Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm

  • 67 Accesses

  • 82 Citations

Abstract

In the interval between screening examinations, some cases of breast cancer are invariably detected clinically in patients whose mammogram was considered to be normal at the earlier screening. During the first interval in the Stockholm study, 60 interval cancers were detected, giving a rate of 1.8 cases/1000 examinations/24 months. About half of these interval cases (31/60) were true interval tumours in that no sign of them could be found on the first mammogram; the other half, non-true, were possible to trace on the first mammogram. It is mainly women under 50 who feature in the interval group, above all in the sub-group of true interval cancers (p<0.05).

The incidence of interval cancer rises, as expected, with the length of the interval (Fig. 1). In the final six months of the 2-year interval the incidence of interval cancers had risen to 88 per cent of the cancers detected in the control group in the same period of time.

The cumulative incidence of interval cancers supports the hypothesis that the distribution of sojourn time in the interval 0–2 years is approximately rectangular. This means that shortening the interval by one-half would halve the number of interval cases.

If mammography becomes a wide spread screening method for early detection of breast cancer, the number of non-true interval cancers could be a feed back on the effectiveness of the screening.

An analysis of the malignancy of the true interval cancers, based on tumour size, axillary status, tumour stage, and estrogen receptor content, shows that these are the more malignant tumours with an unfavourable prognosis, while the control group is intermediate in this respect and the tumours detected at screening have the most favourable prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Andersson I: What can we learn from interval carcinomas? Recent Results Cancer Res 90: 161–163, 1984

  2. 2.

    De Groote R, Rush BF, Milazzo J, Warden MJ, Rocho JM: Interval breast cancer: A more aggressive subset of breast neoplasias. Surgery 94: 543–547, 1983

  3. 3.

    Heuser LS, Spratt JS, Kuhns JG, Chang AFC, Polk HC, Buchanan JB: The association of pathologic and mammographic characteristics of primary human breast cancers with ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ growth rates and with axillary lymph node metastases. Cancer 53: 96–98, 1984

  4. 4.

    Holland R, Mravunac M, Hendrins JHCL, Bekker BV: So-called interval cancers of the breast. Cancer 49: 2527–2533, 1982

  5. 5.

    Martin JE, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR: Breast cancer missed by mammography. Am J Roentgenol 132: 737–739, 1979

  6. 6.

    Buchanan JB, Spratt JS, Heuser LS: Tumor growth, doubling times, and the inability of the radiologist to diagnose certain cancers. Radiol Clin N Amer 21: 115–126, 1983

  7. 7.

    Heuser L, Spratt JS, Polk Jr HO, Buchanan J: Relation between mammary cancer growth kinetics and the intervals between screenings. Cancer 43: 857–862, 1979

  8. 8.

    Frisell J, Glas U, Hellström L, Somell A: Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Design, first round results, and comparisons. Breast Cancer Res Treat 8: 45–54, 1986

  9. 9.

    Lundgren B, Jakobsson S: Single view mammography: a simple and efficient approach to breast cancer screening. Cancer 38: 1124–1129, 1976

  10. 10.

    Gustafsson J-Å, Gustafsson SA, Nordenskjöld B, Okret S, Silfverswärd C, Wrange Ö: Estradiol receptor analysis in human breast cancer tissue by isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel. Cancer Res 38: 4225–4228, 1978

  11. 11.

    Day NE, Walter SD: Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes. Biometrics 40: 1–14, 1984

  12. 12.

    Parl FF, Schmidt BP, Dupont WD, Wagner RK: Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in relation to tumour stage, axillary node metastasis, and histopathologic grading. Cancer 54: 2237–2242, 1984

  13. 13.

    Tabar L, Gad A, Holmberg L, Ljungquist U: Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden. Diagn Imag Clin Med 54: 158–164, 1985

  14. 14.

    Andersson I, Janzon L, Sigfusson BF: Mammographic breast cancer screening — a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden. Maturitas 7: 21–29, 1985

  15. 15.

    Lundgren B: Population screening for breast cancer by single view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden. JNCI 62: 1373–1379, 1979

  16. 16.

    Wallgren A, Silfverswärd C, Eklund G: Prognostic factors in mammary carcinoma. Acta Radiol Therapy Phys Biol 15: 1–16, 1976

  17. 17.

    Langlands AO, Kerr GR: Prognosis in breast cancer: the relevance of clinical staging. Clin Radiol 29: 599–606, 1978

  18. 18.

    von Rosen A, Erhardt K, Hellström L, Somell A, Auer G: Assessment of malignancy potential in so-called interval mammary carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 6: 221–227, 1985

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jan Frisell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frisell, J., Eklund, G., Hellström, L. et al. Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Tr 9, 219–225 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806383

Download citation

Key words

  • breast cancer
  • mammography
  • screening
  • interval cancer
  • prognosis