Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 177–183 | Cite as

Central venous catheter infections: Concepts and controversies

  • C. R. Reed
  • C. N. Sessler
  • F. L. Glauser
  • B. A. Phelan
Review Article


Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in critically ill patients in intensive care units. However, infectious complications are common and may limit their utility. We critically review the literature to determine the impact of CVC design amd composition, insertion site selection, insertion procedures, care and removal of temporary CVCs on infectious complications. Relevant articles were identified and selected for review using a database search (Medline and manual of the English language literature) based upon study design and sample size with an emphasis on prospective randomized trials. To minimize infectious complications and maintain a reasonable cost-benefit ratio, we recommend: i) use a single lumen catheter unless clear indications for a multi-lumen catheter exist; ii) insert the catheter via the subclavian vein if no relative contraindication exists (bleeding diathesis, positive pressure ventilation); iii) disinfect the insertion site employing sterile technique; iv) apply a dry, sterile dressing and change the dressing every other day; v) inspect the insertion site for signs of infection and remove the catheter if pus is present; vi) if a catheter-related infection is suspected, change the catheter over a guidewire and culture the distal segment. The replacement catheter should be removed if an original catheter segment culture is positive.

Key words

Central venous catheterization Infection Septicemia Intensive care Literature review 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hampton AA, Sheretz RJ (1988) Vascular access infections in hospitalized patients. Surg Clin North Am 68: 57–71Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maki DG, Band JD (1981) A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. Am J Med 70:739–744Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP et al (1992) American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20: 864–874Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for indentifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296: 1305–1309Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleri DJ, Corrado ML, Seligman SJ (1980) Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis 141:781–786Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly CS, Ligas JR, Smith CA, Madden GM et al (1986) Sepsis due to triple lumen central venous catheters. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163:14–16Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stillman R, Soliman F, Garcia L, Sawyer P (1977) Etiology of catheter-associated sepsis: correlation with thrombogenicity. Arch Surg 112:1497–1499Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoshal VL Jr, Ause RG, Hoskins PA (1971) Fibrin sleeve formation on indwelling subclavian central venous catheters. Arch Surg 102:353–358Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fabri PJ, Mortallo JM, Ebbert ML, Kudsk KA et al (1984) Clinical effect of nonthrombotic total parenteral nutrition catheters. JPEN 8:705–707Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kudsk KA, Powell C, Mirtallo JM, Fabri PJ et al (1985) Heparin does not reduce catheter sepsis during total parenteral nutrition. JPEN 9:348–349Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey MJ (1979) Reduction of catheter-associated sepsis in parenteral nutrition using low-dose intravenous heparin. BMJ 23:1671–1673Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamal GD, Pfaller MA, Rempe LE, Jebson PJ (1991) Reduced intravascular catheter infection by antibiotic bonding: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 265:2364–2368Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maki DG, Wheeler SJ, Stolz SM, Mermel LA (1991) Clinical trial of a novel antiseptic central venous catheter. The 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, September 29-October 2:176 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pemberton LB, Lyman B, Lander V, Covinsky J (1989) Sepsis from triple- vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients. Arch Surg 121: 591–594Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilton E, Haslett T, Borenstein MT, Isenberg JD et al (1988) Central catheter infections: single- versus triple-lumen catheters; influence of guide wires on infection rates when used for replacement of catheters. Am J Med 84:667–672Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCarthy MC, Shives JK, Robison RJ, Broadie RA (1987) Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition. JPEN 11:259–262Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller JJ, Venus B, Mathru M (1984) Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single lumen, triple lumen, and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care Med 12:634–637Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernard RW, Stahl WM, Chase RM (1971) Subclavian vein catheterizations: a prospective study; II. Infectious complications. Ann Surg 173:191–200Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farkas JC, Liu N, Bleriot JP, Chevret S et al (1992) Single- versus triple-lumen central catheter-related sepsis: a prospective randomized study in a critically ill population. Am J Med 93: 277–282Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pomp A, Stella L, Caldwell D, Albina J (1988) Catheter-related sepsis: single lumen catheters (SLC) vs triple lumen catheters (TLC) JPEN 12:23s (Abstract)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee RB, Buckner R, Sharp KW (1988) Do multi-lumen catheters increase central venous catheter sepsis compared to single-lumen catheters? J Trauma 28: 1472–1475Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Applefeld JJ, Caruthers TE, Reno DS Civetta JM (1978) Assessment of the sterility of long term cardiac catheterization using the thermodilution Swan-Ganz catheter. Chest 74:377–380Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaye W, Wheaton M, Potter-Bynoe G (1983) Radial and pulmonary artery catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med 11:249–252Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hudson-Civetta JA, Civetta JM, Martinez OV, Hoffman TA (1987) Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter-related infection in septic surgical patients. Crit Care Med 15:29–34Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnston WE, Prough DS, Royster RL, Peacock JE et al (1984) Short-term sterility of the pulmonary artery catheter inserted through an external plastic shield. Anesth 61:461–464Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bach A, Bohrer H, Geiss HK (1992) Safety of a guidewire technique for replacement of pulmonary artery catheters. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 6: 711–714Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaiser CW, Koornick AR, Smith N, Soroff HS (1981) Choice of route for central venous cannulation: subclavian or internal jugular vein? A prospective randomized study. J Surg Oncol 17: 345–354Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Senagore A, Waller JD, Bonnell BW, Bursch LR et al (1987) Pulmonary artery catheterization: a prospective study of internal jugular and subclavian approaches. Crit Care Med 15:35–37Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burr C, Ainefeld EW (1978) The caval catheter. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–65Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sessler CN, Glauser FL (1987) Central venous cannulation done by house officers in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. South Med J 80: 1239–1248Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gil RR, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW (1989) Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. Arch Intern Med 149:1139–1143Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Collignon P, Soni N, Pearson I, Sorrell T et al (1988) Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 14:227–231Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y et al (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis; critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pinilla JC, Ross DF, Martin T, Crump H (1983) Study of the incidence of intravascular catheter infection and associated septicemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 11:21–25Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bjornson HS, Colley R, Bower RH, Duty VP et al (1982) Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery 92:720–727Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snydman DR, Pober BR, Murray SA, Gorbea HF et al (1982) Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection. Lancet II:1385–1388Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ (1991) Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 338:339–343Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bozzetti F, Terno G, Bonfanti G, Scarpa D et al (1983) Prevention and treatment of central venous catheter sepsis by exchange via a guidewire. Ann Surg 198:48–52Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sitzmann JV, Townsend TR, Siler MC, Bartlett JG (1984) Septic and technical complications of central venous catheterization: a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 202: 766–770Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Powell CR, Traetow MJ, Fabri PJ, Kudsk KA et al (1985) Op-site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day op-site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. JPEN 9:443–446Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maki DG, McCormack KN (1987) Defatting catheter insertion sites in total parenteral nutrition is of no value as an infection control measure. Am J Med 83:833–840Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Essop AR, Frolich J, Moosa MR, Miller M et al (1984) Risk factors related to bacterial contamination of indwelling vascular catheters in non-infected hosts. Intensive Care Med 10: 193–195Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Prager RL, Silva J Jr (1984) Colonization of central venous catheters. South Med J 77:458–461Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG, Miller KB, Newsome HH Jr et al (1986) Prospective study of catheter replacement and other risk factors for infection of hyperalimentation catheters. J Infect Dis 154:808–816Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conly JM, Grieves K, Peters B (1989) A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis 159:310–319Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maki DG, Cobb L, Garman JK, Shapiro JM et al (1988) An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Am J Med 85:307–314Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Flowers RHIII, Schwenzer KJ, Kopel RF, Fisch MJ et al (1989) Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. JAMA 261:878–883Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Welch GW, McKeel DW, Silverstein P, Walker HL (1974) The role of catheter composition in the development of thrombophlebitis. Ann Intern Med 138: 421–424Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Powell C, Regan C, Farri PJ, Ruberg RL (1982) Evaluation of opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. JPEN 6:43–46Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ricard P, Martin R, Marcoux JA (1985) Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med 13:541–543Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    McCredie KB, Lawson M, Marts K, Stern J (1984) A comparative evaluation of transparent dressings and gauze dressings for central venous catheters. JPEN 8:96Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA (1992) Transparent polyurethane-film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection rates. JAMA 267:2072–2076Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hill RL, Fisher AP, Ware RJ, Wilson S et al (1990) Mupirocin for the reduction of colonization of internal jugular cannulae-a randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Infect 15:311–321Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Samsoondar W, Freeman JB (1985) Colonization of intravascular monitoring devices. Crit Care Med 13:753–755Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moyer MA, Edwards LD, Farley L (1983) Comparative culture methods on 100 intravenous catheters: routine, semiquantitative, and blood cultures. Arch Intern Med 143:66–69Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weinstein RA, Emori TG, Anderson RL, Stamm WE (1976) Pressure transducers as a source of bacteremia after open heart surgery: report of an outbreak and guidelines for prevention. Chest 69:338–344Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Weinstein RA, Stamm WE, Kramer L, Corey L (1976) Pressure monitoring devices: overlooked source of nosocomial infection. JAMA 236:936–938Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Buxton AE, Anerson RL, Klimek J, Quintiliani R (1978) Failure of disposable domes to prevent septicemia acquired from contaminated pressure transducers. Chest 74:508–513Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Dryden GE; Brickler J (1979) Stopcock contamination. Anesth Analg 58: 141–142Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sitges-Serra A, Puig P, Linares J, Perez JL et al (1984) Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. JPEN 8:668–672Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Falchuk KH, Peterson L, McNeil BJ (1985) Microparticulate-induced phlebitis: its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med 312:78–82Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sitges-Serra A, Linares J, Perez JL, Jaurrieta E et al (1985) A randomized trial of the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. JPEN 9:322–325Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Band JD, Maki DG (1979) Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. Ann Intern Med 91:173–178Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gorbea HF, Snydman DR, Delaney A, Stockman J et al (1984) Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. JAMA 215:2112–2115Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Snydman DR, Donnelly-Reidy M, Perry LK, Martin WJ (1987) Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals. Infect Control 8:113–116Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Maki DG, Botticelli JT, LeRoy ML, Thielke TS (1987) Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. JAMA 258:1777–1781Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gertner J, Herman B, Pescio M, Wolff MA (1979) Risk of infection in prolonged central venous catheterization. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:567–570Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Snyder RH, Archer FJ, Endy T, Allen TW et al (1988) Catheter infection: a comparison of two catheter maintenance techniques. Ann Surg 208: 651–653Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG, Sable CA et al (1992) A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med 327:1062–1068Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Eyer S, Brummitt C, Carossley K, Siegel R et al (1990) Catheter-related sepsis: prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance. Crit Care Med 18: 1073–1079Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Newsome HH, Armstrong CW, Mayhall GC, Sugerman HJ et al (1984) Mechanical complications from insertion of subclavian venous feeding catheters: comparison of de novo percutaneous venipuncture to change of catheter over guidewire. JPEN 8: 560–562Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hagley MT, Martin B, Gast P, Traeger SM (1992) Infections and mechanical complications of central venous catheters placed by percutaneous venipuncture and over guidewires. Crit Care Med 20:1426–1430Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pettigrew RA, Lang SDR, Haydock DA, Parry BR et al (1985) Catheter-related sepsis in patients on intravenous nutrition: a prospective study of quantitative catheter cultures and guidewire changes for suspected sepsis. Br J Surg 72:52–55Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cercenado E, Ena J, Rodriguez-Crexems M, Romero I et al (1990) A conservative procedure for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Arch Intern Med 150:1417–1420Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. Reed
    • 1
  • C. N. Sessler
    • 1
  • F. L. Glauser
    • 1
  • B. A. Phelan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineMedical College of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations