Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 31–53 | Cite as

Anger management style, degree of expressed Anger, and gender influence cardiovascular recovery from interpersonal harassment

  • Samantha D. Faber
  • John W. Burns


The hypothesis that the degree to which individuals expressed anger during harassment would mediate relationships between anger management style and cardiovascular recovery from harassment was examined in a college sample of 31 men and 32 women. Subjects told stories about Thematic Apperception Test cards during nonharassment and harassment phases. Words spoken during the storytelling reflecting “aggressive behavior” and “angry/hostile affect” were coded from audiotapes. Responses on the Anger-out subscale (AOS) of the Anger Expression Inventory were positively correlated with expression of angry/hostile affect words, and with SBP increases during harassment. During recovery, high AOS men and low AOS women showed sustained SBP, while men who expressed much anger and women who expressed little anger showed sustained SBP. Additional tests provided support for the hypothesis: SBP responses of high AOS men and low AOS women during recovery were partly mediated by the degree to which subjects expressed anger during harassment.

Key Words

anger management expressed anger CVR gender differences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth-Kewley, S., and Friedman, H. S. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart diseases: A quantitative review.Psychol. Bull. 101: 343–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, J. W., and Katkin, E. S. (1993). Psychological, situational, and gender predictors of cardiovascular reactivity to stress: A multivariate approach.J. Behav. Med., 16: 445–465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Cramer, P. (1991). Anger and the use of defense mechanisms in college students.J. Personal. 59: 39–55.Google Scholar
  6. Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Haney, T. L., and Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Relationship to angiographic findings.Psychosom. Med. 47: 219–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T., and Grandits, G. A. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiople Risk Factor Intervention Trial.Psychosom. Med. 51: 514–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond, E. L. (1982). The role of anger and hostility in essential hypertension and coronary heart disease.Psychol. Bull. 92: 410–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Engebretson, T. O., Matthews, K. A., and Scheier, M. F. (1989). Relations between anger expression and cardiovascular reactivity: Reconciling inconsistent findings through a matching hypothesis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 57: 513–521.Google Scholar
  10. Hartmann, D. P. (1977). Considerations in the use of interobserver reliability estimates.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 10: 103–116.Google Scholar
  11. Hecker, M. H. L., Chesney, M. A., Black, G. W., and Frautschi, N. (1988). Coronary prone behaviors in the Western Collaborative Group Study.Psychosom. Med. 50: 153–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hokanson, J. E. (1970). Psychophysiological evaluation of the catharsis hypothesis. In Megargee, E. L., and Hokanson, J. E. (eds.),The dynamics of aggression, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Holroyd, K. A., and Gorkin, L. (1983). Young adults at risk for hypertension: Effects of family history and anger management in determining responses to interpersonal conflict.J. Psychosom. Res. 27: 131–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Keinan, G., Ben-Zur, H., Zilka, M., and Carel, R. S. (1992). Anger in or out, which is healthier? An attempt to reconcile inconsistent findings.Psychol. Health 7: 83–98.Google Scholar
  15. Krantz, D. S., and Manuck, S. B. (1984). Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic critique.Psychol. Bull. 96: 435–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lai, J. Y., and Linden, W. (1992). Gender, anger expression style, and opportunity for anger release determine cardiovascular reaction to and recovery from anger provocation.Psychosom. Med. 54: 297–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., and Krantz, D. S. (1981). Effects of challenges on pressor and heart rate responses in Type A and B women.Psychophysiology 18: 1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., Dimsdale, J. E., and Hacket, T. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Further relationships to angiographic findings.Health Psychol. 24: 137–152.Google Scholar
  19. Matthews, K. A. (1988). Coronary heart disease and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review.Psychol. Bull. 104: 373–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews, K. A., Glass, D. C., Rosenman, R. H., and Bortner, R. W. (1977). Competitive drive, pattern A, and coronary heart disease: A further analysis of some data from the Western Collaborative Group Study.J. Chron. Dis. 30: 489–498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, H. A. (1943).Manual of Thematic Apperception Test, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  22. Siegman, A. W. (1993). Cardiovascular consequences of expressing, experiencing, and repressing anger.J. Behav. Med. 16: 539–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Siegman, A. W., and Anderson, R. (1990). Dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity: The role of provocation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society, Boston, MA, March.Google Scholar
  24. Siegman, A. W., Dembroski, T. M., and Ringel, N. (1987). Components of hostility and the severity of coronary artery disease.Psychosom. Med. 49: 127–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Siegman, A. W., Anderson, R., Herbst, J., Boyle, S., and Wilkinson, J. (1993). Dimensions of anger-hostility and cardiovascular reactivity in provoked men.J. Behav. Med. 15: 257–272.Google Scholar
  26. Spicer, J., Jackson, R., and Scragg, R. (1993). The effects of anger management and social contact on risk of myocardial infarction in Type As and Type Bs.Psychol. Health 8: 243–255.Google Scholar
  27. Spielberger, C. D., Johnson, E. H., Russell, S. F., Crane, R. J., Jacobs, G. A., and Worden, T. J. (1985). The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In Chesney, M. A., and Rosenman, R. H. (eds.),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders, Hemisphere, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Suarez, E. C., and Williams, R. B. (1989). Situational determinants of cardiovascular and emotional reactivity in high and low hostile men.Psychosom. Med. 51: 404–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Suarez, E. C., and Williams, R. B. (1990). The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics.Psychosom. Med. 52: 558–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas, S. P., and Williams, R. L. (1991). Perceived stress, trait anger, modes of anger expression, and health status of college men and women.Nurs. Res. 40: 303–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vogele, C., and Steptoe, A. (1993). Anger inhibition and family history as modulators of cardiovascular responses to mental stress in adolescent boys.J. Psychosom. Res. 37: 503–514.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha D. Faber
    • 1
  • John W. Burns
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Building 51Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical SchoolNorth Chicago

Personalised recommendations