Advertisement

Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 28, Issue 4–5, pp 235–241 | Cite as

Multi-dimensional texts in a one-dimensional medium

  • Claus Huitfeldt
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses one of the tools which may be used for representing texts in machine-readable form, i.e. encoding systems or markup languages. This discussion is at the same time a report on current tendencies in the field. An attempt is made at reconstructing some of the main conceptions of text lying behind these tendencies. It is argued that, although the conceptions of texts and text structures inherent in these tendencies seem to be misguided, text encoding is nevertheless a fruitful approach to the study of texts. Finally, some conclusions are drawn concerning the relevance of this discussion to themes in text linguistics.

Key words

text encoding SGML MECS markup systems text structures Wittgenstein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnard, D., R. Hayter, M. Karababa, G. Logan and J. McFadden. “SGML-Based Markup for Literary Texts: Two Problems and Some Solutions.”Computers and the Humanities, 22, 4 (1988), 265–276.Google Scholar
  2. de Beugrande, Robert and Wolfgang Dressler.Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Coombs, J.H.et al. “Markup Systems and the Future of Scholarly Text Processing.”Communications of the ACM, 30, 11 (1987), 933–947.Google Scholar
  4. Coulmas, Florian.The Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. DeRose, Steveet al. “What is Text, Really?”Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1 (1990), 3–26.Google Scholar
  6. Goldfarb, Charles F. “Introduction to Generalized Markup.” Annex A to ISO 8879–1986. Adapted from “A Generalized Approach to Document Markup,” SIGPLAN Notices, June 1981. The annex does not form an integral part of the International Standard.Google Scholar
  7. Goody, Jack.The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan.Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. Halliday, M.A.K.Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. Huitfeldt, Claus and Viggo Rossvær. “The Norwegian Wittgenstein Project Report 1988.” Report Series no. 44. Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities, Bergen, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Huitfeldt, Claus. “Towards a Machine-Readable Version of Wittgenstein's Nachlaß.” Unpublished working paper (draft), 23, February 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Huitfeldt, Claus. “Das Wittgenstein-Archiv der Universität Bergen. Hintergrund und erster Arbeitsbericht.” InMitteilungen aus der Brenner-Archiv. No. 10. Innsbruck, 1991, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
  13. Huitfeldt, Claus. “MECS — A Multi-Element Code System.” Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 3 (forthcoming, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. Ide, Nancy and Michael Sperberg-McQueen. “Encoding Guidelines Meeting.”ACH Newsletter, 9, 4 (1987), 2, 4, 6.Google Scholar
  15. ISO 8879-1986. “Information Processing — Text and Office Systems Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML).” International Organization for Standardization, ISO 8879-1986.Google Scholar
  16. Kraft, Herbert.Editionsphilologie. Darmstadt: Wissentschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Ong, Walter J. “Writing is a Technology that Restructures Thought.” InThe Written Word. Ed. Gerd Baumann. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. Renear, Allen H., David G. Durand and Elli Mylonas. “Overlapping Hierarchies of Text Objects: Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is.” InConference Abstracts and Programme. ALLC-ACH Conference, Oxford, April 1992, pp. 200–203.Google Scholar
  19. Sinding-Larsen, Henrik. “Information Technology and the Externalization of Knowledge.” InArtificial Intelligence and Language. Ed. Sinding-Larsen. Oslo: Tano, 1988a, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
  20. Sinding-Larsen, Henrik. “Notation and Music: The History of a Tool of Description and its Domain to be Described.” InArtificial Intelligence and Language. Ed. Sinding-Larsen. Oslo: Tano, 1988b, pp. 90–114.Google Scholar
  21. Sperberg-McQueen, Michael. “Text in the Electronic Age: Textual Study and Text Encoding, with Examples from Medieval Texts.”Literary and Linguistic Computing, 6, 1 (1991) 34–46.Google Scholar
  22. TEI EDP1. “Design Principles for Text Encoding Guidelines.” Text Encoding Initiative, document number TEI EDP1, 18.07.89.Google Scholar
  23. TEI P1.Guidelines for the Encoding and Interchange of Machine-Readable Texts. Ed. C.M. Sperberg-McQueen and Lou Burnard. Draft Version 1.1. Chicago and Oxford, November 1990.Google Scholar
  24. Wittgenstein, Ludwig.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul, 1922.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Huitfeldt
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations