Experience with the Leeds-Keio artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Artificial anterior ligament reconstruction was very popular between 1975 and 1990. Recently, disappointing results have been published. We reviewed 68 patients who had received an artificial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 1 year and 5 years after their operation. The Leeds-Keio device was used as a scaffold. The ligament failed in 32 knees. This was arthroscopically confirmed in 20 cases. The other 12 knees were grossly unstable, with a reappearance of pivot shift, anterior drawer sign and high KT 1000. Generally, we found a marked increase in laxity over the period of investigation. Several biopsies were taken during arthroscopic examination of suspected ruptures. They showed lack of collagenisation and ingrowth.
Key wordsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Leeds-Keio artifical ligament
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Corner EM (1914) Notes of a case illustrative of an anterior crucial ligament, demonstrating the action of that ligament. Proc R Soc Med 7: 120–123Google Scholar
- 3.Dandy DJ, Gray AJR (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Leeds-Keio prosthesis plus extra-articular tenodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76: 193–197Google Scholar
- 5.Fujikawa K (1988) Clinical stuty of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Leeds Keio artificial ligament. In: Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD (eds) Prosthetic ligament reconstruction of the knee. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 132–139Google Scholar
- 6.Fujikawa K (1993) The Leeds-Keio ligament. In: Strover A (ed) The intra-articular reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. Butterworth-Heineman, London, pp 173–207Google Scholar
- 7.Fujikawa K, Nele F, Seedhom B (1989) Arthroscopy after anterior cruciate reconstruction with the Leeds-Keio ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71: 566–570Google Scholar
- 10.Jennings AG, Seedhom BB (1994) Proprioception in the knee and reflex hamstring contraction latency. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76: 491–494Google Scholar
- 12.Macnicol MF, Penny ID, Sheppard L (1991) Early results of the Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligament replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73: 377–380Google Scholar
- 15.Mody BS, Howard L, Harding ML (1993) The ABC carbon and polyester prosthetic ligament for ACL-deficient knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75: 818–821Google Scholar
- 16.Noyes F, Butler DL, Grood EZ (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 344–352Google Scholar
- 18.Seedhom BB (1988) The Leeds-Keio ligament: biomechanics. In: Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD (eds) Prosthetic ligament reconstruction of the knee. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 118–131Google Scholar
- 19.Settlage RA, Johnson DJ, Berman AB (1991) A clinical comparison of two GORE-TEX ligament designs: two year results. Presented at the Combined Congress of the International Arthroscopy Association and the International Society of the Knee. Toronto, Canada, May 13–17Google Scholar