Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 201–210 | Cite as

The quality of tomato for canning as affected by combined chloride, nitrate and osmotic potential of the nutrient solution

  • A. Albu-Yaron
  • A. Feigin
  • I. Rylski
Article

Abstract

The quality of tomato fruit and juice (Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. VF M82-1-8) grown in an aerohydroponic system in a greenhouse was affected by the level of Cl and NO 3 , and by the osrnotic potential (OP) of the nutrient solutions. The total suspended solids (degrees Brix) in the fresh juice increased from approximately 4.0 in the nonsaline solutions (OP ∼ −0.05 MPa) to approximately 5.6–5.8 in the saline solutions (OP ∼ −0.45 MPa). Juice acidity was similarly affected by the Cl, NO 3 and OP levels in the nutrient solutions. Less affected, the ascorbic acid content of juice, was lowest (∼ 8–9 mg/100 cc) in the high-NO 3 -nonsaline solution treatments, and was between 10 and 12 mg/100 cc at OP levels greater than ∼ −0.2 MPa. NO 3 in the juice was high (∼ 60 mg/L) under low OP conditions (∼ −0.05 to −0.1 MPa), especially when combined with high NO 3 levels, and lower (between 8 and 30 mg/L) in plants exposed to saline conditions (low OP). Fruit puffiness (boxiness) was reduced markedly by salinity and was not considerably affected by the NO 3 /Cl ratio, while fruit firmness was influenced by both factors.

Key words

Tomatoes (lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. VF M82-1-8) nitrate chloride osmotic potential juice quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albu-Yaron A, Semel A (1976) Nitrate-induced corrosion of tinplate as affected by organic acid foods componements. J Agric Food Chem 24: 344–348Google Scholar
  2. AOAC (1980) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 13th ed. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Feigin A (1985) Fertilization management of crops irrigated with saline water. Plant Soil 82: 285–299Google Scholar
  4. Feigin A, Rylski I, Meiri A, Shalhevet J (1987) Response of melon and tomato plants to chloride-nitrate ratio in saline nutrient solutions. J Plant Nutr 10: 1787–1794Google Scholar
  5. Feigin A, Zamir N, Arbel A, Keinan M (1984) A closed hydroponic system for experiments with plants growing in circulating nutrient solutions. Proc 9th Int Congr Soilless Culture (Lunteren, The Netherlands) p. 215Google Scholar
  6. Fudge R, Truman RW (1973) The nitrate and nitrite contents of meat products — a survey by public analysts' laboratories in South Wales and the South West of England. J Assoc Publ Anal 11: 19–27Google Scholar
  7. Gould WA (1974) Tomato Production Processing and Quality Evaluation. Connecticut, The Avi Publ Co, IncGoogle Scholar
  8. Henriksen A, Selmer-Olsen AR (1970) Automatic methods for determining nitrate and nitrite in water and soil extracts. Analyst 95: 514–518Google Scholar
  9. Kramer M, Sheehy RE, Hiatt WR (1989) Progress towards the genetic engineering of tomato fruit softening. Trends Biotechnol 7: 191–194Google Scholar
  10. Mizrakhi Y (1982) Effect of salinity on tomato fruit ripening. Plant Physiol 69: 966–970Google Scholar
  11. Rylski I (1979a) Effect of temperatures and growth regulators on fruit malformation in tomato. Sci Hortic 10: 27–35Google Scholar
  12. Rylski I (1979b) Fruit set and development of seeded and seedless tomato fruits under diverse regimes of temperature and pollination. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104: 835–838Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Albu-Yaron
    • 1
  • A. Feigin
    • 1
  • I. Rylski
    • 1
  1. 1.ARO, The Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael

Personalised recommendations