, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 31–62 | Cite as

Striping patterns in domestic horses

  • J. A. Lusis


  1. 1.

    Striping is distributed among very diverse breeds of domestic horses. It is found more frequently and more dictinctly expressed among primitive, local populations of horses than among standard breeds, due to continued selection against wild coat colors (wilddun, mouse-gray), with which striping is correlated in some way, as yet insufficiently elucidated.

  2. 2.

    Striping in domestic horses in most cases resembles in structure striping in all other species of the familyEquidae (zebras, asses, hemiasses, wild horses) and is by its very nature rudimentary and atavistic (Darwin). The most persistent elements of striping in domestic horses are: the spinal stripe, next horizontal zebroid stripes on the legs, then rudiments of stripes on the vertical system (shoulder stripes and spots); rarely there has been observed the development of arch-shaped stripes on the forehead (Darwin, Ewart, Krieg).

  3. 3.

    A study of variation in such atavistic striping in different breeds of horses throughout the world has made it possible to distinguish two chief types of striping, differing from each other in the structure and localization of the stripes of the vertical system and also in several specific features in the structure of the spinal stripe and the zebroid striping on the legs. The first type of striping (Figs. 1–5) is most clearly expressed in small local breeds of European horses (Ewart'sforest type or thenorthern group of Russian authors), but it is also encountered among horses of thesouthern group (eastern type ofFranck) and heavy western horses. The second type (Figs. 6–16) is characteristic of horses of the Mongolian group and is not found beyond the limits of the latter's influence.

  4. 4.

    In addition to atavistic striping in domestic horses, there occurs in very rare cases, striping of a brindling pattern (Figs. 17a, b), which does not possess the characteristic structural features of striping inEquidae and which — like brindling in cattle (Fig. 18) and dogs — must be regarded as a „new formation” of mutational origin.



Local Population Coat Color Local Breed Continue Selection Striping Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amschler, W., 1931. Farbengenetische Studien am Altaipferde. Züchtungskunde,6: 250–256.Google Scholar
  2. Antonius, O., 1922. Grundzüge einer Stammesgeschichte der Haustiere. Jena.Google Scholar
  3. Antonius, O., 1932. Die Pferde als aussterbende Tiergruppe. Biologia Generalis,8: 33–44.Google Scholar
  4. Antonius, O., 1933. Über einige Quellen zur Frage der europäischen Wildpferde in historischer Zeit. Ztschr. f. Züchtung, Reihe B, Bd. 27.Google Scholar
  5. Bemmelen, J. F. van, 1931. Farbenzeichnung der Säugetiere. Verh. Deutsch Zool. Ges., 54 Jahresversamml., Zool. Anzeiger, Supplementband 5.Google Scholar
  6. Brauner, A. A., 1922. Animal Husbandry. (In Russian). Odessa.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, Ch., 1868 (1st ed.): 1875, 1885 (2nd ed.). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London.Google Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky, Th. G., 1927. Horses of the nomad population of Semirechya Province. (In Russian). Acad. Sci., U.S.S.R. Material of the Special Committee for the Investigation of the Constituent and Autonomous Republics, No. 8, Kazakhstan Series.Google Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky, Th. G. andB. P. Voityatsky, 1920. Horses of the nomad population of Semipalatinsk Province. (In Russian).Loc. cit., Acad. Sci, U.S.S.R. Material of the Special Committee for the Investigation of the Constitutent and Autonomous Republic, No. 18.Google Scholar
  10. Ewart, J. C., 1899. The Penycuik experiments. London.Google Scholar
  11. Ewart, J. C., 1900. Guide to the Zebra Hybrids. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Ewart, J. C. 1904. The multiple origin of horses and ponies. Trans. Highland Agr. Soc. of Scotland, Vol. 16.Google Scholar
  13. Ewart, J. C., 1909–10. The restoration of an ancient British race of horses. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, Vol. 30.Google Scholar
  14. Haecker, V., 1918. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Eigenschaftsanalyse (Phäno-genetik). Jena.Google Scholar
  15. Hilzheimer, M., 1910. Atavismus. Ztschr. ind. Abst.u. Vererbungsl.,3:201–214.Google Scholar
  16. Hilzheimer, M., 1920. Natürliche Rassengeschichte der Haussäugetiere. Berlin.Google Scholar
  17. Hrasnica Fahrudin, 1938. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Streifenzeichnung beim bosnischen Gebirgspferde. Z. Tierz. u. Zb. 41. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  18. Keppen, F. P., 1895. A contribution to the history of the Tarpan in Russian. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
  19. Kholevinsky, A., 1923. A survey of horse breeding in Mongolia. (In Russian). Moscow.Google Scholar
  20. Kohn, F. J., 1909. Über eine Besonderheit der Pferdezeichnung. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. u. Oekol., Bd. 27.Google Scholar
  21. Krieg, R., 1922. Streifung und Strömung. Arch. f. Entwicklungsmechanik, Bd. 51.Google Scholar
  22. Krieg, H., 1922. Die Prinzipien der Streifenzeichnung bei den Säugetieren. Abgeleitet aus Untersuchungen an den Einhufern. Vorträge und Aufsätze über Entwicklungsmechanik, herausgegeben von Wilh. Roux H. 30, Berlin, 101, 5.Google Scholar
  23. Kuleshov, P. N., 1931. Horse Breeding. (In Russian). Moscow.Google Scholar
  24. Lapshakov, J. G., 1930. The Trans-Baikal horse, Its breeding and care. (In Russian). Khabarovsk.Google Scholar
  25. Lyubimov, N., 1927. The Viatkan Horse. (In Russian). Viatka.Google Scholar
  26. Maligonov, A. A., 1927. On the chief types of Siberian horses. (In Russian). The New Village. Moscow.Google Scholar
  27. Pridorogin, M. I., 1902. Horses of Viatka Province. (In Russian). Bull. Moscow Agr. Inst., Vol. 7, No. 1.Google Scholar
  28. Pridorogin, M. I., 1928. Breeds of Horses. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  29. Ridgeway, W., 1905. The origin and influence of the thoroughbred horse.Google Scholar
  30. Rumyantsev, B. F., 1936. On the origin of the domestic horse. (In Russian; Eng. summary). Bull. Acad. Sci., U.S.S.R., Ser. Biol., No. 2–3.Google Scholar
  31. Rumyantsev, B. F. andB. P. Voityatsky, 1936. The horses of Mongolia. (In Russian). Bull. Mongolian Commission, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., No. 22.Google Scholar
  32. Shubskaya, E. I., andF. I. Saltykov, 1931. Yakut cattle. (In Russian). Bull. Council for the Study of Natural Resources, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Yakut Ser., No. 2.Google Scholar
  33. Urusov, S. P., 1899. Russian native breeds of horses (Klepper. Žmudka). (In Russian). Moscow.Google Scholar
  34. Vetulani, T., 1938. Beitrag zur Charakteristik der primitiven Landpferde Polens. Ztschr. Tierz. u. Z.-biologie41:271–304.Google Scholar
  35. Vitt, V. O. 1928. New data on the problem of the inheritance of coat colors in horses. (In Russian). Proc. III All-Union Cong. Zoologists, Anatomists, and Histologists. Leningrad.Google Scholar
  36. Vitt, V. O. (ed.), 1937. Breeds of horses of Central Asia. (In Russian). Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci. Moscow.Google Scholar
  37. Voityatsky, B. P., 1936. Horsebreeding in Daghestan. (Manuscript; in Russian).Google Scholar
  38. Voityatsky, B. P., 1936. Horse Breeding in Karachai. (Manuscript; in Russian).Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, W., 1926. Die Chinesische Landwirtschaft. Berlin.Google Scholar
  40. Warangel, C., 1908–1909. Die Rassen des Pferdes. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  41. Wriedt, Chr., 1933. Biologische Essays über Pferdezucht und Pferderassen. Russian translation (from the 1929 German edition) by V. O. Lipping, under the editorship of and with a foreword by Prof. V. O. Vitt. State Agr. Pub. House, Leningrad-Moscow, 1933.Google Scholar
  42. Zuitin, A. I. andB. P. Voityatsky, 1930. Horses of the nomad population of Kirghizia. Acad. Sci., U.S.S.R. Material of the Commission on Expeditionary Investigations. No. 22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1943

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Lusis
    • 1
  1. 1.LeningradUSSR

Personalised recommendations