Klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 60, Issue 14, pp 749–751

In vivo microscopic studies of the responses of the liver to endotoxin

  • Robert S. McCuskey
  • Renate Urbaschek
  • Patricia A. McCuskey
  • Bernhard Urbaschek
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Summary

In vivo microscopic methods concomitant with electron microscopic and histochemical procedures are being used to explore the sequelae of responses of Kupffer cells and the hepatic microvasculature to endotoxins. To gain further insight into the role of the liver in host defense and nonspecific resistance, the effects of endotoxin also are being studied in animals sensitized to endotoxin (BCG infection) or tolerant to endotoxin (pretreated with detoxified endotoxin, low doses of endotoxin, or in C3H/HeJ mice). The results to date, have demonstrated that endotoxin induces significant alterations in the hepatic microcirculation due to swelling of Kupffer and endothelial cells and the adhesion of leukocytes and platelets to the sinusoid wall. Lymphocytes frequently are associated with the Kupffer cells. Phagocytosis also is affected; following a brief period of stimulation, the rate of phagocytosis by Kupffer cells is depressed. In BCG infected animals all of these responses are exaggerated but can be minimized by pretreatment with detoxified endotoxin or minute concentrations of endotoxin 24 h prior to the challenge dose of endotoxin. The responses are not seen in the endotoxin low-responder, C3H/HeJ mouse which was found to have a deficiency in lysosomal enzymes and a paucity of functional Kupffer cells. The results provide some insight into the sequelae of cellular and microvascular events that occur in the liver during endotoxemia, endotoxin-related host defense mechanisms and non-specific resistance. In addition, support is provided for the central role of Kupffer cells in these events and that lysosomal enzymes participate in the toxic response elicited by endotoxin.

Key words

Kupffer cells Endotoxin Microcirculation Liver 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhatnagar R, Schirmer R, Ernst M, Decker K (1981) Superoxide release by zymosan-stimulated rat Kupffer cells in vitro. Eur J Biochem 119:171–175Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloch EH, McCuskey RS (1977) Biodynamics of phagocytosis: An analysis of the dynamics of phagocytosis in the liver by in vivo microscopy. In: Wisse E, Knook DL (eds) Kupffer Cells and Other Sinusoidal Cells, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cilento EV, Reilly FD, McCuskey RS (1981) Quantification of volumetric flow within segments of the hepatic microvasculature following norepinephrine administration. Microvasc Res 21:239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurland JI, Bockmann R (1978) Prostaglandin E production by human monocytes and mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Exp Med 147:952–957Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathison JC, Ulevitch R (1979) The clearance, tissue distribution, and cellular localization of intravenously injected lipopolysaccharide in rabbits. J Immunol 123:2133–2143Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCuskey RS (1981) In vivo microscopy of internal organs. Prog Clin Biol Res 59B:79–87Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCuskey RS (1981) In vivo microscopy of the liver and phagocytosis of latex particles by Kupffer cells. Anat Rec 199:167AGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCuskey RS, Reilly FD, McCuskey PA, Dimlich RVW (1978) “In vivo” microscopic studies of the hepatic microvascular system. Biblioth Anat 18:73–76Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCuskey RS, Urbaschek R, McCuskey PA, Sacco N, Stauber W, Pinkstaff C, Urbaschek B (1982) Studies of the liver in the C3H/HeJ mouse. Anat Rec 202:123AGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCuskey RS, Urbaschek R, McCuskey PA, Sacco N, Stauber WT, Pinkstaff CA, Urbaschek B (1982) Deficient hepatic phagocytosis and lysosomal enzymes in the low endotoxin-responder, C3H/HeJ mouse. Infect Immun (submitted)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCuskey RS, Urbaschek R, McCuskey PA, Urbaschek B (1982) In vivo microscopic responses of the liver to endotoxin and BCG alone and in combination. Infect Immun (submitted)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munford RS (1978) Endotoxins and the liver. Gastroenterology 75:532–535Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nolan JP (1975) The role of endotoxin in liver injury. Gastroenterology 69:1346–1356Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pabst MJ, Johnston RB (1980) Increased production of superoxide anion by macrophages exposed in vitro to muramyl dipeptide or lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med 151:101–114Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parant MA, Parant FJ, Chedid LA (1980) Enhancement of resistance to infections by endotoxin-induced serum factor from Mycobacterium bovis BCG-infected mice. Infect Immun 28:654–659Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Praaning-Van Dalen DP, Brouwer A, Knook DL (1981) Clearance capacity of rat liver Kupffer, endothelial and parenchymal cells. Gastroenterology (in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reilly FD, McCuskey RS, Cilento EV (1981) Hepatic microvascular regulatory mechanisms. I. Adrenergic mechanisms. Microvasc Res 21:103–116Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reilly FD, Dimlich RVW, Cilento EV, McCuskey RS (1981) Hepatic microvascular regulatory mechanisms. II. Cholinergic mechanisms. Hepatology (in press)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenstreich DL, Vogel SN (1980) The central role of macrophages in endotoxin reactions. In: Schlessinger D (ed) Microbiology. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 11–38Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruiter DJ, van der Meulen J, Brouwer A, Hummel MJR, Mauer BJ, van der Ploeg JCM, Wisse E (1981) Uptake by liver cells of endotoxin following its intravenous injection. Lab Invest 45:38–45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Urbaschek B, Nowotny A (1968) Endotoxin tolerance induced by detoxified endotoxin (endotoxoid). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 127:650–652Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Urbaschek B, Urbaschek R (1979) The inflammatory response to endotoxins. Biblioth Anat 17:74–104Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Urbaschek R, McCuskey RS, McCuskey PA, Urbaschek B (1982) Endotoxin-induced humoral factors involved in increased non-specific resistance. 9th Internat RES Congress Davos, (Abstract)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vogel SN, Moore RN, Sipe JD, Rosenstreich DL (1980) BCG-induced enhancement of endotoxin sensitivity in C3H/HeJ mice. J Immun 124:2004–2009Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wahl LM, Ohlsen CE, Sandberg AL, Mergenhagen SE (1977) Prostaglandin regulation of macrophage collagenase production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74:4955–4958Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert S. McCuskey
    • 1
  • Renate Urbaschek
    • 2
  • Patricia A. McCuskey
    • 1
  • Bernhard Urbaschek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyWest Virginia University Medical CenterMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Abteilung für Immunologie und Serologie, Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Klinikum MannheimUniversität HeidelbergMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations