Foundations of Physics

, Volume 18, Issue 11, pp 1093–1139 | Cite as

A neo-intuitive proposal for Kaluza-Klein unification

  • Steven M. Rosen
Part V. Invited Papers Dedicated To David Bohm
Received:

Abstract

This paper addresses a central question of contemporary theoretical physics: Can a unified account be provided for the known forces of nature? The issue is brought into focus by considering the recently revived Kaluza-Klein approach to unification, a program entailing dimensional transformation through cosmogony. First it is demonstrated that, in a certain sence, revitalized Kaluza-Klein theory appears to undermine the intuitive foundations of mathematical physics, but that this implicit consequence has been repressed at a substantial cost. A fundamental reformulation of the Kaluza-Klein strategy is then undertaken, one that casts it within a new intuitive context. This is followed by a provisional application of the suggested approach to the specific problem of cosmological change. The paper concludes by exploring the far-reaching epistemological implications of the “neo-intuitive” proposal set forth.

Keywords

Mathematical Physic Theoretical Physic Specific Problem Central Question Substantial Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Bohm and B. Hiley,Found. Phys. 15, 95 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Scherk and J. Schwarz,Phys. Lett. 57B, 463 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Cremmer and J. Scherk,Nucl. Phys. B103, 399 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Kaluza,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. K1, 966 (1921).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Klein,Z. Phys. 37, 895 (1926).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Hooker,Man/Environ. Syst. 12, 121 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Fuller and S. McMurrin,A History of Philosophy, 3rd. edn. (Holt, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Weyl,Space-Time-Matter (Dover, New York, 1922).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Witten,Nucl. Phys. B186, 412 (1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Hurewicz and H. Wallman,Dimension Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1941).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Muses,J. Stud. Consciousness 1, 29 (1968).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Cappek,Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Van Nostrand, New York, 1961).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Karush,Crescent Dictionary of Mathematics (Macmillan, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Rosen,Man/Environ. Syst. 12, 9 (1982).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Bohm,Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Stapp,Found. Phys. 9, 1 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Josephson,Phys. Educ. 22, 15 (1987).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Menger,Rice Inst. Pamphlet 27, 1 (1940).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Rosen,Scientia 110, 539 (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Rosen,Main Currents 31, 115 (1975).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Rosen,Spec. Sci. Technol. 6, 413 (1983).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Rosen, inPhysics and the Ultimate Significance of Time, D. Griffin, ed. (SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y., 1986), pp. 219–230.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Muses,Math./Physical Corresp. 11, 17 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Stapp, inPhysics and the Ultimate Significance of Time, D. Griffin, ed. (SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y., 1986), pp. 264–270).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (Harper & Row, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Heidegger,Being and Time (J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, trans.) (Harper & Row, New York, 1962) (Sein und Zeit, 1927).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Muses,Destiny and Control in Human Systems (Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, 1985).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Muses,Impact of Science on Society (UNESCO)27, 67 (1977).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Heidegger, inMartin Heidegger: Basic Writings, D. Krell, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Jahn and B. Dunne,On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness, Appendix B (School of Engineering/Applied Sciences, Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. Graves,The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Mandelbrot,Fractals (Freeman, San Francisco, 1977).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Rucker,The Fourth Dimension (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1984)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Bohm,The Special Theory of Relativity (Benjamin, New York, 1965), Appendix.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Rosen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCollege of Staten Island of the City University of New YorkStaten Island

Personalised recommendations