Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 16–27 | Cite as

The nature of managerial work roles in Malaysian public enterprises

  • A. R. M. Zabid
Articles

Abstract

This paper examines the work roles of public enterprise managers, the classifications of the work roles, and the importance of the work roles across hierarchical levels, functional speciality, business sector and the size of the organisation, based on Mintzberg's framework of managerial roles. The result showed that 105 managers ranked the role of entrepreneur as most important and the role of spokesman as most unimportant in performing their jobs. The principal component solution resulted in three interpretable categories of work roles: internal roles; external roles, and internal-external roles. There were also variations in work role importance across hierarchical levels, functional speciality, business sector and size of the organisation. Implications for further research and management practice are also presented.

Keywords

Management Practice Hierarchical Level Managerial Work Work Role Business Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, P., “Managers at Work: A Large Scale Study of the Managerial Job in New York City Government,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, 1983, pp. 613–619.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, L.D., “The Effect Level in the Hierarchy and Functional Area have on the extent Mintzberg Roles are Required by Managerial Jobs,”Academy of Management Proceedings, 1979, pp. 186–189.Google Scholar
  3. Anastassopoulos, J.P. and P. Larcon, Paris: Patronat. 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Chitayat, G., “The Effectiveness of Board of Directors in Israeli State-Owned Companies,”Management International Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, 1980, pp. 94–110.Google Scholar
  5. Choran, I., “The Manager of a Small Company”, Unpublished MBA thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Fayol, H.,Administration Industrielle et Generale, Paris: Dunad, 1916.Google Scholar
  7. Hafsi, T.,Enterprise Publique et Politique Industrielle Paris: McGraw Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Lachman, R., “Public and Private Sector Differences: CEO's Perceptions of Their Role Environments”,Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 3, 1985, pp. 671–678.Google Scholar
  9. Lau, A.W., A.R. Newman and L.A. Broedling, “The Nature of Managerial Work in the Public Sector,”Public Administration Review, Vol. 40, 1980, pp. 513–520.Google Scholar
  10. Lau, A.W., C.M. Pavett and A.R. Newman, “The Nature of Managerial Work: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Jobs”,Academy of Management Proceedings, 1980, pp. 339–343.Google Scholar
  11. Lynn Jr., L.E.,Managing the Public's Business, New York: Basic Books, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Mintzberg, H.,The Nature of Managerial Work, New York: Harper and Row, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Paolillo, Joseph G.P., “Role Profiles for Managers at Different Hierarchical Levels”,Academy of Management Proceedings, 1980, pp. 91–94.Google Scholar
  14. Paolillo, Joseph G.P., “The Managers' Self-Assessment of Managerial Roles: Small vs Large Firms”,American Journal of Small Business, Vol. 111 No. 3, Jan–March 1984, pp. 58–64.Google Scholar
  15. Pavett, C.M. and A.W. Lau, “Managerial Work: The Influence of Hierarchical Level and Functional Speciality,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, March 1983, pp. 170–177.Google Scholar
  16. Pavett, C.M. and A.W. Lau, “A comparative analysis of research and development managerial jobs across two sectors,”Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 22 No. 1, 1985, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
  17. Shapira, Z. and R.L.M. Dunbar, “Testing Mintzberg's Managerial, Roles Classification Using an In-basket Simulation,”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65 No. 1, 1980, pp. 87–95.Google Scholar
  18. Stieglitz, H., “The Chief Executive's Job and Size of the Company,” The Conference Board Record, 7 Sept. 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Synder, N.H. and T.L. Wheelen, “Managerial Roles: Mintzberg and the Management Process theorist,”Academy of Management Proceedings, 1981, pp. 249–253.Google Scholar
  20. Walters, K. and J. Monseen, “State-owned enterprises abroad: New competitive threat”,Harvard Business Review, 1979, pp. 160–170.Google Scholar
  21. Walters, K. and Monsen, “Managing the nationalised company,”California Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 4, Summer 1983, pp. 16–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© School of Management National University of Singapore 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. M. Zabid
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management Studies, Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversiti Pertanian MalaysiaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations