Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 257–264 | Cite as

A randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle exercises to treat postnatal urinary incontinence

  • P. D. Wilson
  • G. P. Herbison
Original Article

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the extent to which a program of reinforced pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) reduces urinary incontinence 1 year after delivery. Two hundred and thirty women who were incontinent 3 months postpartum were randomized to either a control group doing standard postnatal pelvic floor muscle exercises (n=117) or to an intervention group (n=113) who saw a physiotherapist for instruction at approximately 3, 4, 6 and 9 months postpartum. Results collected 12 months after delivery included prevalence and frequency of incontinence and PFME, sexual satisfaction, perineometry measurements and pad tests. Twenty-six (22%) of the control group and 59 (52%) of the intervention group withdrew before the final assessment. The prevalence of incontinence was significantly less in the intervention group than in the control group (50% versus 76%,P=0.0003), and this group also did significantly more PFME. There were no significant differences between the groups as regards sexual satisfaction, perineometry measurements or pad test results.

Keywords

Conservative treatment Pelvic floor muscle exercises Postnatal urinary incontinence Randomized controlled trial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    MacArthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG. Health after childbirth.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:1193–1195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:154–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TU. Prevalence of urinary incontinence.Br Med J 1980;281:1243–1245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holst K, Wilson PD. The prevalence of female urinary incontinence and reasons for not seeking treatment.NZ Med J 1988;101:756–758Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M. Perineal nerve damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence. An electrophysiological study.Br J Urol 1985;57:422–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith AR, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:24–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mandelstam D. Physiotherapy. In: Stanton S, ed. Clinical gynaecological urology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1984;510.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berghmans LCM, Hendriks HJM, Bø K, Hay-Smith EJ, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of randomised clinical trials.Br J Urol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sleep J, Grant A. Pelvic floor exercises in postnatal care.Midwifery 1987;3:158–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM, Setchell M. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation.Br J Surg 1985;72 (Suppl):S15-S17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy: active treatment of sexual dysfunctions. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1974;402–403Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott RS, Hsueh GSC. A clinical study of the effects of galvanic vaginal muscle stimulation in urinary stress incontinence and sexual dysfunction.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:663–665Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kitzinger S. Women's experience of sex. London: Dorling Kindesley, 1983:48Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roughan PA, Kunst L. A pelvic floor exercises really improve orgasmic potential?J Sex Marital Ther 1981;7:223–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plevnik S, New method for testing and strengthening of pelvic floor muscles. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the International Continence Society. London, 1985;267–268Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peattie AB, Plevnik S, Stanton SL. Vaginal cones: a conservative method of treatment genuine stress incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:1049–1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson PD, Borland M. Vaginal cones for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence.Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;30:157–160Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peattie AG, Plevnik S. Cones versus physiotherapy as a conservative method of treating genuine stress incontinence.Neurourol Urodyn 1988;7:265–266Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pieber D, Zivkovic F, Tamussino K. Pelvic floor exercises without or with vaginal cones in premenopausal women with mild to moderate stress incontinence.Gynäkol Geburtshilf Rundsch 1994;34:32–33Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bø K. Vaginal weight cones. Theoretical framework, effect on pelvic floor muscle strength and female stress urinary incontinence.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74:87–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Millard R. Bladder control, a simple self-help guide. Sydney: MacLennan & Petty, 1987:25–32Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gordon H, Logue M. Perineal muscle function after childbirth.Lancet 1985 (July): 123–125Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson PD, Herbison GP, Heer K. Reproducability of perineometer measurements.Neurourol Urodyn 1991;10:399–400Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rust J, Golombok S. The GRISS: a psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.Arch Sexual Behav 1986;15:157–165Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilson PD, Mason MV, Herbison GP, Sutherst JR. An evaluation of the home pad test.Br J Urol 1989;64:161–163Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mørkved S, Bø K. The effect of post-natal exercises to strengthen the pelvic floor muscles.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75:382–385PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Wilson
    • 1
  • G. P. Herbison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations