Computer Monte Carlo simulation in quantitative resource estimation
- 192 Downloads
The method of making quantitative assessments of mineral resources sufficiently detailed for economic analysis is outlined in three steps. The steps are (1) determination of types of deposits that may be present in an area, (2) estimation of the numbers of deposits of the permissible deposit types, and (3) combination by Monte Carlo simulation of the estimated numbers of deposits with the historical grades and tonnages of these deposits to produce a probability distribution of the quantities of contained metal.
Two examples of the estimation of the number of deposits (step 2) are given. The first example is for mercury deposits in southwestern Alaska and the second is for lode tin deposits in the Seward Peninsula.
The flow of the Monte Carlo simulation program is presented with particular attention to the dependencies between grades and tonnages of deposits and between grades of different metals in the same deposit.
Key wordsMineral assessment Monte Carlo simulation Quantitative assessment Mineral resources
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agterberg, F.P., 1977, Frequency distributions and spatial variability of geological variables,in Ramani, R.V., ed., Application of computer methods in the mineral industry: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Symposium, Oct. 4–8, Society of Mining Engineers of American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, New York, p. 287–298.Google Scholar
- Bliss, J.D., Menzie, W.D., Orris, G.J., and Page, N.J., 1987, Mineral deposit density—A useful tool for mineral-resource assessment,in Sachs, J.S., ed., USGS research on mineral resources—1987: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 995, p. 6.Google Scholar
- Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., 1986, Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, 379 p.Google Scholar
- DeGeoffroy, J.G., and Wu, S.M., 1970, A statistical study of ore occurrence in the greenstone belts of the Canadian shield: Economic Geology, v. 65, p. 496–509.Google Scholar
- Drew, L.J., Bliss, J.D., Bowen, R.W., Bridges, N.J., Cox, D.P., DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Houghton, J.C., Ludington, Stephen, Menzie, W.D., Page, N.J., Root, D.H., and Singer, D.A., 1986, Quantitative estimation of undiscovered mineral resources—A case study of U.S. Forest Service wilderness tracts in the Pacific Mountain system: Economic Geology, v. 81, p. 80–88.Google Scholar
- Eberlein, G.D., and Menzie, W.D., 1978, Maps and tables describing areas of metalliferous mineral resource potential of central Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-1-D, 43 p., 2 sheets, scale 1:1,000,000.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, J.C., 1966, Exploration for natural resources: Operations Research, v. 14, p. 189–209.Google Scholar
- Hudson, Travis, and Arth, J.G., 1983, Tin granites of Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 768–790.Google Scholar
- Knopf, Adolph, 1908, Geology of the Seward Peninsula tin deposits, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 358, p. 67.Google Scholar
- Menzie, W.D., and Jones, G.M., 1986, Grade and tonnage model of W skarn deposits,in Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, p. 55–57.Google Scholar
- Mosier, D.L., Morris, H.T., and Singer, D.A., 1986, Grade and tonnage model of polymetallic replacement deposits,in Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., Mineral deposit-grade tonnage models, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, p. 101–104.Google Scholar
- Reed, B.L., Menzie, W.D., McDermott, M., Root, D.H., Scott, W., and Drew, L.J., 1989, Undiscovered lode tin resources of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Economic Geology, v. 84, no. 7, p. 1936–1947.Google Scholar
- Sainsbury, C.L., 1972, Geologic map of the Teller quadrangle, western Seward Peninsula, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-685, scale 1:250,000.Google Scholar
- Singer, D.A., and Mosier, D.L., 1986, Grade and tonnage model of Cyprus massive sulfide,in Cox, D.P., and Singer, D.A., eds., Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1693, p. 131–135.Google Scholar