Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 141, Issue 9, pp 1749–1758 | Cite as

Characterization of echovirus 22 variants

  • D. Schnurr
  • M. Dondero
  • D. Holland
  • J. Connor
Original Papers

Summary

Ten presumptive enterovirus isolates which could not be neutralized by type specific antisera to any prototype enterovirus were related to echovirus 22 using molecular, biologic and serologic methods. Viral protein fingerprinting and PCR first suggested that these strains were variants of echovirus 22. Three of the strains were echovirus 22 prime strains, i.e., antiserum made to the variant strain neutralized the variant and the prototype strain. The other strains were neutralized by antiserum to the prime strains. Unlike typical enteroviruses, echovirus 22 and 23 prototype viruses and 7 of the 10 variants were heat stable at 50 °C in H2O for 1 h.

Keywords

Infectious Disease Viral Protein Variant Strain Specific Antiserum Serologic Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chapman NM, Tracy S, Gauntt CJ, Fortmueller U (1990) Molecular detection and identification of enteroviruses using enzymatic amplification and nucleic acid hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 28: 843–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coller B, Chapman NM, Beck MA, Pallansch MA, Gauntt CJ, Tracy SM (1990) Echovirus 22 is an atypical enterovirus. J Virol 64: 2692–2701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connor JD, Walpita P (1989) Identification of herpes simplex viruses by automated profile analysis of viral proteins. J Virol Methods 24: 245–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrnst A, Eriksson M (1993) Epidemiological features of type 22 echovirus infection. Scand J Infect Dis 25: 278–281Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grandien M, Forsgren M, Ehrnst A (1989) Enteroviruses and reoviruses. In: Schmidt NJ, Emmons RW (eds) Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections, 6th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, p 521Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gwaltney JM, Colonno RJ, Hamparian VV, Turner RB (1989) Rhinoviruses. In: Schmidt NJ, Emmons RW (eds) Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections, 6th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, pp 602–603Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hyypia T, Horsnell C, Maaronen M, Kahn M, Kalkkinen N, Auvinen P, Kinnunen L, Stanway G (1992) A distinct picornavirus group identified by sequence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 8847–8851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rotbart HA (1990) Enzymatic RNA amplification of the enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol 28: 438–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt NJ, Lennette EH (1970) Antigenic variants of coxsackievirus type A24. Am J Epidemiol 91: 99–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmidt NJ, Lennette EH, Ho HH (1966) Observations on antigenic variants of echovirus type 11. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 123: 696–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt NJ, Lennette EH, Ho HH (1974) An apparently new enterovirus isolated from patients with disease of the central nervous system. J Infect Dis 129: 304–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shimizu C, Rambaud C, Cheron G, Rouzioux C, Lozinski GM, Rao A, Stanway G, Krous HF, Burns JC (1996) Molecular identification of viruses in sudden infant death associated with myocarditis and pericarditis. Ped Infect Dis (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stanway G, Kalkkinen N, Roivainen M, Ghazi F, Khan M, Smyth M, Meurman O, Hyypia T (1994) Molecular and biologic characteristics of echovirus 22, a representative of a new picornavirus group. J Virol 68: 8232–8238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wallis C, Melnick JL (1962) Cationic stabilization — a new property of enteroviruses. Virology 16: 504–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walpita P, Connor JD, Pfeifer D (1988) Protein fingerprinting: a novel virus identification system. J Virol Methods 24: 315–324Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Schnurr
    • 1
  • M. Dondero
    • 1
  • D. Holland
    • 2
  • J. Connor
    • 2
  1. 1.Viral and Rickettsial Disease LaboratoryCalifornia Department of Health ServicesBerkeley
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations