Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 111–120 | Cite as

A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences

  • Motoo Kimura


Some simple formulae were obtained which enable us to estimate evolutionary distances in terms of the number of nucleotide substitutions (and, also, the evolutionary rates when the divergence times are known). In comparing a pair of nucleotide sequences, we distinguish two types of differences; if homologous sites are occupied by different nucleotide bases but both are purines or both pyrimidines, the difference is called type I (or “transition” type), while, if one of the two is a purine and the other is a pyrimidine, the difference is called type II (or “transversion” type). Letting P and Q be respectively the fractions of nucleotide sites showing type I and type II differences between two sequences compared, then the evolutionary distance per site is K = — (1/2) ln {(1 — 2P — Q) }. The evolutionary rate per year is then given by k = K/(2T), where T is the time since the divergence of the two sequences. If only the third codon positions are compared, the synonymous component of the evolutionary base substitutions per site is estimated by K'S = — (1/2) ln (1 — 2P — Q). Also, formulae for standard errors were obtained. Some examples were worked out using reported globin sequences to show that synonymous substitutions occur at much higher rates than amino acid-altering substitutions in evolution.

Key words

Molecular evolution Evolutionary distance estimation Synonymous substitution rate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Efstratiadis A, Kafatos FC (1977) Cell 10:571–585Google Scholar
  2. Heindell HC, Liu A, Paddock GV, Studnicka GM, Salser WA (1978) Cell 15:43–54Google Scholar
  3. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed), Mammalian protein metabolism, II. New York, Academic Press, p 21Google Scholar
  4. Kimura M (1968) Nature 217:624–626Google Scholar
  5. Kimura M (1977) Nature 267:275–276Google Scholar
  6. Kimura M (1979) Sci Am 241 (No.5, Nov.):94–104Google Scholar
  7. Kimura M, Ohta T (1972) J Mol Evol 2:87–90Google Scholar
  8. Kimura M, Ohta T (1974) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2848–2852Google Scholar
  9. King JL, Jukes TH (1969) Science 164:788–798Google Scholar
  10. Konkel DA, Tilghman SM, Leder P (1978) Cell 15:1125–1132Google Scholar
  11. Marotta CA, Wilson JT, Forget BG, Weissman SM (1977) J Biol Chem 252:5040–5053Google Scholar
  12. Miyata T, Miyazawa S, Yasunaga T (1979) J Mol Evol 12:219–236Google Scholar
  13. Miyata T, Yasunaga T (1980) J Mol Evol 16:23–36Google Scholar
  14. Nishioka Y, Leder A, Leder P (1980) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2806–2809Google Scholar
  15. Richards RI, Shine J, Ullrich A, Wells JRE, Goodman HM (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 7:1137–1146Google Scholar
  16. Romer AS (1968) The procession of life. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  17. Vanin EF, Goldberg GI, Tucker PW, Smithies O (1980). Nature 286:222–226Google Scholar
  18. van Ooyen A, van den Berg J, Mantel N, Weissmann C (1979) Science 206:337–344Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Motoo Kimura
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of GeneticsMishimaJapan

Personalised recommendations