Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 163–171

The psychology of self-esteem: Promise or peril?

  • Richard C. Erickson


The psychology of self-esteem bypasses consequential issues of everyday behavior and moral responsibility in favor of pursuing a global goal of enhanced self-esteem on the assumption that happiness, success, and responsible behavior will automatically follow. The goal is vague and ways of achieving it are confused and conflicting. Greater attention to concrete tasks and challenges and sensitivity to moral issues could help make therapy more clear, effective, and socially useful.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Craig W. Ellison (Ed.),Your Better Self: Christianity, Psychology, and Self-Esteem, New York: Harper and Row, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robert H. Schuller,Self-Esteem: The New Reformation, Waco: Word Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruth C. Wylie,The Self Concept, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1961; revised edition, 1974, 1979; “The Present Status of Self Theory” in E.F. Borgatta and W.W. Lambert (Eds.),Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.D. Lynch, A.A. Norem-Hebrison, & K.J. Gergen (Eds.),Self Concept: Advances in Theory and Research, Cambridge: Ballinger, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frank G. Goble,The Third Force, New York: Pocket Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nathaniel Branden,The Psychology of Self-Esteem, New York: Bantam Books, 1969; Wayne Dyer,The Sky's the Limit, New York: Pocket Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robert H. Schuller,Self Love: The Dynamic Force of Success, Old Tappen, NJ: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1969;Self-Esteem: The New Reformation;Tough Times Never Last, But Tough People Do, New York: Bantam Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schuller,Self-Esteem, pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    John G. Cawelti,Apostles of the Self-Made Man, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965; E. Brooks Holifield,A History of Pastoral Care in America: From Salvation to Self-Realization, Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robert Hogan, “Theoretical Egocentrism and the Problem of Compliance,”American Psychologist, 1974,30:533–540; Seymour B. Sarason,Psychology Misdirected, New York: The Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas S. Szasz,The Myth of Mental Illness, New York: Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christopher Lasch,The Culture of Narcissism, New York: W. W. Norton, 1979; Paul C. Vitz,Psychology as Religion: The Cult of Self Worship, Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richard C. Erickson, “The Vulnerable Hero: Theology and the Goals of Therapy,”Journal of Religion and Health, 1973,12:328–336; “Doing What Is Humanly Possible,”Pastoral Psychology, 1985,34:21–29.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richard C. Erickson, “Covenant Making and Pastoral Counseling,”Pastoral Psychology, 1981,30:113–121.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    William Glasser,Reality Therapy, New York: Harper and Row, 1965; O. Hobart Mowrer,The Crisis in Psychiatry and Religion, New York: Van Norstrand, 1961; Szasz,The Myth of Mental Illness; Karl Menninger,Whatever Became of Sin?, New York: Hawthorn Books, 1973; Donald T. Campbell, “On the Conflicts Between Biological and Social Evolution and Between Psychology and Moral Tradition,”American Psychologist, 1975,31:1103–1126; David G. Myers,The Inflated Self, New York: Seabury Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barbara Lerner, “Self-Esteem and Excellence: The Choice and the Paradox,”American Educator, Winter 1985, pp. 10–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Erickson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychology Service (116)Prtland V.A. Medical CenterPortland
  2. 2.Oregon Health Sciences UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations