Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 445–457 | Cite as

Did Jefferson or Madison understand Condorcet's theory of social choice?

  • Iain McLean
  • Arnold B. Urken
Article

Conclusion

We therefore conclude that, despite their contacts with Condorcet, neither Jefferson nor Madison understood his exposition of social choice. We have examined all the known primary documents which appear to bear on the question, none of which shows any hint that either Jefferson or Madison understood the social choice components of Condorcet's work. This is so even though Jefferson was a close friend, intellectual soulmate, and collaborator with Condorcet. Madison, though less close to Condorcet's, also knew him and his work. He was less warm than Jefferson to Condorcet's political ideas. In particular, the unicameralism which Condorcet derived from his political theory and advocated in hisNew Haven Letters was anathema to Madison who at the time was writing theFederalist Papers and was using the unicameral Pennsylvania legislature as a dreadful example of the evils of populist democracy. Black's (1958) conclusion that Nanson in 1882 was the first English speaker to understand Condorcet on social choice therefore remains intact, despite hints to the contrary in current literature.

This paper was designed to test the hypothesis that, through a knowledge of social choice, Jefferson and/or Madison was in a position to induce equilibria in the institutions they designed (the parliamentary rules of Congress, and the structure of checks and balances respectively). We find that neither Jefferson nor Madison understood social choice, and thus the hypothesis fails. This is not to belittle their achievement. The Constitution, theFederalist Papers and Jefferson'sManual are all masterpieces. But they are not masterpieces of heresthetics.

Keywords

Current Literature Public Finance Social Choice Close Friend English Speaker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, K.M. (1975).Condorcet: From natural philosophy to social mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, K.M. (Ed.) (1976).Condorcet: Selected writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. (1958).The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borda, J.C. (1784). Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin.Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences année 1781, 657–665.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, J.P. and others (Eds.) (1950–).The papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Condorcet, M.J.A.N., marquis de, and others (1791). Rapport à l'Académie des Sciences sur le choix d'une unité de mesure, le 19 mars 1791.Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences année 1788, 7–16.Google Scholar
  7. Crépel, P. and Gilain, C. (1989).Condorcet: Mathématicien, économiste, philosophe, homme politique. Paris: Minerve.Google Scholar
  8. Dexter, F.B. (Ed.) (1901).The literary diary of Ezra Stiles. New York: Scribners. 3 vols.Google Scholar
  9. Gilreath, J. and Wilson, D.L. (Ed.) (1989).Thomas Jefferson's library: A catalog with the entries in his own order. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  10. Granger, G.-G. (1956).La mathématique sociale du marquis de Condorcet. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  11. Gunter, F.R. (1990, March).Thomas Jefferson on the repudiation of public debt. Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Choice Society in Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  12. Howell, W.S. (Ed.) (1988).Jefferson's parliamentary writings. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, W.T. and others (Eds.) (1962-).The papers of James Madison. Vols. I–X publ. by Chicago University Press, Vols. XI onwards by University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levmore, S. (1989). Parliamentary law, majority decisionmaking, and the voting paradox.Virginia Law Review 75: 971–1044.Google Scholar
  15. McGrath, D. (1983).James Madison and social choice theory: The possibility of republicanism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  16. McKelvey, R.D. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models.Econometrica 47: 1085–1111.Google Scholar
  17. Riker, W.H. (1958). The paradox of voting and Congressional rules for voting on amendments.American Political Science Review 52: 349–366.Google Scholar
  18. Riker, W.H. (1982).Liberalism against populism. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  19. Riker, W.H. (1984). The heresthetics of constitution-making: The Presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice.American Political Science Review 78: 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Riker, W.H. (1986).The art of political manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schelling, T.C. (1960).The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sommerlad, F. and McLean, I.S. (Ed. and Transl.) (1989).The political theory of Condorcet. Oxford University Faculty of Social Studies Working Paper 1/89.Google Scholar
  23. Sommerlad, F. and McLean, I.S. (Ed. and Transl.) (1991).The political theory of Condorcet II. Oxford University Faculty of Social Studies Working Paper 2/91.Google Scholar
  24. Urken, A.B. (1989). Condorcet — Jefferson: un chaînon manquant dans la théorie du choix social. In P. Crépel and C. Gilain (Eds.),Condorcet: Mathématicien, économiste, philosophe, homme politique, 107–118. Paris: Minerve.Google Scholar
  25. Urken, A.B. (1990, March).Condorcet's 1785 Essai and the lost foundations of social choice theory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Choice Society in Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  26. Urken, A.B. (1991). The Condorcet-Jefferson connection and the origins of social choice theory.Public Choice, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  27. Wills, G. (1979).Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. New York: Vintage Books edition.Google Scholar
  28. Young, H.P. (1988). Condorcet's theory of voting.American Political Science Review 82: 1231–1244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iain McLean
    • 1
  • Arnold B. Urken
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of WarwickCoventry
  2. 2.Department of HumanitiesStevens Institute of TechnologyHoboken

Personalised recommendations