Roughness and turbulence intensity effects on the induced flow oscillation of a single cylinder
- 43 Downloads
Abstract
The effects of the surface roughness and the turbulence intensity on the dynamic characteristics of the flow induced oscillations of an elastically supported single circular cylinder in a cross flow in the vortex shedding and fluid elastic regions were experimentally investigated. The results of these experiments indicate that, for the vortex shedding region, increasing the surface roughness results in a reduction of the amplitude of oscillation, while in the fluid elastic region, increasing the surface roughness tends to enhance the oscillations. A similar trend for the dynamic response of the cylinder in the vortex shedding region was also observed when the free stream turbulence intensity was varied, while in the fluid elastic region variations in the free stream turbulence intensity were observed to have no drastic effect on the dynamic response of the cylinder.
Keywords
Vortex Surface Roughness Dynamic Response Region Variation Dynamic CharacteristicPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Blevins, R. D.,Flow-Induced Vibration. New York: Van Nostran (1977).Google Scholar
- 2.Parkinson, G., Phenomena and modelling of flow-induced vibrations of bluff bodies.Prog. Aerospace Sci. 26 (1989) 169–244.Google Scholar
- 3.Blake, W. K.,Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press (1986).Google Scholar
- 4.Iwan W. D., The vortex induced oscillations of elastic structural elements.Trans. ASME, J. of Engineering For Industry (1975) 1378–1382.Google Scholar
- 5.Feng, C. C., The measurements of vortex induced effects in flow past stationary and oscillating circular cylinders and D-section cylinders, MSc thesis, University of British Colombia (1968).Google Scholar
- 6.Kwok, K. C. S. and Melbourne, W. H., Cross-wind response of structure due to displacement dependent lock-in excitation. In:Proc. Fifth Int. Con. Wind Engg., Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A., Vol. 2. (1979) pp. 699–708.Google Scholar
- 7.Penzin, J., Wind induced vibration of circular structures.J. Fluid Mechanics, ASCE, paper 1141 (1957) 1–17.Google Scholar
- 8.Durgin, W. W., March, P. A. and Lefbare, P. J., Lower mode response of circular cylinder in cross flow.Trans. ASME, J. Fluids Engg. 102 (1980) 183–190.Google Scholar
- 9.Shiriakashi, M., Ishida, Y. and Wakiya, S., Higher velocity resonance of circular cylinders in cross flow.Trans. ASME, J. Fluids Engg. 107 (1985) 392–396.Google Scholar
- 10.Gowda, B. H. L. and Prabhu, D. R., Interference effects on the flow induced vibration of a circular cylinders.J. of Sound and Vibration 112(3) (1987) 487–502.Google Scholar
- 11.Gerrard, J. H., A disturbance-sensitive Reynolds number range of the flow past a circular cylinder.Fluid Mechanics 22(1) (1969) 187–196.Google Scholar
- 12.Graham, J. M., The effect of end plates on the two dimensionality of a vortex wake.The Aeronautical Quarterly (1969) 237–247.Google Scholar
- 13.Zdravkovich, M. M., Flow-induced vibration of two interference circular cylinders.J. Sound and Vibration 101(4) (1985) 511–521.Google Scholar
- 14.Zdravkovich, M. M., Aerodynamics of two parallel circular cylinders of finite height at simulated high Reynolds number.J. Wind Engg. and Industrial Aerodynamics 6 (1980) 59–71.Google Scholar
- 15.Guven, O., Funel, C. and Patel, V., Surface roughness effects on the near flow past a circular cylinder.J. Fluid Mechanics 125(4) (1980) 673–701.Google Scholar
- 16.Nakamure, Y. and Tomonari, Y., The effects of surface roughness on the flow past circular cylinders, at high Reynolds number.J. Fluid Mechanics 123 (1982) 363–378.Google Scholar
- 17.Nakamure, Y., Ohya Y, and Ozone, S., The effects of turbulence intensity on bluff body near flow.J. Wind Engg. and Ind. Aerodynamics 28 (1988) 251–259.Google Scholar
- 18.Sakamoto, H. and Hanin, H., Effect of free stream turbulence intensity on characteristics of fluctuating forces acting on two square prism in tandem arrangement.Trans. ASME., J. Fluid Engg. 110 (1988) 140–146.Google Scholar