The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 317–330 | Cite as

Studies on chloride permeability of the skin ofLeptodactylus ocellatus: I. Na+ and Cl effect on passive movements of Cl

  • M. V. Ques-von Petery
  • C. A. Rotunno
  • M. Cereijido
Article

Summary

The outflux of chloride through the isolated skin (J 31 Cl ) of the South American frogLeptodactylus ocellatus (L.) is carried by a mechanism that saturates at high concentration of chloride on the inside, and is stimulated by the presence of Cl in the outer solution (trans side). The presence of Na+ on the outside, by itself, does not increaseJ 31 Cl . However, whenJ 31 Cl is already increased by chloride on thetrans side, the addition of Na+ produces a significant further increase. At low concentration of Cl on the outsideJ 31 Cl proceeds through a route which involves changes in electrical parameters. The results suggest that both mechanisms are located on the cell membranes and, therefore, that the fluxes would cross through the cytoplasm of the cells. Na+ stimulates the second mechanism only.

Keywords

Chloride Cell Membrane Human Physiology Electrical Parameter Passive Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Candia, O.A. 1975. Effect of amiloride on Cl fluxes across isolated frog skin. p. 66. Fifth International Biophysics Congress, Copenhagen (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  2. Cereijido, M., Curran, P.F. 1965. Intercellular electrical potentials in frog skin.J. Gen. Physiol. 48:543Google Scholar
  3. Dobson, J.G., Jr., Kidder, G.W., 1968. Edge damage effectin vitro frog skin preparations.Am. J. Physiol. 214:719Google Scholar
  4. Fischbarg, J., Zadunaisky, J.A., Fisch, F.W. 1967. Dependence of sodium frog skin.Am. J. Physiol. 213:963Google Scholar
  5. García Romeu, F. 1971. Anionic and cationic exchange mechanism in the skin of anurans, with special reference to Leptodactylidaein vivo.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 262:163Google Scholar
  6. García Romeu, F., Ehrenfled, J. 1975.In vivo Na+ and Cl independent transport across the skin ofRana esculenta.Am. J. Physiol. 228:839Google Scholar
  7. García Romeu, F., Salibian, A., Pezzani-Hernandez, S. 1969. The nature of thein vivo sodium and chloride uptake mechanisms through the epithelium of the Chilean frogCalyptocephalella gayi (Dum. et Bibr., 1841). Exchanges of hydrogen against sodium and of bicarbonate against chloride.J. Gen. Physiol. 53:816Google Scholar
  8. Gil Ferreira, K.T. 1968. Anionic dependence of sodium transport in the frog skin.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 150:587Google Scholar
  9. Helman, S.I., Miller, D.A. 1973. Edge damage effect on electrical measurement, of frog skin.Am. J. Physiol. 225:972Google Scholar
  10. Helman, S.I., Miller, D.A. 1974. Edge damage effect on measurements of urea and sodium flux in frog skin.Am. J. Physiol. 226:1198Google Scholar
  11. Huf, E.G. 1972. The role of Cl and other anions in active Na+ transport in isolated frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 84:366Google Scholar
  12. Koefoed-Johnsen, V., Levi, H., Ussing, H.H. 1952. The mode of passage of chloride ions through the isolated frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 25:150Google Scholar
  13. Linderholm, H. 1952. Active transport of ions through frog skin with special reference to the action of certain diuretics.Acta Physiol. Scand. 27 (suppl):97Google Scholar
  14. Lindley, B.D., Hoshiko, T. 1964. The effects of alkali metal-cations and common anions on the frog skin potential.J. Gen. Physiol. 47:749Google Scholar
  15. Macey, R.I., Meyers, S. 1963. Dependence of chloride permeability of sodium in the isolated frog skin.Am. J. Physiol 204:1095Google Scholar
  16. Mandel, L.J., Curran, P.F. 1972. Chloride flux via a shunt pathway in frog skin: Apparent exchange diffusion.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 282:258Google Scholar
  17. Nagel, W. 1975. Reinvestigation of intracellular PD of frog skin epithelium. Abstract No. 147, Biophysics Congress, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Rabito, C.A., Rodríguez Boulan, E., Cereijido, M. 1973. Effect of the composition of the inner bathing solution on transport properties of the frog skin.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 311:630Google Scholar
  19. Rodriguez Boulan, E., Ques-von Petery, M.V., Rotunno, C.A., Cereijido, M. 1978. Studies on chloride permeabilities of the skin ofLeptodactylus ocellatus: III. Na+ and Cl effect on electrical phenomena.J. Membrane Biol. 42:345Google Scholar
  20. Rotunno, C.A., Ques-von Petery, M.V., Cereijido, M. 1978. Studies on chloride permeabilities of the skin ofLeptodactylus ocellatus: II. Na+ and Cl effect on inward movements of Cl. J. Membrane Biol.42:331Google Scholar
  21. Schales, O., Schales, S.S. 1941. A simple and accurate method for the determination of chloride in biological fluids.J. Biol. Chem. 140:879Google Scholar
  22. Ussing, H.H., Zerahn, K. 1951. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 23:110Google Scholar
  23. Watlington, C.O., Jessee, F., Jr. 1975. Net Cl flux in short circuited skin ofRana pipiens: Ouabain sensitivity and Na++K+ dependence.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 382:204Google Scholar
  24. Zadunaisky, J.A., Candia, O.A. 1962. Active transport of sodium and chloride by the isolated skin of the South American frogLeptodactylus ocellatus.Nature (London) 195:1004Google Scholar
  25. Zadunaisky, J.A., Candia, O.A., Chiarandini, D.J. 1963. The origin of the short circuit current in the isolated skin of the South American frogLeptodactylus ocellatus.J. Gen. Physiol. 47:393Google Scholar
  26. Zadunaisky, J.A., Fisch, F.W. 1964. Active and passive chloride movements across isolated amphibian skin.Am. J. Physiol. 207:1010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Ques-von Petery
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. A. Rotunno
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Cereijido
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiophysicsAlbert Einstein Center of Medical Research (CIMAE)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del IPN of MéxicoMéxico 14

Personalised recommendations