Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 1205–1220 | Cite as

Schrödinger and the interpretation of quantum mechanics

  • Fritz Rohrlich
Part II. Invited Papers Commemorating The Centenary Of The Birth Of Erwin Schrödinger

Abstract

On the occasion of the centennial of his birth, Schrödinger's life and views are sketched and his critique of the interpretation of quantum mechanics accepted at his time is examined. His own interpretation, which he had to abandon after a short time, provides a prime example of the way in which the tentative meaning of central theoretical terms in a new and revolutionary theory often fails. Schrödinger's strong philosophical convictions have played a key role in his refusal to break with many of the notions of classical physics. At the same time, they made him into a keen and incisive critic of the Copenhagen interpretation. His criticism is compared with present views on quantum mechanics.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Incisive Critic Classical Physic Theoretical Term Present View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Schrödinger,Nature and the Greeks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1954).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    From Schrödinger's speech at the occasion of his inauguration to membership in the Prussian Academy of Science, 1929, as quoted by M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), p. 255.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Schrödinger,Nuovo Cimento 9, 162–170 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Schrödinger,My View of the World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Boltzmann,Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974), pp. 33 and 65.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Bertotti, “The later work of E. Schrödinger,”Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 16, 83–100 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. A. Wessels,Schrödinger's Interpretation of Wave Mechanics, Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Schrödinger,Naturwissenschaften 17, 486–489 (1929).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Schrödinger, “Are there quantum jumps?”Br. J. Philos. Sci. 3, Part I: 109–123, Part II: 233–242 (1952).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Schrödinger, “Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik,”Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 83, 956–968 (1927).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Schrödinger,Was ist ein Naturgesetz? (R. Oldenburg, Muenchen, 1962), p. 102 (my translation).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Przibram,Briefe zur Wellenmechanik (Springer-Verlag, Wien, 1963).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. V. Raman and P. Forman, “Why was it Schrödinger who developed de Broglie's ideas?”,Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 1, 291–314 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Wessels, “Schrödinger's route to wave mechanics,”Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 10, 311–340 (1979).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Schrödinger,Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics (Chelsea, New York, 1982); contains a translation of his four original papers as well as later papers and four lectures.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgaenge,”Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926). It is to be noted that this first of several publications about the probabilistic interpretation by Born contains the crucial point (that ψψ* rather than |ψ| is to be interpreted as a probability) only as a footnote.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Heisenberg, “Ueber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,”Z. Phys. 43, 172–198 (1927).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Schrödinger, “Neue Wege in der Physik,”Elektrotech. Z. 50, 15–16 (1929).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Schrödinger, “Ueber das Verhaeltnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinen,”Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 79, 734–756 (1926).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quoted by A. Pais,Inward Bound (Clarendeon Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 255.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,”Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Schrödinger, “Probability relations between separated systems,”Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32, 446–452 (1936).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwaertige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,”Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812, 823–828, 844–849 (1935). A translation can be found in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek,Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982); A. Aspect, J. Delibart, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Rohrlich, “Schrödinger's criticism of quantum mechanics—fifty years later,” pp. 555–572, in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Fifty Years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. D. Mermin, “The EPR experiment—thoughts about the loophole,” pp. 422–427, in D. M. Greenberger,New Techniques and Ideas in the Quantum Measurement Theory (New York Academy of Science, New York, 1987);Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 422–427 (1986).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Shimony, “Metaphysical Problems in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,”Int. Philos. Quarterly 18, 2–17 (1978).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Shimony, “Reflections on the Philosophy of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger,” pp. 305–317, in R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky,A Portrait of Twenty Five Years, Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1960–1985 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Rohrlich, “Reality and Quantum Mechanics,” pp. 373–381 in Ref. 28. inGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    W. Heisenberg,Philosophy and Physics (Harper, New York, 1958), especially p. 185.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. L. G. Redhead, “Relativity and quantum mechanics—conflict or peaceful coexistence?” pp. 14–20 in Ref. 28. inGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Schrödinger,Statistical Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1948).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. Schrödinger,Space-time Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Schrödinger,What is Life? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritz Rohrlich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations