Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 350–355 | Cite as

Refractive index matching methods for liquid flow investigations

  • R. Budwig


A difficulty common to most optical diagnostic techniques that are applied to fluid dynamics studies is the refraction of light passing through model and/or test section walls. The method of choice to eliminate refraction problems in liquid flows is to match refractive index. This paper presents techniques for refractive index matching including, (i) arrangement of test section and model, (ii) choice of solid and liquid materials, and (iii) methods for tuning the match. In addition, a new application of refractive index matching to liquid-liquid droplet studies is presented.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bicen AF (1982) Refraction correction for LDA measurements in flows with curved optical boundaries. TSI Quarterly 8: 10–12Google Scholar
  2. Boadway JD; Karahan E (1981) Correction of laser Doppler anemometer reading for refraction of cylindrical interfaces. DISA Information 26: 4–6Google Scholar
  3. Bovendeered PHM; Van Steenhoven AA; Van de Vosse FN; Vossers G (1987) Steady entry flow in a curved pipe. J Fluid Mech 177: 233–246Google Scholar
  4. Budwig R; Elger D; Hooper H; Slippy J (1993) Steady flow in abdominal aneurysm models. ASME J Biomech Eng 115Google Scholar
  5. Budwig R; Martinez J; Carleson T (1993) Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of acoustically levitated and oscillated droplets. (abstract) Bull Amer Phys Soc 33: 2226.Google Scholar
  6. Chen RC; Fan LS (1992) Particle image velocimetry for characterizing the flow structure in three-dimensional gas-liquid-solid fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 47: 3615–3622Google Scholar
  7. Donnelly RJ (1981) Fluid dynamics. In: AIP 50th Anniversary Physics Vade Mecum, editor HL Anderson, pp 182–1954, American Institute of Physics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan DD; Bargeron CB; Borchardt SE; Deters OJ; Gearhart SA; Mark FF (1990) The effect of compliance on wall shear in casts of a human aortic bifurcation. ASME J Biomech Eng 112: 183–188Google Scholar
  9. Durrani TS; Greated CA (1977) Laser Systems in Flow Measurement. pp 97–98. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Durret RP; Gould WH; Stevenson WH; Thompson HD (1985) A correction lens for laser Doppler velocimeter measurements in a cylindrical tube. AIAA 23: 1387–1391Google Scholar
  11. Durst F; Muller R; Jovanovic J (1988) Determination of the measuring position in laser-Doppler anemometry. Exp Fluids 6: 105–110Google Scholar
  12. Edwards RV; Dybbs A (1984) Refractive index matching for velocity measurements in complex geometries. TSI Quarterly 10: 3–11Google Scholar
  13. Hendricks F; Avram A (1981) Use of zinc iodide in flow research. Rev Sci Instrum 53: 75–78Google Scholar
  14. Hooper H (1992) Experimental studies of the hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms. M.S. thesis, University of IdahoGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurlburt CS (1984) The jewler's refractometer as a mineralogical tool. American Mineralogist 69: 391–398Google Scholar
  16. Jan DL; Shapiro AH; Kamm RD (1989) Some features of oscillatory flow in a model bifurcation. J Appl Physiol 67: 147–159Google Scholar
  17. Kirk RE; Othmofer DF (eds) (1984) Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Third edition. Vol 11, pp 807–880. New York: John Wiley and Sons IncGoogle Scholar
  18. Little Giant Pump Company (1993) Chemical resistance chart, form #995516-1193. Little Giant Pump Co., Oklahoma City, OklahomaGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu CH; Vafidis C; Whitelaw JH (1990) Flow in the coolant passages of an internal combustion engine cylinder head. Exp Fluids 10: 50–54Google Scholar
  20. Lowe ML; Kutt PH (1992) Refraction through cylindrical tubes. Exp Fluids 13: 315–320Google Scholar
  21. Marston PL; Goosby SG (1985) Ultrasonically stimulated low-frequency oscillation and breakup of immiscible liquid drops: Photographs Phys Fluids 28: 1233–1242Google Scholar
  22. McDougall TJ (1979) On the elimination of refractive-index variations in turbulent density stratified flows. J Fluid Mech 93: 83–96Google Scholar
  23. Parry AJ; Lalor MJ; Tridimas YD; Woolley NH (1990) Refraction corrections for laser-Doppler anemometry in a pipe bend. Dantec Information 9: 4–6Google Scholar
  24. Perry RH; Green DW (eds) (1984) Perry's chemical engineering handbook. 6th edition, New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidt FW; Kulakowski B; Wang DF (1984) Evaluation of the effect of variable refraction index on the path of a laser beam. Exp Fluids 2: 153–158Google Scholar
  26. Shannon RR; Wyant JC (eds) (1979) Applied optics and optical engineering. p. 81. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Sinkankas J (1966) Mineralogy. Pp 226–233 Princeton: D Van Nostrand CompanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Strong J (1958) Concepts of classical optics. PP 50–52. San Francisco: WH Freeman and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Weast RC (ed) (1988) Handbook of chemistry and physics. 69th edition, Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Budwig
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations