Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 267–317

Evolution of the differential regulation of duplicate genes after polyploidization

  • Stephen D. Ferris
  • Gregory S. Whitt
Article

Summary

In the 50 million years since the polyploidization event that gave rise to the catostomid family of fishes the duplicate genes encoding isozymes have undergone different fates. Ample opportunity has been available for regulatory evolution of these duplicate genes. Approximately half the duplicate genes have lost their expressions during this time. Of the duplicate genes remaining, the majority have diverged to different extents in their expression within and among adult tissues. The pattern of divergence of duplicate gene expression is consistent with the accumulation of mutations at regulatory genes. The absence of a correlation of extent of divergence of gene expression with the level of genetic variability for isozymes at these loci is consistent with the view that the rates of regulatory gene and structural gene evolution are uncoupled. The magnitude of divergence of duplicate gene expressions varies among tissues, enzymes, and species. Little correlation was found with the extent of divergence of duplicate gene expression within a species and its degree of morphological “conservatism”, although species pairs which are increasingly taxonomically distant are less likely to share specific patterns of differential gene expression. Probable phylogenetic times of origin of several patterns of differential gene expression have been proposed. Some patterns of differential gene expression have evolved in recent evolutionary times and are specific to one or a few species, whereas at least one pattern of differential gene expression is present in nearly all species and probably arose soon after the polyploidization event. Multilocus isozymes, formed by polyploidization, provide a useful model system for studying the forces responsible for the maintenance of duplicate genes and the evolution of these once identical genes to new spatially and temporally specific patterns of regulation.

Key words

Isozymes Gene duplication and regulation Molecular and regulatory evolution Polyploidy Fish Teleosts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allendorf, F.W., Utter, F.M., May, B.P. (1975). Gene duplication within the family Salmonidae: II. Detection and determination of the genetic control of duplicate loci through inheritance studies and the examination of populations. In: Isozymes IV. Genetics and Evolution, C.L. Markert, ed., pp. 415–432, New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, P.B., Child, J.S. (1965). Stages in the normal development ofFundulus heteroclitus. Biol. Bull.128, 143–168Google Scholar
  3. Avise, J.C., Kitto, B.G. (1973). Phosphoglucose isomerase gene duplication in the bony fishes, an evolutionary history. Biochem. Genet.8, 113–132Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, G.S., Poulter, R.T.M., Stockwell, P.A. (1978). Gene duplication in tetraploid fish: a model for silencing at unlinked duplicated loci. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.75, 5575–5579Google Scholar
  5. Britten, R.J., Davidson, E.H. (1969). Gene regulation for higher cells: A theory. Science165, 349–357Google Scholar
  6. Britten, R.J., Davidson, E.H. (1971). Repetitive and non-repetitive DNA sequences and a speculation on the origins of evolutionary novelty. Quart. Rev. of Biol.46, 111–138Google Scholar
  7. Bullough, W.S. (1965). Mitotic and functional homeostasis. Cancer Res.25, 1683–1727Google Scholar
  8. Cherry, L.M., Case, S.M., Wilson, A.C. (1978). Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees. Science200, 209–211Google Scholar
  9. Dayhoff, M. (1972). Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Volume 5. Washington, D.C.: National Biomedical Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
  10. Dice, J.F., Goldberg, A.L. (1975). Relationship between in vivo degradative rates and isoelectric points of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.72, 3893–3897Google Scholar
  11. Don, M., Masters, C.J. (1976). On the comparative turnover rates of the lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in rat tissues. Eur. J. Biochem.7, 215–220Google Scholar
  12. Engel, W., Schmidtke, J., Vogel, W., Wolf, U. (1973). Genetic polymorphism of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in the carp (Cyprinus carpio) apparently due to a “null allele.” Biochem. Genet.8, 281–289Google Scholar
  13. Engle, W., Schmidtke, J., Wolf, U. (1975). Diploid-tetraploid relationships in teleostean fishes. In: Isozymes IV. Genetics and Evolution, C.L. Markert, ed., pp. 449–476. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Eppenberger, H.M., Scholl, A., Ursprung, H. (1971). Tissue specific isoenzyme patterns of creatine kinase (2.7.3.2) in trout. FEBS Letters14, 317–319Google Scholar
  15. Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1977a). Loss of duplicate gene expression after polyploidization. Nature265, 258–260Google Scholar
  16. Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1977b). Duplicate gene expression in diploid and tetraploid loaches (Cypriniformes, Cobitidae). Biochem. Genet.15, 1097–1111Google Scholar
  17. Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1977c). The evolution of duplicate gene expression in the carp (Cyprinus carpio). Experientia33, 1299–1301Google Scholar
  18. Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1978a). Phylogeny of tetraploid catostomid fishes based on the loss of duplicate gene expression. Syst. Zool.27, 189–206Google Scholar
  19. Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1978b). Genetic and molecular analysis of nonrandom dimer assembly of creatine kinase isozymes of fishes. Biochem. Genet.16, 811–830Google Scholar
  20. Ferris, S.D., Portnoy, S., Whitt, G.S. (1979). The roles of speciation and divergence time in the loss of duplicate gene expression. Theoret. Pop. Biol. (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, S.E., Whitt, G.S. (1978). Evolution of isozyme loci and their differential tissue expression: Creatine kinase as a model system. J. Mol. Evol.12, 25–55Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, S.E., Shaklee, J.B., Ferris, S.D., Whitt, G.S. (1979). Evolution of five multilocus isozyme systems in the chordates. In: Animal Genetics and Evolution (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Flickinger, R. (1975). Relation of an evolutionary mechanism to differentiation. Differentiation3, 155–159Google Scholar
  24. Garcia-Olmedo, F., Carbonero, P., Aragoncillo, C., Salcedo, G. (1978). Loss of redundant gene expression after polyploidization in plants. Experientia34, 332–333Google Scholar
  25. Gilbert, B.E., Johnson, T.C. (1972). Protein turnover during maturation of mouse brain tissue. J. Cell. Biol.53, 143–147Google Scholar
  26. Goldberg, E. (1977). Isozymes in testes and spermatozoa. In: Isozymes, Current Topics in Biological and Medical Research, M. Rattazzi, J.G. Scandalios, G.S. Whitt, eds.,1, 80–125. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Goodman, M., Moore, G.W., Matsuda, G. (1975). Evolution of vertebrate hemoglobin amino acid sequences. In: Isozymes IV. Genetics and Evolution, C.L. Markert, ed., pp. 181–206. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Gottlieb, L.D. (1976). Biochemical consequences of speciation in plants. In: Molecular Evolution, F.J. Ayala, ed., pp. 123–140. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Gottlieb, L.D. (1977). Evidence for duplication and divergence of the structural gene for phosphogluco-isomerase in diploid species ofClarkia. Genetics86, 289–307Google Scholar
  30. Hart, G.E., Langston, P.J. (1977). Chromosomal location and evolution of isozyme structural genes in hexaploid wheat. Heredity39, 263–277Google Scholar
  31. Holmes, R.S., Markert, C.L. (1969). Immunochemical homologies among subunits of trout lactate dehydrogenase isozymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.64, 205–210Google Scholar
  32. Hopkinson, D.A., Edwards, Y.H., Harris, H. (1976). The distributions of subunit numbers and subunit sizes of enzymes: a study of the products of 100 human gene loci. Ann. Hum. Genet., Lond.39, 383–411Google Scholar
  33. Ingram, V.M. (1961). Gene evolution and the haemoglubins. Nature189, 704–708Google Scholar
  34. Jones, G.L., Masters, C.J. (1974). On the synthesis and degradation of the multiple forms of catalase in mouse liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.161, 601–609Google Scholar
  35. King, M., Wilson, A.C. (1975). Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science188, 107–116Google Scholar
  36. Klebe, R.J. (1975). A simple method for the quantitation of isozyme patterns. Biochem. Genet.13, 805–812Google Scholar
  37. Lim, S.T., Kay, R.M., Bailey, G.S. (1975). Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in salmonid fish. Evidence for unique and rapid functional divergence of duplicated H4 lactate dehydrogenases. J. Biol. Chem.250, 1790–1800Google Scholar
  38. Lim, S.T., Bailey, G.S. (1977). Gene duplication in salmonid fishes: Evidence for duplicated but catalytically equivalent A4 lactate dehydrogenases. Biochem. Genet.15, 707–721Google Scholar
  39. Lebherz, H.G. (1975). Evidence for lack of subunit exchange between aldolase tetramers in vivo. J. Biol. Chem.250, 7388–7391Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, N., Gibson, J. (1978). Variation in amount of enzyme protein in natural populations. Biochem. Genet.16, 159–170Google Scholar
  41. Long, W.L., Ballard, W.W. (1976). Normal embryonic stages of the white sucker,Catostomus commersoni. Copeia 1976, 342–351Google Scholar
  42. Majerus, P.W., Kilburn, E. (1969). Acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. The roles of synthesis and degradation in regulation of enzyme levels in rat liver. J. Biol. Chem.244, 6254–6262Google Scholar
  43. Markert, C.L., Masui, Y. (1969). Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes of the penguinPygoscelis adeliae. J. Exp. Zool.172, 121–146Google Scholar
  44. Markert, C.L., Ursprung, H. (1971). Developmental Genetics. New Jersey: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  45. Markert. C.L., Shaklee, J.B., Whitt, G.S. (1975). Evolution of a gene. Science189, 102–114Google Scholar
  46. Nadal-Ginard, B. (1978). Regulation of lactate dehydrogenase levels in the mouse. J. Biol. Chem.253, 170–177Google Scholar
  47. Ohno, S. (1970). Evolution by Gene Duplication. New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  48. Perutz, M.F., Kendrew, J.C., Watson, H.C. (1965). Structure and function of haemoglobin. II. Some relations between polypeptide chain configuration and amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol.13, 669–678Google Scholar
  49. Pesce, A., Fondy, T.P. Stolzenbach, F., Castillo, F., Kaplan, N.O. (1967). The comparative enzymology of lactic dehydrogenases. J. Biol. Chem.242, 2151–2167Google Scholar
  50. Petit, C., Zuckerkandl, E. (1976). Evolution Genetique des Populations, Evolution Moleculaire. Paris: Herman PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Scandalios, J.G. (1975). Differential gene expression and biochemical properties of catalase isozymes in maize. In: Isozymes III: Developmental Biology, C.L. Markert, ed., pp. 213–238. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaklee, J.B., Kepes, K.L., Whitt, G.S. (1973). Specialized lactate dehydrogenase isozymes: The molecular and genetic basis for the unique eye and liver LDHs of teleost fishes. J. Exp. Zool.185, 217–240Google Scholar
  53. Shaklee, J.B., Champion, M.J., Whitt, G.S. (1974). Developmental genetics of teleosts: A biochemical analysis of lake chubsucker ontogeny. Devel. Biol.38, 356–382Google Scholar
  54. Shaklee, J.B. (1975). The role of subunit interactions in the genesis of non-binomial lactate dehydrogenase isozyme distributions. In: Isozymes I: Molecular Structure, C.L. Markert, ed., pp. 101–118. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw, C.R., Prasad, R. (1970). Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes—A compilation of recipes. Biochem. Genet.4, 297–320Google Scholar
  56. Shows, T.B., Massaro, E.J., Ruddle, F.H. (1969). Evolutionary evidence for a regulator gene controlling the lactate dehydrogenase B gene in rodent erythrocytes. Biochem. Genet.3, 525–536Google Scholar
  57. Shultze, B., Oehlert, W. (1960). Autoradiographic investigation of incorporation of3H-thymidine into cells of rat and mouse. Science131, 737–738Google Scholar
  58. Sparrow, A.H., Nauman, A.F. (1976). Evolution of genome size by DNA doublings. Science192, 524–529Google Scholar
  59. Uyeno, T., Smith, G.R. (1972). Tetraploid origin of the karyotype of catostomid fishes. Science175, 644–646Google Scholar
  60. Wallace, B., Kass, T.L. (1974). On the structure of gene control regions. Genetics77, 541–558Google Scholar
  61. Watts, D.C. (1975). Evolution of phosphagen kinases in the chordate line. Symp. Zool. Soc., London36, 105–127Google Scholar
  62. Whitt, G.S., Miller, E.T., Shaklee, J.B. (1973). Developmental and biochemical genetics of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in fishes. In: Genetics and Mutagenesis of Fish, J.H. Schroder, ed., pp. 243–276. New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitt, G.S., Childers, W.F., Shaklee, J.B., Matsumoto, J. (1976). Linkage analysis of the multilocus glucosephosphate isomerase isozyme system in sunfish (Centrarchidae, Teleostii). Genetics82, 35–42Google Scholar
  64. Whitt, G.S., Philipp, D.P., Childers, W.F. (1977). Aberrant gene expression during development of hybrid sunfishes (Perciformes, Teleostei). Differentiation9, 97–109Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, A.C., Sarich, V.M., Maxson, L.R., (1974). The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.71, 3028–3030Google Scholar
  66. Zuckerkandl, E. (1965). The evolution of hemoglobin. Sci. Amer.212, 110–118Google Scholar
  67. Zuckerkandl, E. (1968). Hemoglobins, Haeckel's “Biogenetic Law.” and Molecular Aspects of Development, In: Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology. A. Rich, N. Davidson, eds., pp. 256–274. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
  68. Zuckerkandl, E. (1978). Multilocus enzymes, gene regulation, and genetic sufficiency. J. Mol. Evol.12, 57–89Google Scholar
  69. Zuckerkandl, E., Pauling, L. (1965). In: Evolving Genes and Proteins. V. Bryson, H.J. Vogel, eds., p. 97. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen D. Ferris
    • 1
  • Gregory S. Whitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and DevelopmentUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations