European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 102, Issue 4, pp 325–337 | Cite as

Comparative study of morphological, cultural and molecular markers for the characterization ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides isolates

  • M. L. Gac
  • F. Montfort
  • N. Cavelier
  • A. Sailland
Research Articles

Abstract

Nirenberg's classification system and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combined with restriction enzyme digestion of an amplified ribosomal DNA fragment, were compared for the characterization of sixty isolates ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, from various geographical areas and with differing fungicide sensitivity. With Nirenberg's system, it was possible to identify most isolates asP. herpotrichoides var.herpotrichoides orP. herpotrichoides var.acuformis. However, identification was slow and sometimes inconclusive as overlap occurred between the two varieties for all criteria examined. Molecular markers identified two distinct types among the isolates tested and generally good correlation was found between the PCR-based assay and Nirenberg's system, but the molecular assay was more accurate and faster.

Key words

eyespot internal transcribed spacer polymerase chain reaction restriction analysis ribosomal RNA genes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belkhiri A and Dick MW (1988) Comparative studies on the DNA ofPythium species and some possibly related taxa. J. gen. Microbiol. 134: 2673–2683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavelier N and Le Page D (1985) Caractéristiques des souches dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron) Deighton (agent du piétin-verse des céréales) résistantes aux fongicides benzimidazoles et thiophanates: pouvoir pathogène, capacité de développement. Premières Journées d'Etudes sur les Maladies des Plantes, Versailles, Annales ANPP 1: 49–56Google Scholar
  3. Cavelier N, Rousseau M and Le Page D (1987) Variabilité dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, agent du piétin-verse des céréales: comportementin vivo de deux types d'isolats et d'une population en mélange. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 94(6): 590–599Google Scholar
  4. Chen W, Hoy JW and Schneider RW (1992) Species-specific polymorphisms in transcribed ribosomal DNA of fivePythium species. Experiment. Mycol. 16: 22–34Google Scholar
  5. Creighton NF (1989) Identification of W-type and R-type isolates ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Plant Pathol. 38: 484–493Google Scholar
  6. Creighton NF, Cavelier N and Fitt BDL (1989) Pathogenicity to wheat and rye ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides isolates from France and the U.K. Mycol. Res. 92(1): 13–17Google Scholar
  7. Cubeta MA, Echandi E, Abernethy T and Vilgalys R (1991) Characterization of anastomosis groups of binucleateRhizoctonia species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene. Phytopathology 81(11): 1395–1400Google Scholar
  8. Frei U and Wenzel G (1993) Differentiation and diagnosis ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron) Deighton with genomic DNA probes. J. Phytopathol. 139: 229–237Google Scholar
  9. Gac ML (1991) Etude de la variabilité dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron) Deighton, agent du piétin-verse des céréales par la technique PCR. D.E.A., Université de Nantes, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Gallimore K, Knights IK and Barnes G (1987) Sensitivity ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides to the fungicide prochloraz. Plant Pathol. 36: 290–296Google Scholar
  11. Goulds A and Fitt BDL (1988) The comparative epidemiology of eyespot (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides) types in winter cereal crops. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Pests and Diseases 8C-29: 1035–1040Google Scholar
  12. Henson JM, Goins T, Grey W, Mathre DE and Elliott ML (1993) Use of polymerase chain reaction to detectGaeumannomyces graminis DNA in plants grown in artificially and naturally infested soil. Phytopathology 83(3): 283–287Google Scholar
  13. Hollins TW, Scott PR and Paine JR (1985) Morphology, benomyl resistance and pathogenicity to wheat and rye of isolates ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Plant Pathol. 34: 369–379Google Scholar
  14. Johanson A and Jeger MJ (1993) Use of PCR for detection ofMycosphaerella fijiensis andM. musicola, the causal agents of Sigatoka leaf spots in banana and plantain. Mycol. Res. 97(6): 670–674Google Scholar
  15. Julian AM and Lucas JA (1990) Isozyme polymorphism in patho-types ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides and related species from cereals. Plant Pathol. 39: 178–190Google Scholar
  16. King JE and Griffin MJ (1985) Survey of benomyl resistance inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides on winter wheat and barley in England and Wales in 1983. Plant Pathol. 34: 272–283Google Scholar
  17. Lange-de la Camp M (1966a) Die Wirkungsweise vonCercosporella herpotrichoides Fron, dem Erreger der Halmbruchkrankheit des Getreides. I. Feststellung der Krankheit. Beschaffenheit und Infektionsweise ihres Erregers. Phytopathol. Z. 55: 34–66Google Scholar
  18. Lange-de la Camp M (1966b) Die Wirkungsweise vonCercosporella herpotrichoides Fron, dem Erreger der Halmbruchkrankheit des Getreides. II. AggressivitÄt des Erregers. Phytopathol. Z. 56: 155–190Google Scholar
  19. Lee SB, Milgroom MG and Taylor JW (1988) A rapid, high yield mini-prep method for isolation of total genomic DNA from fungi. Fungal Gen. Newsl. 35: 23–24Google Scholar
  20. Leroux P and Gredt M (1985) Caractéristiques des souches dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, agent du piétin-verse des céréales, résistantes à des inhibiteurs de la biosynthèse des stérols. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris sér. III, 301(17): 785–788Google Scholar
  21. Leroux P and Gredt M (1988) Caractérisation des souches dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, agent du piétin-verse des céréales résistantes à des substances antimitotiques et à des inhibiteurs de la biosynthèse des stérols. Agronomie 8(8): 719–729Google Scholar
  22. Leroux P and Marchegay P (1991) Caractérisation des souches dePseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, agent du piétin-verse des céréales, résistantes au prochloraze, isolées en France sur blé tendre d'hiver. Agronomie 11(9): 767–776Google Scholar
  23. Maraite H, Delforge C, Meunier S and Tetelain A (1985) Distribution of MBC-resistance inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides on winter wheat in Belgium. Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. Rijksuniv. Gent 50(3b): 1173–1180Google Scholar
  24. Mauler A and Fehrmann H (1987) Erfassung der AnfÄlligkeit von Weizen gegenüberPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. I. Untersuchungen zur PathogenitÄt verschiedener Formen des Erregers. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 94(6): 630–636Google Scholar
  25. Nazar RN, Hu X, Schmidt J, Culham D and Robb J (1991) Potential use of PCR-amplified ribosomal intergenic sequences in the detection and differentiation of verticillium wilt pathogens. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 39: 1–11Google Scholar
  26. Nicholson P, Hollins TW, Rezanoor HN and Anamthawat-Jonsson K (1991) A comparison of cultural, morphological and DNA markers for the classification ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Plant Pathol. 40: 584–594Google Scholar
  27. Nicholson P and Rezanoor HN (1994) The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA to identify pathotype and detect variation inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Mycol. Res. 98(1): 13–21Google Scholar
  28. Nicholson P, Rezanoor HN and Hollins TW (1993) Classification of a world-wide collection of isolates ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides by RFLP analysis of mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA and host range. Plant Pathol. 42: 58–66Google Scholar
  29. Nirenberg HI (1981) Differenzierung der Erreger der Halmbruchkrankheit. I. Morphologie. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 88(5): 241–248Google Scholar
  30. Nirenberg HI (1984) Differenzierung der Erreger der Halmbruchkrankheit. II. Physiologische Reaktionen in Kultur. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 91(3): 225–235Google Scholar
  31. Poupard P, Simonet P, Cavelier N and Bardin R (1993) Molecular characterization ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides isolates by amplification of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers. Plant Pathol. 42: 873–881Google Scholar
  32. Priestley RA, Dewey FM, Nicholson P and Rezanoor HN (1992) Comparison of isoenzyme and DNA markers for differentiating W-, R- and C-pathotypes ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Plant Pathol. 41: 591–599Google Scholar
  33. Sanders PL, De Waard MA and Loerakker WM (1986) Resistance to carbendazim inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides from Dutch wheat fields. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 92: 15–20Google Scholar
  34. Schesser K, Luder A and Henson JM (1991) Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect the take-all fungus,Gaeumannomyces graminis, in infected wheat plants. Appl. environ. Microbiol. 57(2): 553–556Google Scholar
  35. Scott PR and Hollins TW (1980) Pathogenic variation inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. Ann. appl. Biol. 94: 297–300Google Scholar
  36. Scott PR, Hollins TW and Muir P (1975) Pathogenicity ofCercosporella herpotrichoides to wheat, barley, oats and rye. Trans. br. mycol. Soc. 65(3): 529–538Google Scholar
  37. Stammler G and Seemüller E (1993) Specific and sensitive detection ofPhytophthora fragariae var.rubi in raspberry roots by PCR amplification. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 100(4): 394–400Google Scholar
  38. Takeuchi T and Kuninaga S (1994) Genetic relationships inPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides determined from DNA relatedness. Mycol. Res. 98(9): 1059–1064Google Scholar
  39. Thomas D, Maraite H and Boutry M (1992) Identification of rye- and wheat-types ofPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides with DNA probes. J. gen. Microbiol. 138: 2305–2309Google Scholar
  40. Ward E and Akrofi AY (1994) Identification of fungi in theGaeumannomyces-Phialophora complex by RFLPs of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNAs. Mycol. Res. 98(2): 219–224Google Scholar
  41. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S and Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ and White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (pp. 315–322). Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  42. Xue B, Goodwin PH and Annis SL (1992) Pathotype identification ofLeptosphaeria maculans with PCR and oligonucleotide primers from ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 41: 179–188Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Gac
    • 1
  • F. Montfort
    • 1
  • N. Cavelier
    • 1
  • A. Sailland
    • 2
  1. 1.Unité de recherches intégrées en grandes culturesINRALe RheuFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de BiotechnologiesRhÔne-Poulenc AgroLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations