Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 589–604 | Cite as

Effects of dietary fat feedback on behavioral and psychological variables

  • Deborah J. Bowen
  • Elizabeth Fries
  • Helen P. Hopp
Article

Abstract

This paper reports on the immediate and delayed reactions to dietary fat consumption feedback. Subjects in our study received (1) personalized dietary fat feedback and (2) information about how to alter their fat consumption. Fat consumption was measured using a brief fat assessment instrument. Subjects were categorized into three risk groups: at or below, above, and significantly above the recommended level. Emotional, cognitive, and behavioral reactions were measured immediately after receiving feedback and at 1 month postfeedback. Subjects who received high fat feedback showed greater negative emotional distress in response to the feedback and stated that they knew less about high-fat foods than subjects receiving lower feedback. By the 1-month follow-up, subjects in the highest feedback condition were least likely to report intentions to lower their dietary fat. Interventions designed to alter dietary fat consumption should take into account the emotional and cognitive consequences of risk factor feedback.

Key Words

fat consumption feedback risk-factor feedback dietary behavior change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, V., and Fitzgerald, B. (1980).Guidebook for Nutrition Counselors, Christopher Publishing House, North Quincy, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, D. J., and Tinker, L. F. (in press). Controversies in dietary behavior change. In F. Bronner (Ed.),Controversies in Nutrition. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, D. J., Meischke, H., and Tomoyasu, N. (1994). Defining the processes of low-fat dietary change,Health Educ. Res 9: 172–183.Google Scholar
  5. Croyle, R. T., and Jemmott, J. B. (1991). Psychological reactions to risk factor testing. In Skelton and Croyle, R. T. (eds.),Mental Representation in Health and Illness, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Curry, S. J., Kristal, A. R., and Bowen, D. J. (1992). An application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction.Health Educ. Q. 7: 97–105.Google Scholar
  7. Hopp, H. (1991). Cholesterol Labeling: Psychological Responses to Risk Factor Feedback, Unpublished dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  8. Kristal, A. R., Shattuck, A. L., Henry, H. J., and Fowler, A. (1990). Rapid assessment of dietary intake of fat, fiber, and saturated fat: Validity of an instrument suitable for community intervention research and nutritional surveillance.Am. J. Health Promot. 4: 288–295.Google Scholar
  9. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Leventhal, H., and Cameron, L. (1987). Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance.Patient Educ. Counsel. 10: 117–138.Google Scholar
  11. MacDonald, L. A., Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., and Taylor, D. W. (1984). Labeling in hypertension: A review of the behavioral and psychological consequences.J. Chron. Dis. 37: 933–942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. National Center for Health Statistics (1983).Dietary Intake Source Data: United States, 1976–80. (DHHS Publication No. PHS 83-1681), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. National Cholesterol Education Program (1990).Report of the Expert Panel on Population Strategies for Blood Cholesterol Reduction, NIH Publ. No. 90-3046, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council (1986).What is America Eating? National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. National Research Council (1989).Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Owen, A., and Frankle, R. (1986).Nutrition in the Community: The Art of Delivering Services, 2nd ed, Times Mirror/Mosby, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., and Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model.Health Educ. Q. 17: 175–183.Google Scholar
  17. Sackett, D. L., MacDonald, L., Haynes, R. B., and Taylor, D. W. (1983). Labeling of hypertensive patients.N. Engl. J. Med. 309: 1253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanders, G. S. (1982). Social comparison and perceptions of health and illness. In Sanders, G. S., and Suls, J. (eds.),Social Psychology of Health and Illness, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. Simko, M. D., Cowell, C., and Gilbride, J. A. (1984).Nutrition Assessment: A Comprehensive Guide for Planning Intervention, Aspen, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognition adaptation.Am. Psychol. 1161–1173.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor, S. E., Buunk, B. P., and Aspinwall, L. G. (1990). Social comparison, stress, and coping.Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 16: 74–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah J. Bowen
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Fries
    • 1
  • Helen P. Hopp
    • 2
  1. 1.Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterLoma Linda UniversityLoma Linda
  2. 2.School of Public HealthLoma Linda UniversityLoma Linda

Personalised recommendations