Structural optimization

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 99–107 | Cite as

Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design

  • P. Hajela
  • C. -Y. Lin


The present paper describes an implementation of genetic search methods in multicriterion optimal designs of structural systems with a mix of continuous, integer and discrete design variables. Two distinct strategies to simultaneously generate a family of Pareto optimal designs are presented in the paper. These strategies stem from a consideration of the natural analogue, wherein distinct species of life forms share the available resources of an environment for sustenance. The efficacy of these solution strategies are examined in the context of representative structural optimization problems with multiple objective criteria and with varying dimensionality as determined by the number of design variables and constraints.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Deb, K.; Goldberg, D.E. 1989: An investigation of niche and species formation in genetic function optimization, genetic algorithms and their applications.Proc. Third Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms Google Scholar
  2. Goldberg, D.E.; Richardson J. 1987: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization, genetic algorithms and their applications.Proc. Second Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms Google Scholar
  3. Goldberg, D.E. 1989:Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
  4. Hajela, P. 1989: Genetic algorithms in automated structural synthesis. In: Topping, B.H.V. (ed.)Optimization and decision support systems. Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  5. Hajela, P. 1990: Genetic search - an approach to the nonconvex optimization problem.AIAA J. 26, 1205–1210Google Scholar
  6. Hajela, P.; Shih, C.-J. 1989: Optimal design of laminated composites using a modified mixed integer and discrete programming algorithm.Comput. & Struct. 32, 213–221Google Scholar
  7. Hajela, P.; Shih, C.-J. 1990: Multiobjective optimum design in mixed integer and discrete design variable problems.AIAA J. 28, 670–675Google Scholar
  8. Holland, J.H. 1975:Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press Hwang, C.L.; Masud, A.S.M. 1979: Multiple objective decision making: methods and applications; a state-of the art survey.Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 164. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin, C.-Y.; Hajela, P. 1991: Genetic algorithms in structural optimization problems with discrete and integer design variables.J. Engrg. Opt. (to be published)Google Scholar
  10. Pareto, V. 1896:Cours d'economie politique. Lausanne: F. RougeGoogle Scholar
  11. Rechenberg, I. 1965: Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem.Royal Aircraft Establishment, Library Translation 1122 Google Scholar
  12. Schaffer, J.D. 1984:Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Vanderbilt University, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmit, L.A.; Miura, H. 1976: Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis.NASA CR-2552 Google Scholar
  14. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1983: Structural optimization challenges and opportunities.Proc. Int. Conf. Modern Vehicle Design Analysis (held in London)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Hajela
    • 1
  • C. -Y. Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering & MechanicsRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics and Engineering ScienceUniversity of FloridaGainsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations