Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 119–126 | Cite as

Remote sensing of coastal food resources

  • V. Klemas
  • D. S. Bartlett
Research
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Since tidal marshes and estuaries cover large areas of the world's coasts and exhibit a very high net primary productivity, they offer a most important food source for an ever increasing world population. The food web of numerous estuaries and coastal waters is based on the primary productivity of coastal marshes that constitute centers of solar energy fixation and an important link in the mineral cycles. The fixed carbon and minerals enterthe water primarily as detritus where a complex food web makes them accessible to commercially important fish and benthic communities. With the launch of LANDSAT, NOAA-2, and Skylab, relatively high resolution spacecraft data became available for mapping and inventorying tidal marshes and their productivity on a global scale. Upwelling regions that attract large fish populations as well as other coastal water properties relating to the presence of finfish, Crustacea, and shellfish could be identified and observed. Using multispectral analysis techniques, classification accuracies greater than 80 percent have been obtained for most marsh plant species, and greater than 90 percent for key types such asSpartina alterniflora, which is the primary producer in large tide marshes of the coastal eastern USA. The capacity of remote sensors on spacecraft such as NOAA-2, LANDSAT, and Skylab to assess coastal food resources on a global scale is discussed from the point of view of resolution, classification accuracy, and cost effectiveness.

Key words

Remote sensing Coastal productivity Natural resources LANDSAT Skylab Wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Anderson, R. R., L. Alsid, and V. Carter. 1975. Comparative utility of Landsat-1 and Skylab data for coastal wetland mapping and ecological studies. Pages 469–478in Proc. of NASA Earth Resources Survey Symp., Vol. III, Summary Reports. NASA, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. R., and F. J. Wobber. 1973. Wetlands mapping in New Jersey. Photogrammetric Engineering 39(4):353–358.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, V. J. 1975. Mangrove vegetation. Cramer, Lehre. Bremerhaven. 425 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, G. L., G. C. Ewing, and C. J. Lorenzen. 1969. Remote measurement of ocean color as an index of biological productivity. Pages 991–1002in Proc. of 6th International Symp. on Remote Sensing of the Environment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, G. L., G. C. Ewing, and C. J. Lorenzen. 1970. Spectra of backscattered light from the sea obtained from aircraft as a measure of chlorophyll concentration. Science 167:1119–1121.Google Scholar
  6. Daiber, F. C., and G. F. Somers. 1976. Halophytic plants: an undeveloped resource. University of Delaware Sea Grant Position Paper. Newark, DE. 2 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Egan, W. G., and M. E. Hair. 1973. Automated delineation of wetlands in photographic remote sensing. Pages 2231–2251in Proc. of 7th International Symp. on Remote Sensing of Environment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  8. Erb, R. B. 1974. The ERTS-1 investigation (ER-600): ERTS-1 coastal/estuarine analysis. NASA Report TMX-58118. Houston, Texas. 258 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Fairbridge, R. W. 1966. The encyclopedia of oceanography. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York. 1021 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Kemmerer, A. J. 1976. An application of color remote sensing to fisheries.In: Summary Report of The Ocean Color Workshop. NOAA-AMOL. Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  11. Klemas, V. 1976. Remote sensing of wetlands vegetation and estuarine water properties. Pages 381–403in, ed. Estuarine processes, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Klemas, V., D. Bartlett, and R. Rogers 1975. Coastal zone classification from satellite imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 41(3):499–512.Google Scholar
  13. Klemas, V., D. Bartlett, and R. Rogers. 1976. Skylab and ERTS-1 investigations of coastal land-use and water properties in Delaware Bay. Pages 351–371in M. I. Kent, E. Stuhlinger, and S-T. Wu, eds. Scientific investigations on the Skylab satellite (Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 48).Google Scholar
  14. Kolipinski, M. C., A. L. Higer, N. S. Thomson, and F. J. Thomson. 1969. Inventory of hydrobiological features using automatically processed multispectral data. Page 79in Proc. of 6th International Symp. on Remote Sensing of Environment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  15. La Violette, P. E. 1974. A satellite-aircraft thermal study of the upwelled waters off Spanish Sahara. J. Physical Oceanography 4:676–684.Google Scholar
  16. McEwen, R. B., W. J. Kosco, and V. Carter. 1976. Coastal wetland mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 42(2):221–232.Google Scholar
  17. Maul, G. A. 1974. Applications of ERTS data to oceanography and marine environment. Pages 335–347in Proc. of COSPAR Symp. on Earth Survey Problems. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. 574 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Proc. of the Symp. on Remote Sensing in Marine Biology and Fishery Resources. 1971. Texas A & M University Publ. TAMU-SG-71-106. College Station, Texas. 299 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Reimold, R. J., J. L. Gallagher, and D. E. Thomson. 1973. Remote sensing of tidal marsh. Photogrammetric Engineering 39(5):477–489.Google Scholar
  21. Russell-Hunter, W. D. 1970. Aquatic productivity. MacMillan Co., London. 306 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Savastano, K. J., and T. D. Leming. 1975. The feasibility of utilizing remotely sensed data to assess and monitor oceanic gamefish.In: Proceeding of the NASA Earth Resources Survey Symposium. Vol. I-D. Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  23. Szekielda, K. -H., D. J. Suszkowski, and P. S. Tabor. 1975. Skylab investigation of the upwelling off the northwest coast of Africa. Pages 2005–2022in Proc. of the NASA Earth Resources Survey Symp. NASA, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Klemas
    • 1
  • D. S. Bartlett
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Marine StudiesUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations