Gastrointestinal Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 259–263 | Cite as

Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma

  • Sven Goldman
  • Håkan Arvidsson
  • Ulf Norming
  • Ulla Lagerstedt
  • Inger Magnusson
  • Jan Frisell


A comparison of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and computed tomography (CT) for staging of rectal carcinoma was performed. Thirty-two patients were examined by TRUS and 30 by CT. The results of these preoperative examinations were compared with postoperative histopathological findings. TRUS had an accuracy of 81% and it predicted perirectal tumor growth with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 67%, whereas the corresponding figures for CT were 52%, 67%, and 27%. These findings indicate that TRUS is more efficient than CT in staging local tumor growth in rectal cancer. Neither technique, however, can reliably identify lymph node metastases, since no correlation was found between lymph node size as observed on CT and TRUS and tumor involvement as evaluated histopathologically.

Key words

Adenocarcinoma, lower rectal Staging, US, CT Lymph nodes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    National Board of Health and Welfare of Sweden. The Cancer Registry. Cancer Incidence in Sweden, 1984Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Påhlman L, Glimelius B. Local recurrences after surgical treatment for rectal carcinoma.Acta Chir Scand 1984; 150:331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC).TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4 ed. Geneva; Switzerland, 1982Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamlin DJ, Burgener FA, Sischy B. New technique to stage early rectal carcinoma by computed tomography.Radiology 1981; 141:539–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hildebrandt U, Feifel G. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound.Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28:42–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, Suzuki M, Arai T, Nunomura M. Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination.Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29:234–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theoni RF, Moss AA, Schnyder P, Margulis AR. Detection and staging of primary rectal cancer by computed tomography.Radiology 1981; 141:135–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zaunbauer W, Haertel M, Fuchs WA. Computed tomography in carcinoma of the rectum.Gastrointest Radiol 1981; 6:79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dukes CE. The surgical pathology of rectal cancer.J Clin Pathol 1949; 2:95–98Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicholls RJ, York Mason A, Morson BC, Dixon AK, Kelsey, Fry J. The clinical staging of rectal cancer.Br J Surg 1982; 69:404–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Påhlman L, Adalsteinsson B, Glimelius B, Lindgren PG, Scheibenpflug L. Ultrasound in preoperative staging of rectal tumours.Acta Radiol Diagn 1984; 25:489–494Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romano G, deRosa P, Vallone G, Rotondo A, Grassi R, Santangelo ML. Intrarectal ultrasound and computed to-mography in the pre- and postoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer.Br J Surg 1985; 72:117–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams NS, Durdey P, Quirke P, et al. Pre-operative staging of rectal neoplasm and its impact on clinical management.Br J Surg 1985; 72:868–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adalsteinsson B, Glimelius B, Graffman S, Hemmingsson A, Påhlman L. Computed tomography in staging of rectal carcinoma.Acta Radiol Diagn 1985; 26:45–55Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DMA, Channer JL, Virjee J, Goddard P. Pre-operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography?Br J Surg 1986; 73:1015–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dixon AK, Fry JK, Morson BC, Nicholls RJ, York Mason A. Pre-operative computed tomography of carcinoma of the rectum.Br J Radiol 1981; 54:655–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waizer A, Zitron S, Ben-Baruch D, Baniel J, Wolloch Y, Dintsman M. Comparative study for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rifkin MD, Wechsler RJ. A comparison of computed to-mography and endorectal ultrasound in staging rectal cancer.Int J Colorect Dis 1986; 1:219–223Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Am J Clin Oncol 1987; 10:369–375Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morgan CL, Throught WS, Oddson TA, Clark WH, Rice KP. Ultrasound patterns of disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract.Radiology 1980; 135:129–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Chalmers AC, Chennels B, Dixon HF, Finan P, Primrose J. Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer.Br J Surg 1988; 75:1019–1022PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Goldman
    • 1
  • Håkan Arvidsson
    • 2
  • Ulf Norming
    • 3
  • Ulla Lagerstedt
    • 4
  • Inger Magnusson
    • 1
  • Jan Frisell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of UrologyStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Department of PathologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations