European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 151, Issue 10, pp 728–730 | Cite as

Predictive factors for the effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue therapy on the height of girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty

  • R. Brauner
  • F. Malandry
  • R. Rappaport
Endocrinology

Abstract

The factors influencing the final height of central precocious puberty patients treated with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues remain a critical issue. This study compares the predicted final height before and after GnRH analogue therapy to identify predictive factors for final height. Fourteen girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty were treated with a GnRH analogue. All had an active non-regressive form before therapy, full and permanent suppression of oestrogenic activity during therapy (duration >2 years, 3.1±0.3 years, mean ±SEM), and the pubertal pituitary-ovarian axis had normalized in all of them 1 year after the cessation of therapy. The mean predicted final height increased from 152±1.8 cm before therapy to 162.2±1.2 cm (P<0.01) at the last evaluation performed 4.5±0.3 years after the onset of therapy. The mean gain in predicted final height between the onset of therapy and the last evaluation was 10.2±1.1 cm. It was correlated with the following data recorded at the onset of therapy: bone age advance over chronological age (r=0.66,P<0.02), predicted final height at the onset of therapy (r=−0.76,P<0.001), and the difference between the target height and the predicted height at onset of therapy (r=0.76,P<0.001). We conclude that GnRH analogue therapy is more likely to improve final height prognosis in girls who initially present with a markedly advanced bone age and a great difference between their target and predicted heights. Both these parameters reflect the severity of the disease at diagnosis.

Key words

Puberty precocious Growth disorders LH-FSH releasing hormone therapy 

Abbreviations

FSH

follicle stimulating hormone

GnRH

gonadotrophin releasing hormone

LH

luteinizing hormone

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bayley N, Pinneau SR (1952) Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: revised for use with Greulich Pyle hand standards. J Pediatr 50:432–441Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boepple PA, Mansfield MJ, Crawford JD, Crigler JF Jr, Link K, Blizzard RM, Crowley WF Jr (1988) The effects of gonadal sex steroids and their reversible suppression on statural growth and skeletal maturation in girls with central precocious puberty. In: Disorders of human growth. Advances in research and treatment. Grave GD, Cassorea FG (eds) Thomas, Springfield, Ill, pp 312–328Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brauner R, Malandry F, Fontoura M, Prévot C, Souberbielle JC, Rappaport R (1991) Idiopathic central precocious puberty in girls as a model of the effect of plasma estradiol level on growth, skeletal maturation and plasma IGFI. Horm Res 36:116–120Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Comite F, Cassorea F, Barnes KM, Hench KD, Dwyer A, Skerda MC, Loriaux DL, Cutler GB Jr, Pescovitz OH (1986) Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue therapy for central precocious puberty: long term effect on somatic growth, bone maturation and predicted height. JAMA 255:2613–2616Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fontoura M, Brauner R, Prevot C, Rappaport R (1989) Precocious puberty in girls: early diagnosis of a slowly progressing variant. Arch Dis Child 64:1170–1176Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kreiter M, Burstein S, Rosenfield RL, Moll GW Jr, Cara JF, Youseffzadeh DK, Cuttler L, Levitsky LL (1990) Preserving adult height potential in girls with idiopathic true precocious puberty. J Pediatr 117:364–370Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manasco PK, Pescovitz OH, Feuillan PP, Hench KD, Barnes KM, Jones J, Hill SC, Loriaux DL, Cutler GB Jr (1988) Resumption of puberty after long term luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist treatment of central precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:368–372Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manasco PK, Pescovitz OH, Hill SC, Jones JM, Barnes KM, Hench KD, Loriaux DL, Cutler GB Jr (1989) Six-year results of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist treatment in children with LHRH-dependent precocious puberty. J Pediatr 115:105–108Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rappaport R, Fontoura M, Brauner R (1987) Treatment of central prococious puberty with an LHRH agonist (Buserelin): effect on growth and bone maturation after three years of treatment. Horm Res 28:149–154Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanner JM, Goldstein H, Whitehouse RH (1970) Standards for children's height at ages 2–9 years allowing for height of parents. Arch Dis Child 47:755–762Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zachmann M, Sobradillo B, Frank M, Frisch H, Prader A (1978) Bayley-Pinneau, Roche-Wainer-Thissen, and Tanner height predictions in normal children and in patients with various pathologic conditions. J Pediatr 93:749–755Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Brauner
    • 1
  • F. Malandry
    • 1
  • R. Rappaport
    • 1
  1. 1.Paediatric Endocrinology Unit and INSERM U. 30Faculté et Hopital Necker-Enfants MaladesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations