Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Geologic uncertainty in a regulatory environment: An example from the potential Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository site

  • 35 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

Regulatory geologists are concerned with predicting the performance of sites proposed for waste disposal or for remediation of existing pollution problems. Geologic modeling of these sites requires large-scale expansion of knowledge obtained from very limited sampling. This expansion induces considerable uncertainty into the geologic models of rock properties that are required for modeling the predicted performance of the site.

One method for assessing this uncertainty is through nonparametric geostatistical simulation. Simulation can produce a series of equiprobable models of a rock property of interest. Each model honors measured values at sampled locations, and each can be constructed to emulate both the univariate histogram and the spatial covariance structure of the measured data. Computing a performance model for a number of geologic simulations allows evaluation of the effects of geologic uncertainty. A site may be judged acceptable if the number of failures to meet a particular performance criterion produced by these computations is sufficiently low. A site that produces too many failures may be either unacceptable or simply inadequately described.

The simulation approach to addressing geologic uncertainty is being applied to the potential high-level nuclear waste repository site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, U.S.A. Preliminary geologic models of unsaturated permeability have been created that reproduce observed statistical properties reasonably well. A spread of unsaturated groundwater travel times has been computed that reflects the variability of those geologic models. Regions within the simulated models exhibiting the greatest variability among multiple runs are candidates for obtaining the greatest reduction in uncertainty through additional site characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References Cited

  1. Carr, W. J., 1988, Volcano-tectonic setting of Yucca Mountain and Crater Flat, southwestern Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1790, p. 35–49.

  2. Christakos, G., 1987, Stochastic simulation of spatially correlated geo-processes: Mathematical Geology, v. 19, p. 807–831.

  3. Dagbert, M., 1980, The use of simulated spatially distributed data in geology: Computers & Geosciences, v. 6, p. 175–192.

  4. Deutsch, C., 1989, DECLUS: A Fortran 77 program for determining optimum spatial declustering weights: Computers & Geosciences, v. 15, p. 325–332.

  5. Dudley, A. L., R. R. Peters, J. H. Gauthier, M. L. Wilson, M. S. Tierney, and E. A. Klavetter, 1988, Total System Performance Assessment Code (TOSPAC) Volume 1: Physical and mathematical bases: Sandia Report SAND85-0002, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 204 p.

  6. Freeze, A. R., J. Massmann, L. Smith, T. Sperling, and B. James, 1990, Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework: Ground Water, v. 28, p. 738–766.

  7. Gelhar, L. W., 1986, Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to application: Water Resources Research, v. 22, p. 135S-145S.

  8. Gomez-Hernandez, J. J., and R. M. Srivastava, 1990, ISIM3D: An ANSI-C three dimensional multiple indicator conditional simulation program: Computers & Geosciences, v. 16, p. 395–440.

  9. Harr, M. E., 1987, Reliability-based design in civil engineering: New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 291 p.

  10. Hopkins, P. L., and R. R. Eaton, 1990, LLUVIA: A program for one-dimensional steady-state flow through partially saturated porous media: Sandia Report SAND88-0558, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 44 p.

  11. Journel, A. G., 1974, Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies: Economic Geology, v. 69, p. 673–687.

  12. Journel, A. G., 1983, Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions: Mathematical Geology, v. 15, p. 445–468.

  13. Journel, A. G., 1989, Fundamentals of geostatistics in five lessons: Short course in geology, volume 8: Washington DC, American Geophysical Union, 40 p.

  14. Journel, A. G., and F. Alabert, 1989, Non-gaussian data expansion in the earth sciences: Terra Nova, v. 1, p. 123–134.

  15. Kaplan, P. G., and L. Yarrington, 1989, Modeling the uncertainties in the parameter values of a layered, variably saturated column of volcanic tuff using the beta probability distribution;in Solving ground water problems with models, papers from the NWWA conference on solving ground water problems with models, February 7–9, 1989, Indianapolis, IN: Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers, Indianapolis, IN, p. 111–128.

  16. King, P. R., and P. J. Smith, 1988, Generation of correlated properties in heterogeneous porous media: Mathematical Geology, v. 20, p. 863–877.

  17. Lin, Y. T., and M. S. Tierney, 1986, Preliminary estimates of groundwater travel time and radionuclide transport at the Yucca Mountain repository site: Sandia Report SAND85-2701, S. Sinnock, ed., Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 84 p.

  18. Ortiz, T. S., R. L. Williams, F. B. Nimick, B. C. Whittet, and D. L. South, 1985, A three-dimensional model of reference thermal/mechanical and hydrological stratigraphy at Yucca Mountain, southern Nevada: Sandia Report SAND84-1076, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 76 p.

  19. Prindle, R. W., and P. L. Hopkins, 1990, On conditions and parameters important to model sensitivity for unsaturated flow through layered, fractured tuff: Results of analyses for HYDROCOIN, level 3, case 2: Sandia Report SAND89-0652, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 252 pp.

  20. SNL (Sandia National Laboratories), 1987, Site characterization plan conceptual design report: Sandia Report SAND84-2641, compiled by H. R. MacDougall, L. W. Scully, and J. R. Tillerson, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.

  21. Swadley, W. C., D. L. Hoover, and J. N. Rosholt, 1984. Preliminary report on late Cenozoic faulting and stratigraphy in the vicinity of Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report USGS OFR-84-788, 42 p.

  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990, Environmental radiation protection standards for management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 191.

  23. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1990, Disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in geologic repositories, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 60.

  24. van Genuchten, R., 1978, Calculating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with a new closed form analytical model: Water Resources Bulletin 78-WR-08 Princeton University Press, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rautman, C.A., Treadway, A.H. Geologic uncertainty in a regulatory environment: An example from the potential Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository site. Environ. Geol. Water Sci 18, 171–184 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01740473

Download citation

Keywords

  • Waste Disposal
  • Geologic Model
  • Rock Property
  • Site Characterization
  • Geostatistical Simulation