Environmental Management

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 397–403 | Cite as

The effects of military tank traffic on prairie: A management model

  • Scott D. Wilson
Research

Abstract

The effect of various frequencies and seasons of military tank traffic on native mixed-grass prairie was examined in a randomized and replicated field experiment. Vegetation (in 10×10 m plots) was subjected to tank traffic at the following rates: (a) one pass per day of training from May until August; (b) one pass per day in May and June; (c) one pass per day in July and August; (d) one pass every three weeks from May until August; (e) zero (control). Species composition and the amount of bare ground were found to vary significantly with traffic frequency. Plant species alien to North America invaded plots subjected to spring driving. Regression analysis showed spring driving to produce more bare ground than summer driving. The regression models suggested that much higher intensities of training could be conducted without damage if spring driving were avoided. Regression models were also used to estimate the frequency of traffic associated with a significant change in species composition, where species composition was expressed as the ratio ofBouteloua gracilis toStipa spartea, an indicator of disturbance-induced change in prairie vegetation. This relationship predicted the capacity of the vegetation of a training area of any given width to support tank traffic without changing species composition. The predictive ability of the model was tested by comparing predicted traffic capacities with the amount of traffic actually applied to two training areas in 1986. Where traffic capacity was exceeded, the model successfully predicted a significantly higher frequency of bare ground and ratio ofBouteloua gracilis toStipa spartea.

Key words

Prairie Military tanks Experiment Predictive model Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Anderson, M. L., and A. W. Bailey. 1979. Effect of fire on aSymphoricarpos occidentalis shrub community in central Alberta.Canadian Journal of Botany 57:2819–2823.Google Scholar
  2. Beare, H. T. 1972. The effect of tracked vehicle traversal on the soil physical properties of prairie terrain. Suffield Unclassified Memorandum 1/72. Defence Research Establishment Suffield, Ralston, Alberta.Google Scholar
  3. Best, K. F., G. G. Bowes, A. G. Thomas, and M. G. Maw. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 39.Euphorbia esula L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60:651–663.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, R. D., 1927. A preliminary ecological survey of the district surrounding the entomological station at Treesbank, Manitoba.Ecology 8:207–220.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. A., and S. S. Waller. 1986. The impact of experimental design on the application of grazing research results.Journal of Range Management 39:197–200.Google Scholar
  6. Bultsma, P. M., and R. G. Lym. 1985. Survey for spotted knapweed in North Dakota.North Dakota Farm Research 43:19–22.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, S. E., E. W. Tisdale, and N. A. Skoglund. 1947. The effects of climate and grazing practices on short-grass prairie vegetation in southern Saskatchewan. Canada Department of Agriculture Technical Publication no. 46, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  8. Coupland, R. T. 1950. Ecology of mixed prairie in Canada.Ecological Monographs 20:271–315.Google Scholar
  9. Diersing, V. E., and W. D. Severinghaus. 1985. Wildlife as an indicator of site quality and site trafficability during army training maneuvers. US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Report N-86/03.Google Scholar
  10. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments.Ecological Monographs 54:187–211.Google Scholar
  11. Larson, F., and W. Whitman. 1942. A comparison of used and unused grassland mesas in the badlands of South Dakota.Ecology 23:438–445.Google Scholar
  12. McKeman, J. M. 1984. Effects of military training on mixedgrass prairie at Shilo, Manitoba, Canada, and utility of remedial seeding measures. M.S. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.Google Scholar
  13. Redmann, R. E. 1975. Production ecology of grassland plant communities in western North Dakota.Ecological Monographs 45:83–106.Google Scholar
  14. Risser, P. G., E. C. Birney, H. D. Blocker, S. W. May, W. J. Parton, and J. A. Wiens. 1981. The true prairie ecosystem. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., Stroudsberg, PA.Google Scholar
  15. Scoggan, H. J. 1957. Flora of Manitoba. National Museum of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  16. Severinghaus, W. D., and W. D. Goran. 1981. Effects of tactical vehicle activity on the mammals, birds and vegetation at Fort Lewis, Washington. US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Report N-116, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  17. Severinghaus, W. D., W. D. Goran, G. D. Schnell, and F. L. Johnson. 1981. Effects of tactical vehicle activity on the mammals, birds and vegetation at Fort Hood, Texas. US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Report N-113, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  18. Smoliak, S. 1965. A comparison of ungrazed and lightly grazedStipa-Bouteloua prairie in southeastern Alberta.Canadian Journal of Plant Science 45:270–275.Google Scholar
  19. Smoliak, S., M. R. Kilcher, R. W. Lodge, and A. Johnston. 1982. Management of prairie rangeland. Publication 1589/ E, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  20. Weaver, J. E. 1954. North American prairie. Johnsen Publishing Co., Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
  21. Weaver, J. E. 1968. Prairie plants and their environment. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
  22. Webb, R. H., and Wilshire, H. G. (Eds.). 1983. Environmental effects of off-road vehicles. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott D. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations