Advertisement

Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 381–401 | Cite as

Bhart\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{R} \)hari's solution to the liar and some other paradoxeshari's solution to the liar and some other paradoxes

  • Jan E. M. Houben
Article
  • 101 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Barwise, Jon and John Etchemendy (1987).The Lair. An Essay on Truth and Circularity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bairdeau, M. (1964).Théorie de la Connaissance et Philosophie de la Parole dans le brahmanisme classique. Paris-La Haye: Mouton & Co. (école Pratique des Hautes études — Sorbonne. Sixième Section: Sciences économiques et Sociales. Le Monde d'Outre-Mer, Passé et Présent. Première Série: études XXIII.)Google Scholar
  3. Cardona, G. (1976). \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) ini. A survey of research. The Hague, Mouton & Co. (Indian reprint: Delhi, 1980.)Google Scholar
  4. Davis, Lawrence Ward (1979a).Studies in Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari's VākyapadĪya. Dissertation University of Massachusetts, 1978. Ann Arbor: UMI 7901990.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, Lawrence Ward (1979b). “An alternate formulation of Kripke's Theory of Truth,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 289–296.Google Scholar
  6. Ganguli, Hemanta Kumar (1963).The Philosophy of logical construction; an examination of logical atomism and logical positivism in the light of the philosophies of Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari, DharmakĪrti and Prajñākaragupta. Calcutta.Google Scholar
  7. Herzberger, Hans and Radhika Herzberger (1981). “Bhart\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \)hari's Paradox” JIPh 9: 1–17 (slightly revised version of “Bhart\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \)hari's Paradox” inStudies in Indian Philosophy. A memorial volume in honour of pandit Sukhlalji Sanghvi. (L.D. Series 84.) Gen. ed. Dalsukh Malvania et al. Amedabad, 1981).Google Scholar
  8. Houben, Jan E. M. (1992).The Sa \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) banda-samuddeŚa (Chapter on Relation) and Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari's philosophy of language; A study of Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari Sa \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) bandhasamuddeŚa in the context of the VākyapadĪya with a translation of Helārāja's Commentary PrakĪr \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) a-PrakāŚa. Thesis Utrecht University. (Edition by Egbert Forsten Publishing, Groningen, Netherlands, is forthcoming.)Google Scholar
  9. Houben, Jan E. M. (1993). “Who are Bhart\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \)hari's padadarŚins?” inétudes Asiatiques / Asiatische Studien (Proceedings of World Conference on Bhart\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \)hari, Pune, 1992) 47.1: 155–169.Google Scholar
  10. Iyer, K. A. S. (ed.) (1963).VākyapadĪya of Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari with the commentary of Helārāja, Kā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \) \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \)a III, Part 1. Deccan College Monograph Series 21. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Kripke, Saul (1975). “Outline of a Theory of Truth,”Journal of Philosophy, Nov. 6, 1975: 690–716.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, Robert L. (ed.) (1970).The Paradox of the Liar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Matilal, B. K. (1990).The Word and the World. India's contribution to the study of language. Delhi, etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Potter, Karl H. (1977).Encyclopedia, of Indian Philosophies, vol. II.The tradition of Nyāya-VaiŚe \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) ika up to GangeŚa. Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass.Google Scholar
  15. Quine, W. V. (1966). “The Ways of Paradox” inThe Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Rau, Wilhelm (ed.) (1977).Bhart \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \) hari's VākyapadĪya. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, Band XLII, 4. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  17. Russell, Bertrand (1950).An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. (First published by George Allen & Unwin, 1950.) Reprint: London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Sainsbury, R. M. (1988).Paradoxes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tarski, Alfred (1956). “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.”Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956: 152–277. This article is a translation of “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen.”Studia Philosophica 1 (1935): 261–405. This in turn is a translation of the Polish original Pojecię prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych. Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydział III matematycznofizyczny, No. 34, Warsaw 1933.Google Scholar
  20. Tarski, Alfred (1969). “Truth and Proof.”Scientific American 194: 63–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan E. M. Houben
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute for Asian StudiesLeiden UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations