, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 47–69 | Cite as

On the fission of troops of Japanese monkeys

II. General View of Troop Fission of Japanese Monkeys
  • Yoshio Furuya


The troop fission of Japanese monkeys has been observed in 11 troops, and the total number of fissions observed numbered 22. Examined cases of fission relative to season, amount of food, troop size and socionomic sex ratio of the main troop and to individuals that acted as nucleus in forming a branch troop and females, exhibited variance, not being uniform. But inquiry into troop fission as seen from the standpoint of the mechanism maintained by Japanese monkeys' society indicated (1) troop fission checks the growth of troop size and increases the socionomic sex ratio of the main troop, (2) troop fission is an effective mechanism for the maintenance of class structure among adult males, and (3) the possibility that troop fission functions to check inbreeding.

Thus, it must be said in general that troop fission, along with single desertions of males, plays a very important role as one mechanism for the maintenance of the society of Japanese monkey. However, the branch troop is often composed of a large number of males and a small number of females; in short, it is under very difficult conditions that a branch troop starts on its way to becoming a fully established Japanese monkey troop.

The troop fission is an effective mechanism for the maintenance of the main troop, but not too effective for that of the branch troop.

It cannot be said that there are abundant data on troop fission of primates other than Japanese monkey. But, from limited data, we can find various forms of troop fission according to each species, and it may be ultimately related to the maintenance mechanism of the primate society.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, S. A., 1959. Field observations on a howling monkey society.J. Mammal., 40: 317–330.Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, C. R., 1934. A field study of the behavior and social relations of howling monkeys.Comp. Psychol. Monograph, 10(48): 1–168.Google Scholar
  3. ——, 1953. Grouping behavior of howling monkeys.Extrate des Archieves Neerlandaises de Zoologie, X(2): 45–50.Google Scholar
  4. ——, 1962. Field studies of a primate population. In:Roots of Behavior,E. L. Bliss, (ed.) New York: Harper & Row: 286–294.Google Scholar
  5. --, 1965. The howlers of Barro Colorado Island. In:Primate Behavior,I. DeVore (ed.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 250–291.Google Scholar
  6. Collias, N. &C. Southwick, 1952. A field study of population density and social organization in howling monkeys.Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 96: 143–156.Google Scholar
  7. DeVore, I. & S. L. Washburn, 1963. Baboon ecology and human evolution. In:African Ecology and Human Evolution,F. C. Howell & F. Bourlière (eds.) VFPA, 36, New York: 335–367.Google Scholar
  8. -- &K. R. L. Hall, 1965. Baboon ecology. In:Primate Behavior,I. DeVore (ed.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 20–52.Google Scholar
  9. Furuya, Y., 1960. An example of fission of a natural troop of Japanese monkeys at Gagyusan.Primates 2(2): 149–179.Google Scholar
  10. ——, 1965. Social organization of the crab-eating monkey.Primates 6(3–4): 285–336.Google Scholar
  11. ——, 1966. On the malformation occurred in the Gagyusan troop of wild Japanese monkeys.Primates 7(4): 488–492.Google Scholar
  12. ——, 1968. On the fission of troops of Japanese monkeys, I.Primates 9 (4): 323–350.Google Scholar
  13. Goodall, J., 1965. Chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream Reserve. In:Primate Behavior,I. DeVore (ed.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 425–473.Google Scholar
  14. Hida, Y., 1964.Yohei's Diary. Jitsugyono-nippon-sha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  15. Itani, J., 1954. Takasakiyama no saru (Japanese monkeys in Takasakiyama). In:Nihon Dobutsuki II,K. Imanishi (ed.): 284pp. Kobunsha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  16. ——, 1963. The social construction of natural troops of Japanese monkeys in Takasakiyama.Primates, 4(3): 1–42.Google Scholar
  17. ——, 1967. The social unit of chimpanzees.Primates, 8(4): 355–381.Google Scholar
  18. Kano, K., 1964. On the second division of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys in Takasakiyama. In:Wild Japanese Monkeys in Takasakiyama,J. Itani,J. Ikeda, &T. Tanaka (eds.): 42–73, Keisoshobo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  19. Kawai, M., 1961. On the change of leader male in Japanese monkey's troop.Yaen, 9.Google Scholar
  20. Koford, C. B., 1963. Group relations in an island colony of rhesus monkeys. In:Primate Social Behavior,C. H. Southwick (ed.), Princeton, N. J.: D. Van Nostrand Company: 136–152.Google Scholar
  21. Kortlandt, A., 1962. Chimpanzees in the wild.Sc. Am., 20: 349–367.Google Scholar
  22. Nishida, T., 1966. A sociological study of solitary male monkeys.Primates, 7(2): 141–204.Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds, V. & F. Reynolds, 1965. Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest. In:Primate Behavior,I. DeVore (ed.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 368–424.Google Scholar
  24. Southwick, C. H., M. A. Beg, & M. R. Siddiqi, 1965. Rhesus monkeys in North India. In:Primate Behavior, I. DeVore (ed.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 111–159.Google Scholar
  25. Sugiyama, Y., 1960. On the division of a natural troop of Japanese monkeys at Takasakiyama.Primates, 2(2): 109–148.Google Scholar
  26. ——, 1964. Group composition, population density, and some sociological observation of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 5(3–4): 7–37.Google Scholar
  27. ——, 1965. Behavioral development and social structure in two troops of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 6(2): 213–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshio Furuya
    • 1
  1. 1.Shizuoka Women's CollegeYada, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations