Agricultural water pollution control: An interdisciplinary approach
- 153 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Regulation and control of agricultural water pollution is unique and difficult to accomplish. Water quality standards are often proposed without adequate consideration of the overall economic impact on agricultural production. This article illustrates how economists and physical scientists can cooperate to develop appropriate control strategies for agricultural water pollution. Data provided by physical scientists and economists are used in a linear programming model to describe salt discharge as a function of water management, production levels, and an associated effluent charge. Four water management activities were chosen on the basis of different costs of production (including a parametrically varied effluent charge), water requirements, alfalfa yields, and levels of salt discharge. Results indicate that when the effluent charge is low (<$0.20/metric ton salt discharged), maximum production with maximum salt discharge is most profitable. As the effluent charge is increased ($0.20–$0.40/metric ton salt discharged), it becomes progressively less profitable to produce alfalfa at maximum levels of pollutant discharge. When the effluent charge is >$0.40/metric ton salt discharged, alfalfa production is no longer economically feasible. An important aspect of this approach is that it permits policy makers to identify explicitly the relationship between the environmental standard and the effect on agricultural production.
Key words
Water quality Agricultural discharge Costs of pollution controlPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- Aleti, A., S. Y. Chin, and A. D. McElroy. 1974. Non-point agricultural pollution: status of assessment methodology. Proceedings annual meeting of American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
- Ayers, R. S., and D. W. Westcot. 1976. Irrigation and drainage paper: water quality for agriculture. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p. 30.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates. 1971. The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment.Swedish Journal of Economics 7:42–54.Google Scholar
- Casler, G. L., and J. J. Jacobs. 1975. Cost of altering the quality of water in cayage lake by reducing phosphorus losses from a rural watershed.Journal of the Northeast Agricultural Economics Council 4:174–184.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency. 1973. Methods and practices for controlling water pollution from agricultural nonpoint sources. Office of Water Program Operations, Washington, DC. 83 pp.Google Scholar
- Food and Agricultural Organization ot the United States. 1976. Soils bulletin: prognosis of salinity and alkalinity. Report of an expert consultation. Rome, p. 60.Google Scholar
- Gossett, D. L., and N. K. Whittlesey. 1976. Cost of reducing sediment and nitrogen outflows from irrigated farms to central Washington. Washington State Agricultural Experiment Station research bulletin 824.Google Scholar
- Guitjens, J. C., C. N. Mahannah, and L. F. Tuteur. 1978. Upper Carson River water study. Agricultural Experiment Station report 132. Max C. Fleischmann College of Agriculture, University of Nevada, Reno. 24 pp.Google Scholar
- Heady, E. O., and K. J. Nicol. 1975. Models of land and water allocation to improve environmental and water quality through soil loss controls.Water Resources Research 11: 795–800.Google Scholar
- Horner, G. L. 1975. Internalizing agricultural nitrogen pollution externalities: a case study.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57:33–39.Google Scholar
- Horner, G. L. 1977. An economic analysis of nitrogen reduction in subsurface drainage water. California Agricultural Experiment Station, Giannini Foundation, research report 323.Google Scholar
- Kneese, A. V., and B. T. Bowers. 1968. Managing water quality: economics, technology, and institutions. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Meade, J. 1952. External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation.Economic Journal 62:54–67.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. W., J. C. Guitjens, C. N. Mahannah, and H. M. Joung. 1978. Pollutant contributions from irrigation surface return flows.Journal of Environmental Quality 7:35–40Google Scholar
- Pfeiffer, G. H., and N. K. Whittlesey. 1978. Controlling non-point externalities with input restrictions in an irrigated river basin.Water Resources Bulletin 14:1387–1403.Google Scholar
- Revesz, R. L., and D. H. Marks. 1982. “Second best” effluent fees in water quality management: problems of achieving efficiency. Water Resources Research 18:717–720.Google Scholar
- Richards L. A. (ed). 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of salt affected soils. Ag. HDBK 60, USDA. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 17.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M. J. 1965. Water quality improvement programming problems. Water resources research, fourth quarter.Google Scholar
- Stewart, B. A., D. H. Woolhiser, J. H. Caro, and M. H. Frere. 1976. Control of water pollution from Cropland, vol. I-A, vo. II: an overview. USDA-ARS, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Van Schilfgaard, J. (ed). 1974. Drainage for agriculture. Agronomy no. 17. American Society of Agronomics, Madison, WI, pp. 449–452.Google Scholar