The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 9–20 | Cite as

Protamine alters structure and conductance ofNecturus gallbladder tight junctions without major electrical effects on the apical cell membrane

  • Carl J. Bentzel
  • Michael Fromm
  • Carlos E. Palant
  • Ulrich Hegel


Protamine is a naturally occurring basic protein (pI; 9.7 to 12.0). We have recently reported that protamine dissolved in the mucosal bath (2 to 20 μm), induces about a twofold increase in transepithelial resistance inNecturus gallbladder within 10 min. Conductance decreased concomitantly with cation selectivity.

In this leaky epithelium, where >90% of an applied current passes between cells, an increment in resistance of this magnitude suggests a paracellular actiona priori. To confirm this, ionic conductance across the apical cell membrane was studied with microelectrodes. Protamine increased transepithelial resistance without changing apical cell membrane voltage or fractional membrane resistance. Variation in extracellular K concentration (6 to 50mm) caused changes in apical membrane voltage not different from control.

To determine if protamine-induced resistance changes were associated with structural alteration of tight junctions, gallbladders were fixedin situ at peak response and analyzed by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. According to a morphometrical analysis, the tight junctional intramembranous domain expands vertically due to incorporation of new strands (fibrils) into the main compact fibrillar meshwork.

Since morphologic changes are complete within 10 min, strands are probably recycled into and out of the tight junctional membrane domain possibly by the cytoskeleton either from cytoplasmic vesicles or from intramembranous precursors. Regulation of tight junctional permeability by protamine and other perturbations may constitute a common mechanism by which leaky epithelia regulate transport, and protamine, in concentrations employed in this study, seems reasonably specific for the tight junction.

Key Words

protamine tight junction transepithelial resistance tight junction morphology tight junction strands Necturus gallbladder 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alavi, N., Lianos, E.A., Palant, C.E., Bentzel, C.J. 1983. Induction of epithelial tight junctions by a light chain protein isolated from a patient with Fanconi's syndrome.Nephron 35:130–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentzel, C.J., Hainau, B., Ho, S., Hui, S.W., Edelman, A., Anagnostopoulos, T., Benedetti, E.L. 1980. Cytoplasmic regulation of tight-junction permeability: Effect of plant cytokinins.Am. J. Physiol. 239:C75-C89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulpaep, E.L., Sackin, H. 1980. Electrical analysis of intraepithelial barriers.In: Current Topics in Membrane and Transport. F. Bronner, A. Kleinzeller, and E.L. Boulpaep, editors. pp. 169–197. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chalcroft, J.P., Bullivant, S. 1970. An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture.J. Cell. Biol. 47:49–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Claude, P. 1978. Morphological factors influencing transepithelial permeability: A model for the resistance of the zonula occludens.J. Membrane Biol. 39:219–232Google Scholar
  6. Duffey, M.E., Hainau, B., Ho, S., Bentzel, C.J. 1981. Regulation of epithelial tight junction permeability by cyclic AMP.Nature (London) 294:451–453Google Scholar
  7. Fromm, M., Palant, C.E., Bentzel, C.J., Hegel, U. 1985. Protamine reversibly decreases paracellular cation permeability inNecturus gallbladder.J. Membrane Biol. 87:141–150Google Scholar
  8. Fromm, M., Weskamp, P., Hegel, U. 1980. Versatile piezoelectric driver for cell puncture.Pfluegers Arch. 384:69–73Google Scholar
  9. Graf, J., Giebisch, G. 1979. Intracellular sodium activity and sodium transport inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Membrane Biol. 47:327–355Google Scholar
  10. Kachar, B., Reese, T.S. 1982. Evidence for the lipidic nature of tight junction strands.Nature (London) 296:464–466Google Scholar
  11. Madara, J.L. 1983. Increases in guinea pig small intestinal transepithelial resistance induced by osmotic loads are accompanied by rapid alterations in absorptive-cell tight junction structure.J. Cell Biol. 97:125–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Martinez-Palomo, A., Meza, I., Beaty, G., Cereijido, M. 1980. Experimental modulation of occluding junctions in a cultured transporting epithelium.J. Cell. Biol. 87:736–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meza, I., Ibarra, G., Sabanero, M., Martinez-Palomo, A., Cereijido, M. 1980. Occluding junctions and cytoskeletal components in a cultured transporting epithelium.J. Cell Biol. 87:746–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meza, I., Sabanero, M., Stefani, E., Cereijido, M. 1982. Occluding junctions in MDCK cells: Modulation of transepithelial permeability of transepithelial permeability by the cytoskeleton.J. Cell Biochem. 18:407–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moreno, J.H. 1975. Blockage of gallbladder tight junction cation-selective channels by 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidinium (TAP).J. Gen. Physiol. 66:97–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Muller, J., Kachadorian, W.A., DiScala, V.A. 1980. Evidence that ADH-stimulated intramembrane particle aggregates are transferred from cytoplasmic to luminal membranes in toad bladder epithelial cells.J. Cell Biol. 85:83–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagel, W., Garcia-Diaz, F.J., Essig, A. 1983. Contribution of junctional conductance to the cellular voltage-divider ratio in frog skins.Pfluegers Arch. 399:336–341Google Scholar
  18. Palant, C.E., Duffey, M.E., Mookerjee, B.K., Bentzel, C.J. 1983. Ca2+ regulation of tight-junction permeability and structure inNecturus gallbladder.Am. J. Physiol. 245:C203-C212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Poler, S.M., Reuss, L. 1985. Protamine decreases apical membrane K+ and increases apical membrane Cl conductance inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Gen. Physiol. 86:42aGoogle Scholar
  20. Reuss, L., Finn, A.L. 1975. Electrical properties of the cellular transepithelial pathway inNecturus gallbladder: I. Circuit analysis and steady-state effects of mucosal solution ionic substitutions.J. Membrane Biol. 25:115–139Google Scholar
  21. Reuss, L., Grady, T.P. 1979. Triaminopyrimidinium (TAP+) blocks luminal membrane K conductance inNecturus gallbladder epithelium.J. Membrane Biol. 48:285–298Google Scholar
  22. Suzuki, K., Frömter, E. 1977. The potential and resistance profile ofNecturus gallbladder cells.Pfluegers Arch. 371:109–117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl J. Bentzel
    • 1
  • Michael Fromm
    • 2
  • Carlos E. Palant
    • 3
  • Ulrich Hegel
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Renal Medicine, School of MedicineEast Carolina UniversityGreenville
  2. 2.Institut für Klinische PhysiologieFreie Universität BerlinBerlin 45Federal Republic of Germany
  3. 3.Nephrology DivisionSepulveda VA Medical CenterSepulveda

Personalised recommendations