Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 21–37 | Cite as

Nonlinear dynamics of paleocortex manifested in the olfactory EEG

  • Walter J. Freeman


The olfactory bulb is the first central component in a highly sensitive yet markedly stable sensory system. It receives a surge of receptor activity with each inspiration and transmits output as a brief burst of oscillatory activity that is most clearly seen in the EEG. These properties together with the known anatomy and physiology of the bulb are used as design criteria to synthesize, evaluate and solve a set of nonlinear differential equations that represent lumped bulbar dynamics. According to the model bulbar processing is in two stages. In the outer layers the interneurons perform the operations of input range compression, integration, clipping, holding, and bias control. In the inner layers the input surge is converted to a burst, which is transmitted by the mitral cells as a pulse density wave. The phase, frequency, duration, and amplitude of the wave convey information centrally about both the input and the state of the system. The model suffices to replicate the forms of the EEG burst; the pulse probability distributions conditional on the EEG; the waveforms of averaged evoked potentials (AEPs) and post stimulus time (PST) histograms from the bulb and cortex; and the changes in waveform induced by behavioral control of attentiveness and habituation. It is inferred that with selective attention there is a permanent change in the strength of mutually excitatory connections among excitatory neurons, and that with habituation there is a reversible change in the effectiveness of excitatory synapses. The limitations and deficiencies of the model and the need for centrifugal controls of bulbocortical function are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahn, S.M., Freeman, W.J.: Steady-state and limit cycle activity of mass of neurons forming simple feedback loops (I): Lumped circuit model. Kybernetik16, 87–91 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn, S.M., Freeman, W.J.: Steady state and limit cycle activity of mass of neurons forming simple feedback loops (II): Distributed parameter model. Kybernetik16, 127–132 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Adrian, E.G.: The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.2, 377–388 (1950)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biedenbach, M.A.: Effects of anesthetics and cholinergic drugs on prepyriform electrical activity in cats. Exp. Neurol.16, 464–479 (1966)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Emery, J.D., Freeman, W.J.: Pattern analysis of cortical evoked potential parameters during attention changes. Physiol. Behav.4, 69–77 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, W.J.: Phasic and long-term excitability changes in prepyriform cortex of cats. Exp. Neurol.5, 500–518 (1962)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, W.J.: Relation of glomerular neuronal activity to glomerular transmission attenuation. Brain Res.65, 91–107 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, W.J.: Mass Action in the nervous system: Examination of the neurophysiological basis of adaptive behavior through the EEG. New York: Academic Press 1975Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, W.J.: Spatial properties of an EEG event in the olfactory bulb and cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.44, 586–605 (1978)Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, W.J.: Nonlinear gain mediating cortical stimulus-response relations. Biol. Cybernetics33, 237–247 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. Getchell, T.V., Shepherd, G.M.: Short-axon cells in the olfactory bulb: Dendrodendritic synaptic interactions. J. Phys.251, 523–548 (1975)Google Scholar
  12. Granit, R., Kernell, D., Shortess, G.K.: Quantitative aspects of repetitive firing of mammalian motoneurones caused by injected currents. J. Physiol.168, 911–931 (1963)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgkin, A.L.: The subthreshold potentials in a crustacean nerve fibre. Proc. R. Soc. London126, 87 (1938)Google Scholar
  14. Libet, B., Gerard, R.W.: Control of the potential rhythm of the isolated frog brain. J. Neurophysiol.2, 153–169 (1939)Google Scholar
  15. Nishi, S., Minota, S., Karczmar, A.G.: Primary afferent neurons. The ionic mechanism of GABA-mediated depolarization Neuropharmacology13, 215–219 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramon y Cajal, Santiago: Algunas conjeturas sobre el mecanismo anatómico de la asociación, ideación, y atención. Rev. Med. Cir. Práct. 37–105 (1895)Google Scholar
  17. Ramon y Cajal, Santiago: Histologie du système nerveux de l'homme et des vertébrés (2 vol.). Tr. L. Azoulay. Paris: A. Maloine 1909–1911Google Scholar
  18. Roitbak, A.J., Khechinashvili, S.N.: On the mechanisms of E.D. Adrian's electrical activity of mammalian olfactory bulb (in Russian). J. Physiol. (USSR)38, 350–365 (1952)Google Scholar
  19. Rushton, W.A.: Visual adaptation. The Ferrier lecture, 1962. Proc. Soc. London, Ser. B162, 20–46 (1965)Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt, R.F.: Pharmacological studies on the primary afferent depolarization of the toad spinal cord. Pflügers Arch. Ges. Physiol.277, 325–346 (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Shepherd, G.M.: Synaptic organization of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol. Rev.52, 864–917 (1972)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sunday, D.M., Freeman, W.J.: Nonlinear coupling of wave and pulse activity in a neural mass. Physiologist18, 42 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. Wall, P.D.: Presynaptic control of impulses at the first central synapse in the cutaneous pathway. Progr. Brain Res.12, 92–118 (1964)Google Scholar
  24. yarowsky, P.J., Carpenter, D.O.: Receptors for Gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA) onAplysia neurons. Brain Res.144, 75–94 (1978)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter J. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology-AnatomyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations