, vol. 2. Laboratoire d'etude des relations entre rythmes cosmiques et psychophysiologiques, Paris 1984.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gauquelin, M., Profession and heredity experiments: Computer re-analysis and new investigation on the same material. Correlation4 (1984) 8–24.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gauquelin, M., and Gauquelin, F., Replication of the Planetary Effect in Heredity. Laboratoire d'etude des relations entre rythmes cosmiques et psychophysiologiques, Paris 1977.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gauquelin, M., and Gauquelin, F., Series B (Hereditary Experiment), vols. 1–6. Laboratoire d'etude des relations entre rythmes cosmiques et psychophysiologiques, Paris 1970.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gauquelin, M., and Gauquelin, F., Series C, vol. 1, part 2. Laboratoire d'etude des relations entre rythmes cosmiques et psychophysiologiques, Paris 1972.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jackson, M., Extraversion, neuroticism, and date of birth: A Southern Hemisphere A Study. J. Psychol.101 (1979) 197–198.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jackson, M., and Fiebert, M., Introversion-extroversion and Astrology. J. Psychol.105 (1980) 155–156.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kelly, I. W., Rotton, J., and Culver, R., The Moon was full and nothing happened: a review of studies on the Moon and human behavior and lunar beliefs. The Skeptical Inquirer10 (Winter 1985–86).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kurtz, P., Zelen, M., and Abell, G., Four-part report on the claimed ‘Mars effect’. The Skeptical Inquirer4 (Winter 1979–80) 19–63.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mayo, J., White, O., and Eysenck, H., An empirical study of the relation between astrological factors and personality. J. soc. Psychol.105 (1978) 229–236.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Niehenke, P., The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Astro-Psychol. Prob. vol. 1, pp. 33–37.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pawlik, K., and Buse, L., Self-attribution as a differential psychological moderating variable. Z. Sozialpsychol.10 (1979) 54–55.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raman, B., Hindu Predictive Astrology, p. 12. The India Book House, 1972.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rotton, J., and Kelly, I. W., Much ado about the full Moon: A meta-analysis of lunar-lunacy research. Psychol. Bull.97 (1985) 286–306.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saklofske, D., Kelly, I., and McKerracher, D., An empirical study of personality and astrological factors. J. Psychol.110 (1982) 275–280.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Silverman, B. I., Studies of astrology. J. Psychol.77 (1971) 141–149.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Veno, A., and Pamment, P., Astrological factors and personality: A southern hemisphere replication. J. Psychol.101 (1979) 73–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Carlson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LabsBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations