, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 245–268 | Cite as

Permeability of egg membranes

Water exchange through the egg membranes of fundulus
  • Elizabeth M. Yagle


  1. 1.

    A method is described for measuring the rate of water exchange through living membranes.

  2. 2.

    By this method definite rates of water exchange forFundulus eggs of different ages were established in solutions oi NaCl, KCl and CaCl2 of various molar concentrations. The effect of these salts in increasing permeability seems to be due to their cations, the order of effectiveness being Na>K>Ca.

  3. 3.

    Marked physiological differences in the membranes of eggs in various developmental stages are indicated.

  4. 4.

    The effect of the hydrogen-ion concentration of the solution on the rates of water exchange is of little significance.

  5. 5.

    Antagonistic effects of mixtures of salts are not evident in the time interval involved in the experiments.

  6. 6.

    The rÔles of the chorion and the vitelline membrane in the water and salt exchange of the egg ofFundulus are discussed.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Bodine, J. H. 1928. Action of salts onFundulus egg. Biol. Bull.,54, 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gray, J. 1913. Quoted byLillie, R. S.. Am. J. Physiol.,45, 406.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lillie, R. S. 1916. Increase of permeability to water following normal and artificial activation in sea urchin eggs. Am. J. Physiol.,40, 249.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    — 1918. The increase of permeability to water in fertilized sea urchin eggs and the influence of cyanide and anaesthetics upon this change. Am. J. Physiol.,45, 406.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loeb, J. 1900. The poisonous character of a pure NaCl solution. Am. J. Physiol.,3, 327.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    — 1905. Weitere Bemerkungen zur Theorie der antagonistischen Salzwirkungen. Arch. ges. Physiol.,107, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    — 1911. über den Mechanismus der antagonistischen Salzwirkungen. Biochem. Zeitschr.,36, 275.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    — 1912. Antagonistic action of electrolytes and permeability of the cell membrane. Science,36, 637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    — 1915. On the role of electrolytes in the diffusion of acid into the egg ofFundulus. J. Biol. Chem.,23, 139.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    — 1915. The mechanism of antagonistic salt action. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc.,1, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    — 1916. Antagonistic salt action as a diffusion phenomenon. Science,44, 574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    — 1916. The mechanism of diffusion of electrolytes through animal membranes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc.,2, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13(a).
    — 1916. The mechanism of the diffusion of electrolytes through the membranes of living cells. I. The necessity of the general salt effect upon the membrane as a prerequisite for the diffusion. J. Biol. Chem.,27, 339;Google Scholar
  14. 13(b).
    — 1916. The mechanism of the diffusion of electrolytes through the membranes of living cells. II. The diffusion of KCl out of the egg ofFundulus and the relative efficiency of different ions for the salt effect. Ibid., 353;Google Scholar
  15. 13(c).
    — 1916. The mechanism of the diffusion of electrolytes through the membranes of living cells. III. The analogy of the mechanism of the diffusion for acids and potassium salts. Ibid., 363.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    — 1917. V. The additive effect of salt and base and the antagonistic effect of salt and acid. J. Biol. Chem.,32, 147.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    — 1922. Sodium chloride and selective diffusion in living organisms. J. Gen. Physiol.,5, 231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    — 1923. Influence of salts on the rate of diffusion of acid through collodion membranes. J. Gen. Physiol.,5, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    — andMcCattell, McK. 1915. The influence of electrolytes upon the diffusion of potassium out of the cell and into the cell. J. Biol. Chem.,23, 41.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    — andWasteneys, H. 1915. Note on the apparent change of osmotic pressure of cell contents with the osmotic pressure of the surrounding solution. J. Biol. Chem.,23, 157.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Lucke, B. andMcCutcheon, M. 1925. The effect of hydrogen-ion concentration on swelling of cells. J. Gen. Physiol.,9, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    Lyon, E. P. andSchackell, L. F. 1910. Increased permeability of sea urchin eggs following fertilization. Science,32, 249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    McClendon, J. F. 1910. Electrolytic experiments showing increase in permeability of the egg to ions at the beginning of development. Science,32, 122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    — 1913. The relation between abnormal permeability and abnormal development ofFundulus eggs. Science,38, 280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 23.
    — 1914. The preservation of the life of the frog's egg and the initiation of development by increase in permeability. Am. J. Physiol.,35, 163.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    Michaelis, L. andWeech, A. A. 1929. Studies on permeability of membranes. VIII. The behavior of the dried collodion membrane toward bivalent cations. J. Gen. Physiol.,12, 487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 25.
    Nicholas, J. S. 1927. The application of experimental methods to the study of developingFundulus embryos. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc.,13, 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    Northrop, J. H. 1928. The permeability of the dry collodion membranes. J. Gen. Physiol.,11, 233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 27.
    Sumwalt, M. 1929. Potential differences across the chorion of theFundulus egg. Biol. Bull.,56, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 28.
    Svetlov, P. 1929. Entwicklungsphysiologische Beobachtungen an Forelleneiern. Arch. f. Entwicklungsmechanik,114, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 29.
    Thorner, M. H. 1929. Recovery of the heart-beat ofFundulus embryo after stoppage by potassium chloride. Biol. Bull.,56, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger 1930

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth M. Yagle
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoology LaboratoryUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA
  2. 2.Biological LaboratoryCold Spring HarborUSA

Personalised recommendations