AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 141–149 | Cite as

The Strategic Computing Program at four years: Implications and intimations

  • Chris Hables Gray

Abstract

Examining the Strategic Computing Program after four years, in the context of the crucial recognition that it is only a small part of the whole range of military artificial intelligence applications, suggests a number of clear implications and intimations about such crucial questions as: 1) the current roles of industry and the universities in developing high technology war; 2) the effects on political and military policy of high-tech weapons systems; and 3) the importance of advanced military computing to subtle philosophical dilemmas including human self-definition and the future of war.

Keywords

artificial intelligence high technology military doctrine Star Wars strategic computing war 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DARPA (1983).Strategic Computing. Department of Defense,Google Scholar
  2. DARPA (1987).Strategic Computing Third Annual Report. Department of Defense,Google Scholar
  3. Deitchman, S. (1985).Weapons, Platforms, and the New Armed Services: Issues in Science and Technology. 83–107.Google Scholar
  4. Donovan, Col. J. UCMC Ret. (1970).Militarism USA.Google Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, H and S.L. Dreyfus, (1986).Mind over Machine, The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, P. (1985). Border Wars: the Science and Politics of Artificial Intelligence,Radical America. 19, 6. 39–50.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, D. (1985).The Button: The Pentagon's Strategic Command and Control System. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1980).Power/Knowledge. Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Gibson, J. (1986).The Perfect War: Technowar in Vietnam. Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, C. (1987a).Artificial Intelligence and Real War. 1987 Conference of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, November, Worcester, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, C. (1987b).The Rhetoric of Military Artificial Intelligence. 5th Annual Student Pugwash Conference, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  12. Guralnik, David (ed.) (1970).Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language. World Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for Cyborgs,Socialist Review. 80. 65–107.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, J. and J. Blair (eds)Leadership on the Future Battlefield. University of Texas.Google Scholar
  15. Janowitz, M. (1960).The Professional Soldier. The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Klare, M. (1972).War Without End: American Planning of the Next Vietnams. Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. Lifton, R. (1970).Boundaries: Psychological Man in Revolution. Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Marshal, S. (1947).Men Against Fire. William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  19. Melman, S. (1974).The Permanent War Economy.Google Scholar
  20. Ornstein, S. et al. (1984).Strategic Computing, Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists. December.Google Scholar
  21. Parnas, D. (1985). Software Aspects of Strategic Defense Systems.American Scientist. Sept–Oct.Google Scholar
  22. Possony, S. and E. Pournelle (1970).The Strategy of Technology.Google Scholar
  23. Pringle, P. & W. Arkin (1983).SIOP: Nuclear War From the Inside. Sphere Books Ltd. London.Google Scholar
  24. Pullum, G. (1987). Natural Language Interfaces and Strategic Computing,AI & Society. 1,1. 47–58.Google Scholar
  25. Sofia, Z. (1984). Exterminating Fetuses,Diacritics. 14,2. 57–59.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, B. (1985).Limits of Correctness in Computers. Report No CSLI-85-36, Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, E. (1980). Notes on Exterminism: The Last Stage of Civilization,New Left Review. 20, May–June.Google Scholar
  28. Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. Virilio, P. & S. Lotringer (1983).Pure War. Semiotext.Google Scholar
  30. Weick, K. (1985). A Stress Analysis of Future Battlefields, in Hunt and BlairLeadership on the Future Battlefield. University of Texas.Google Scholar
  31. Winograd, T. (1987).Strategic Computing Research and the Universities. Stanford University Department of Computer Science, Report No STAN-CS-87-1160.Google Scholar
  32. Winograd, T. (1988). Computers and Rationality: The Myths and Realities, in Gordon (ed.)Microelectronics In Transition. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Hables Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.History of Consciousness Board of Studies, Kresge CollegeUniversity of California at Santa CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations