Die biologische Spezialisierung bei den Getreiderostpilzen und ihre Bedeutung für die Rostresistenz-Züchtung

Aamodt, O. S.: The inheritance of growth habit and resistance to stem rust in a cross between two varieties of common wheat. J. Agr. Res.24, 457–470 (1923).Google Scholar

Aamodt, O. S.: Breeding wheat for stem rust resistance. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.19, 206–218. 1927.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. L.: Physiologic specialization in Puccinia graminis avenae Erikss. and Henn. Minn. Agr. Ex. Sta. Bul. 35. 1925.Google Scholar

Broadfoot, W. C.: Studies on the parasitism of Fusarium lini Bolley. Phytopath.16, 951–978 (1926).Google Scholar

Carleton, M. A.: Cereal rusts of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Div. Veg. Phys. and Path. Bul 16, 1899.Google Scholar

Christensen, J. J.: Studies on the parasitism of Helminthosporium sativum. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Techn. Bul. 11, 1922.Google Scholar

Christensen, J. J., andE. C. Stakman: Physiologic specialization and mutation in Ustilago zeae. Phytopath.16, 979–999 (1926).Google Scholar

Eriksson, J.: Über die Spezialisierung des Parasitismus bei den Getreiderostpilzen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.12, 292–331 (1894).Google Scholar

Eriksson, J., undE. Henning: Die Hauptresultate einer neuen Untersuchung über die Getreideroste. Z. Pflanzenkrkh.1894, 4.Google Scholar

Eriksson, J., undE. Henning: Die Getreideroste. 1894.Google Scholar

Freeman, E. M., andE. C. Johnson: The rusts of grains in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant. Indus. Bul. 216. 1911.Google Scholar

Gordon, W. L., andD. L. Bailey: Physilogic forms of oat stem rust in Canada. Scientific Agr.9, 30–38 (1928).Google Scholar

Goulden, C. H., K. W. Neatby andJ. N. Welsch: The inheritance of resistance to Puccinia graminis tritici in a cross between two varities of Triticum vulgare Phytopath.18, 631–658 (1928).Google Scholar

Harrington, J. B., andO. S. Aamodt: Mode of inheritance of resistance to Puccinia graminis with relation to seed color in crosses between varieties of durum wheats. J. Agr. Res.24, 979 bis 996 (1923).Google Scholar

Hayes, H. K., andO. S. Aamodt: A Study of rust resistance in a cross between Marquis and Kota wheats. J. Agr. Res.24, 997–1012 (1923).Google Scholar

Hayes, H. K., andE. C. Stakman: Wheat stem rust from the standpoint of plant breeding. Proc. Western Canadian Soc. Agron.2, 22–25 (1922).Google Scholar

Hayes, H. K., E. C. Stakman, andO. S. Aamodt: Inheritance in wheat of resistance to black stem rust. Phytopath.15, 378–387 (1925).Google Scholar

Hitchcock, A. S., andM. A. Carleton: Second report on rusts of grains. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 46, 1894.Google Scholar

Hoerner, G. R.: Biologic forms of Puccinia coronata on oats. Phytopath.9, 309–314 (1919).Google Scholar

Hungerford, C. W., andC. E. Owens: Specialized varieties of Puccinia glumarum and host for variety tritici. J. Agr. Res.25, 336–401 (1923).Google Scholar

Jackson, H. S., andE. B. Mains: Aecial stage of the orange leaf rust of wheat, Puccinia triticina Eriks. J. Agr. Res.22, 151–172 (1921).Google Scholar

Levine, M. N., andE. C. Stakman: Physiologic Spezialization in Puccinia graminis secalis. Phytopath.13, 35 (1923).Google Scholar

Levine, M. N., andE. C. Stakman: A third biologic form of Puccinia graminis on wheat. J. Agr. Res.13, 651–654 (1918).Google Scholar

Mc Fadden, E. S.: Synthetic rust proof bread wheats. Dakota Farmer45, 102 (1925).Google Scholar

Mains, E. B., andH. S. Jackson: Physiologic specialization in the leaf rust of wheat, Puccinia triticina Erikss. Phytopath.16, 89–120 (1926).Google Scholar

Melchers, J. E., andJ. H. Parker: Another strain of Puccinia graminis. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir.68, 1918.Google Scholar

Melhus, I. E., S. M. Dietz, andFlorence Willey: Alternate hosts and biologic specialization of crown rust in America. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 72, 1922.Google Scholar

Newton, Margaret, andJohnson, Thorwaldur: Physiologic forms of wheat stem rust in western Canada. Sci. Agr.7, 4–7 (1927).Google Scholar

Newton, Margaret, Johnson, Th., andA. M. Brown: New physiologic forms of Puccinia graminis tritici. Sci. Agr.9, 209–215 (1928).Google Scholar

Parson, H. E.: Physiologic specialization in Puccinia coronata avenae. Phytopath.17, 783 bis 790 (1927).Google Scholar

Puttick, I. F.: The reaction of theF ₂ generation of a cross between a common and a durum wheat to two biologic forms of Puccinia graminis Phytopath.11, 205–213 (1921).Google Scholar

Rudorf, W.: Beiträge zur Immunitätszüchtung gegen Puccinia glumarum tritici (Streifenrost des Weizens). Phytopathol. Z. Band1, S. 465 (1929).Google Scholar

Scheibe, A.: Studien zum Weizenbraunrost Puccinia triticina Erikss. Arb. biol. Reichsanst. Land- u. Forstw.16, H. 4 (1928).Google Scholar

Schroeter, J.: Entwicklung einiger Rostpilze. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz.3, 69–70 (1879).Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C.: Physiologic Specialisation in plant pathogenic fungi. Leopoldina4, 263–289 (1928).Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C., andM. N. Levine: The determination of biologic forms of Puccinia graminis on triticum spp. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 8, 1922.Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C., andM. N. Levine: Puccinia graminis poae Erikss. u. Henning in the United States. J. Agr. Res.28, 541–548 (1924).Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C., M. N. Levine, andD. L. Bailey: Biologic forms of Puccinia graminis on varieties of Avena spp. J. Agr. Res.24, 1013–1018 (1923).Google Scholar

Stakman, C. E., M. N. Levine, andJ. G. Leach: New biologic forms of Puccinia graminis. J. Agr. Res.16, 103–105 (1919).Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C., andF. J. Piemeisel: A new strain of Puccinia graminis. Phytopath.7, 73 (1917).Google Scholar

Stakman, E. C., andF. J. Piemeisel: Biologic forms of Puccinia graminis on cereals and grasses. J. Agr. Res.10, 429–495 (1917).Google Scholar

Ward, H. M.: Further observations on the brown rust of the Bromes, Puccinia dispersa Erikss, and its adaptive parasitism. Ann. Mycol.1, 132 bis 151 (1903).Google Scholar