Experientia

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 817–823 | Cite as

Sperm predence in a hermaphroditic nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) is due to competitive superiority of male sperm

  • C. W. LaMunyon
  • S. Ward
Research Articles

Abstract

When male and hermaphroditeCaenorhabditis elegans mate, the male's sperm outcompete the hermaphrodite's own sperm and fertilize a majority of the offspring. Here, we investigate the mechanism of male sperm precedence. We rule out the possibility that male sperm are stronger and more competitive because they are activated later than hermaphrodite sperm. We also find that a previously known gender difference in sperm activation does not influence sperm competition. Male sperm, rinsed free of seminal fluid, retained the capacity to take precedence after artificial insemination. Therefore, we conclude that male sperm themselves are competitively superior to hermaphrodite sperm. This trait maximizes outcrossing after mating and may increase both genetic diversity and heterozygosity of offspring whose parents, due to self-fertilization, may be highly homozygous.

Key words

Caenorhabditis elegans mating sperm competition sperm activation sexual dimorphism outcrossing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barker, D. M., Anim. Behav.48 (1994) 147.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Voorhies, W. A., Nature360 (1992) 456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shakes, D. C., and Ward, S., Devl Biol.134 (1989) 189.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ward, S., and Carrel, J. S., Devl Biol.73 (1979) 304.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waller, D. M., in: The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding, p. 97. Ed. N. W. Thornhill. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Honda, H., J. morph. Physiol.40 (1925) 191.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Argon, Y., and Ward, S., Genetics96 (1980) 413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brenner, S., Genetics77 (1974) 71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaMunyon, C. W., and Ward, S., Genetics138 (1994) 689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nelson, G. A., and Ward, S., Cell.19 (1980) 457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klass, M. R., and Hirsh, D., Devl Biol.84 (1981) 299.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silberglied, R. E., Shepherd, J. G., and Dickinson, J. L., Am. Nat.123 (1984) 255.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dickinson, J. L., Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.18 (1986) 331.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simmons, L. W., and Parker, G. A., Evolution46 (1992) 366.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Helverson, D., and von Helverson, O., Behav. ecol. Sociobiol.28 (1991) 391.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waage, J. K., Science203 (1979) 916.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker, W. F., Am. Nat.115 (1980) 780.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    LaMunyon, C. W., and Eisner, T., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA91 (1994) 7081.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    LaMunyon, C. W., and Eisner, T., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA90 (1993) 4689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dewsbury, D. A., in: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, p. 547 Ed. R. L. Smith. Academic, Orlando, Florida (USA) 1984.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O'Brien, S. J., Roelke, M. E., Marker, L., Newman, A., Winkler, C. A., Meltzer, D., Colly, L., Evermann, J. F., Bush, M., and Wildt, D. E., Science227 (1985) 1428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maynard Smith, J., in: Group Selection, p. 163. Ed. G. C. Williams. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, Illinois (USA) 1971.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bernstein, H., Hopf, F. A., and Michod, R. E., in: The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas, p. 139. Eds R. E. Michod and B. R. Levin. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts (USA) 1988.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muller, H. J., Mutat. Res.1 (1964) 2.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Felsenstein, J., Genetics78 (1974) 737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heller, R., and Maynard Smith, J., Genet. Res.34 (1978) 289.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beardmore, J. A., in: Genetics and Conservation, p. 125. Eds. C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde and W. L. Thomas. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California (USA) 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wildt, D. E., Bush, M., Goodrowe, K. L., Packer, C., Pusey, A. E., Brown, J. L., Joslin, P., and O'Brien, S. J., Nature329 (1987) 328.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sulston, J., and Hodgkin, J., in: The NematodeCaenorhabditis elegans, p. 589. Ed. W. B. Wood. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Monograph 17, Cold Spring Harbor, New York (USA) 1988Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wood, W. B., Hecht, R., Carr, S., Vanderslice, R., Wolf, N., and Hirsh, D., Devl Biol.74 (1980) 446.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poinar, G. O., The Natural History of Nematodes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (USA) 1983.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baird, S. E., Sutherlin, M. E., and Emmons, S. W., Evolution46 (1992) 585.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J., Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (USA) 1981.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rice, W. R., Evolution43 (1989) 223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. LaMunyon
    • 1
  • S. Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations