Environmental Management

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 11–17 | Cite as

Problems with using overlay mapping for planning and their implications for geographic information systems

  • Robert G. Bailey

Abstract

As part of the planning process, maps of natural factors are often superimposed in order to identify areas which are suitable or unsuitable for a particular type of resource management. Overlay maps may also be used to identify analysis areas for predictive modeling of resource productivity and ecological response to management. Current interest in applying computer-assisted mapping technology to making overlay maps is drawing attention to geographic information systems for this purpose. The resultant maps, however, may be so inaccurate or unable to capture significant units of productivity and ecological response that they could lead to imperfect or false conclusions. Recommendations are made on how to proceed in light of these problems.

Key words

Land suitability Geographic information systems Landscape ecology Resource planning model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Aandahl, A. R., and A. Herrwagen. 1964. Parallelism in the development of soil survey and range site concepts. American Society of Agronomy.ASA Special Publications 5:137–146.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. G. 1985. The factor of scale in ecosystem mapping.Environmental Management 9:271–276.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, R. G. 1987. Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale ecosystem mapping.Landscape and Urban Planning 14:313–319.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, J. K., and J. K. Sailor. 1987. Use of a geographic information system for storm runoff prediction for small urban watersheds.Environmental Management 11:21–27.Google Scholar
  5. Dangermond, J., B. Derrenbacher, and E. Harnden. 1982. Description of techniques for automation of regional natural resource inventories. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California. 52 pp. (mimeo).Google Scholar
  6. Davis, L. S. 1980. Strategy for building a location-specific, multi-purpose information system for wildland management.Journal of Forestry 78:402–408.Google Scholar
  7. FAO. 1984.Land evaluation for forestry. FAO Forestry Paper 48, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 123 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, B. K. 1981. The use of overlays in site quality mapping.Canadian Journal of Forest Research 11:361–369.Google Scholar
  9. Gersmehl, P. J. 1980. Productivity ratings based on soil series: a methodology critique.Professional Geographer 32:158–163.Google Scholar
  10. Hole, F. D., and J. B. Campbell. 1985. Soil landscape analysis. Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, NJ, 196 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation.Journal American Institute of Planners 43:386–400.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, K. N., T. W. Stuart, and S. A. Crim. 1986. FOR-PLAN version 2: an overview. USDA Forest Service, Land Management Planning Staff, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Larson, K. N., R. W. Phillips, J. E. Schmautz, E. H. Stone, and D. J. Wright. 1977. A method for identifying the suitability of lands for resource management. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 11 pp. (mimeo).Google Scholar
  14. MacDougall, E. B. 1975. The accuracy of map overlays.Landscape Planning 2:23–30.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, F. C. 1985. Using a geographic information system for forest land mapping and management.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 51:1753–1759.Google Scholar
  16. Moss, M. R. 1985. Land processes and land classification.Journal of Environmental Management 20:295–319.Google Scholar
  17. Omi, P. N., L. C. Wensel, and J. L. Murphy. 1979. An application of multivariate statistics to land-use planning: classifying land units into homogeneous zones.Forest Science 25:399–414.Google Scholar
  18. Rowe, J. S. 1980. The common denominator in land classification in Canada: an ecological approach to mapping.Forestry Chronicle 56:19–20.Google Scholar
  19. Steiner, F. 1983. Resource suitability: methods for analysis.Environmental Management 7:401–420.Google Scholar
  20. Tomlin, C. D., J. K. Berry, and S. M. Tomlin. 1981. Fundamental overlay mapping techniques. Pages 470–481in T. B. Brann (ed.), Proceedings, Workshop In-Place Resource Inventories: Principles and Practices, August 9–14, 1981, Orono, Maine. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Varnes, D. J. 1974. The logic of geological maps with reference to their interpretation and use for engineering purposes. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 837, Washington, DC, 48 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Bailey
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA Forest ServiceWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Land Management Planning Systems, USDA Forest ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations