Protamine alters structure and conductance ofNecturus gallbladder tight junctions without major electrical effects on the apical cell membrane
Protamine is a naturally occurring basic protein (pI; 9.7 to 12.0). We have recently reported that protamine dissolved in the mucosal bath (2 to 20 μm), induces about a twofold increase in transepithelial resistance inNecturus gallbladder within 10 min. Conductance decreased concomitantly with cation selectivity.
In this leaky epithelium, where >90% of an applied current passes between cells, an increment in resistance of this magnitude suggests a paracellular actiona priori. To confirm this, ionic conductance across the apical cell membrane was studied with microelectrodes. Protamine increased transepithelial resistance without changing apical cell membrane voltage or fractional membrane resistance. Variation in extracellular K concentration (6 to 50mm) caused changes in apical membrane voltage not different from control.
To determine if protamine-induced resistance changes were associated with structural alteration of tight junctions, gallbladders were fixedin situ at peak response and analyzed by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. According to a morphometrical analysis, the tight junctional intramembranous domain expands vertically due to incorporation of new strands (fibrils) into the main compact fibrillar meshwork.
Since morphologic changes are complete within 10 min, strands are probably recycled into and out of the tight junctional membrane domain possibly by the cytoskeleton either from cytoplasmic vesicles or from intramembranous precursors. Regulation of tight junctional permeability by protamine and other perturbations may constitute a common mechanism by which leaky epithelia regulate transport, and protamine, in concentrations employed in this study, seems reasonably specific for the tight junction.
Key Wordsprotamine tight junction transepithelial resistance tight junction morphology tight junction strands Necturus gallbladder
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boulpaep, E.L., Sackin, H. 1980. Electrical analysis of intraepithelial barriers.In: Current Topics in Membrane and Transport. F. Bronner, A. Kleinzeller, and E.L. Boulpaep, editors. pp. 169–197. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Claude, P. 1978. Morphological factors influencing transepithelial permeability: A model for the resistance of the zonula occludens.J. Membrane Biol. 39:219–232Google Scholar
- Duffey, M.E., Hainau, B., Ho, S., Bentzel, C.J. 1981. Regulation of epithelial tight junction permeability by cyclic AMP.Nature (London) 294:451–453Google Scholar
- Fromm, M., Palant, C.E., Bentzel, C.J., Hegel, U. 1985. Protamine reversibly decreases paracellular cation permeability inNecturus gallbladder.J. Membrane Biol. 87:141–150Google Scholar
- Fromm, M., Weskamp, P., Hegel, U. 1980. Versatile piezoelectric driver for cell puncture.Pfluegers Arch. 384:69–73Google Scholar
- Graf, J., Giebisch, G. 1979. Intracellular sodium activity and sodium transport inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Membrane Biol. 47:327–355Google Scholar
- Kachar, B., Reese, T.S. 1982. Evidence for the lipidic nature of tight junction strands.Nature (London) 296:464–466Google Scholar
- Nagel, W., Garcia-Diaz, F.J., Essig, A. 1983. Contribution of junctional conductance to the cellular voltage-divider ratio in frog skins.Pfluegers Arch. 399:336–341Google Scholar
- Poler, S.M., Reuss, L. 1985. Protamine decreases apical membrane K+ and increases apical membrane Cl− conductance inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Gen. Physiol. 86:42aGoogle Scholar
- Reuss, L., Finn, A.L. 1975. Electrical properties of the cellular transepithelial pathway inNecturus gallbladder: I. Circuit analysis and steady-state effects of mucosal solution ionic substitutions.J. Membrane Biol. 25:115–139Google Scholar
- Reuss, L., Grady, T.P. 1979. Triaminopyrimidinium (TAP+) blocks luminal membrane K conductance inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Membrane Biol. 48:285–298Google Scholar
- Suzuki, K., Frömter, E. 1977. The potential and resistance profile ofNecturus gallbladder cells.Pfluegers Arch. 371:109–117Google Scholar