Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 1357–1368 | Cite as

Sir Karl Popper and his philosophy of physics

  • Max Jammer
Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To Sir Karl Popper
Received:

Abstract

The eminent mathematical physicist Sir Hermann Bondi once said: “There is no more to science than its method, and there is no more to its method than Popper has said.” Indeed, many regard Sir Karl Raimund Popper the greatest philosopher of science in our generation. Much of what Popper “has said” refers to physics, but physicists, generally speaking, have little knowledge of what he has said. True, Popper's philosophy of science and, in particular, his realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics deviates considerably from the generally accepted doctrine. But as Popper, rightly I think, points out, it is precisely the proliferation of divergent theories which promotes the growth of scientific knowledge; it would be a danger for physics if physicists were dogmatically tied to a single theory or would not test their theory against alternatives. It is for this purpose that, on the occasion of the nonagenarian celebration of Popper's birthday, the present essay has been written.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Magee,Karl Popper (Viking Press, New York, 1973), p. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Popper, Autobiography, inThe Philosophy of Karl Popper, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1974), p. 23.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 57.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Popper,Logik der Forschung (Springer, Vienna, 1934);The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, London; Basic Books, New York, 1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ref. 3, p. 176.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Popper,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 1, 117 (1950).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Popper,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 10, 28 (1959).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Popper, “The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probability, and the quantum theory,” inObservation and Interpretation, S. Körner, ed. (Butterworths, London, 1957), p. 65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Popper, “Quantum mechanics without ‘The Observer,’” inQuantum Theory and Reality, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1967), p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Popper,Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery—Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, W. W. Bartley, III, ed. (Hutchinson, London, 1982).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Feynman,Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1965), Vol. 3, p. 1–1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ref. 10, p. 149.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ref. 12, p. 19.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ref. 12, p. 142.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ref. 12, p. 27. Quotation in K. Popper, “Proposal for a simplified new variant of the experiment of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen,”V. Weizsäcker Festschrift (Hanser Verlag, Munich, 1982), p. 313.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ref. 12, p. 20.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Popper,Nature (London) 177, 538 (1956);178, 382 (1956);179, 1297 (1957);181, 402 (1958);207, 233 (1965);213, 320 (1967);214, 322 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Popper,Philosophy and Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ref. 12, p. 36.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ref. 2, p. 124.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. E. Kyberg,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 25, 358 (1974).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Krips,Philos. Q. 39, 308 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ref. 2, p. 760.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ref. 2, p. 1132.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Keuth,J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 7, 99 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Popper,Nature (London) 219, 682 (1968).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    E. Scheibe,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 25, 319 (1974).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. W. Bartley, III,Philosophia 7, 686 (1977).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ref. 3, p. 450.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ref. 10, p. 155.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    N. D. Mermin,Boojums All the Way Through (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990), p. 192.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Stöckler, “Abschied von Kopenhagen?” inVersuche und Widerlegungen—Offene Probleme im Werk Karl Poppers, K. Müller, F. Stadler, and F. Wallner, eds. (Geyer-Edition, Vienna, 1986), p. 353.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Sudbery,Philos. Sci. 52, 470 (1985).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Open Questions in Quantum Physics, G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985), p. 26.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    F. Selleri,Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990), p. 351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Jammer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations