Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 11, pp 871–879 | Cite as

Respiratory response and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients

  • S. Nava
  • C. Bruschi
  • F. Rubini
  • A. Palo
  • G. Iotti
  • A. Braschi
Original

Abstract

Objective

Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) is now widely used in the process of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various levels of PS on respiratory pattern and diaphragmatic efforts in patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Setting

Intermediate intensive care unit.

Patients

We studied ten patients undergoing PSV and recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure due to exacerbation of COPD.

Methods

Three levels of PSV were studied, starting from the lowest (PSb) one at which it was possible to obtain an adequate Vt with a pH≥7.32 and an SaO2>93%. Then, PS was set at 5 cmH2O above (PSb+5) and below (PSb-5) this starting level. Ventilatory pattern, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi), the integrated EMG of the diaphragm, static PEEP (PEEPi, stat), dynamic PEEP (PEEPi, dyn), and the static compliance and resistance of the total respiratory system were recorded.

Results

Minute ventilation did not significantly change with variations in the level of PS, while Vt significantly increased with PS (PS−5=6.3±0.5 ml/kg vs. PSb=10.1±0.9 [p<0.01] and vs. PS+5=11.7±0.6 [p<0.01]), producing a reduction in respiratory frequency with longer expiratory time. The best values of blood gases were obtained at PSb, while at PSb−5, PaCO2 markedly increased. During PSb and PSb+5 and to a lesser extent during PSb−5, most of the patients made several inspiratory efforts that were not efficient enough to trigger the ventilator to inspire; thus, the PTPdi “wasted” during these inefficient efforts was increased, especially during PS+5. The application of an external PEEP (PEEPe) of 75% of the static intrinsic PEEP during PSb caused a significant reduction in the occurrence of these inefficient efforts (p<0.05). Minute ventilation remained constant, but Vt decreased, together with Te, leaving the blood gases unaltered. The PTPdi per breath and the dynamic PEEPi were also significantly reduced (by 59% and 31% of control, respectively,p<0.001) with the application of PEEPe.

Conclusion

We conclude that in COPD patients, different levels of PSV may induce different respiratory patterns and gas exchange. PS levels capable of obtaining a satisfactory equilibrium in blood gases may result in ineffective respiratory efforts if external PEEP is not applied. The addition of PEEPe, not exceeding dynamic intrinsic PEEP, may also reduce the metabolic work of the diaphragm without altering gas exchange.

Key words

PSV Inefficient efforts COPD Edi PTPdi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brochard L, Pleskwa F, Lemaire F (1987) Improved efficacy of spontaneous breathing with inspiratory pressure support. Am Rev Respir Dis 136: 411–415Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F (1989) Inspiratory pressure support prevents diaphragmatic fatigue during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 139:513–521Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacIntyre NR, Leatherman NE (1990) Ventilatory muscle loads, and the frequency-tidal volume pattern during inspiratory pressure-assisted (pressure-supported) ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:327–331Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marini JJ (1986) Exertion during ventilator support: how much and how important? Respir Care 31:385–387Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun NMT, Faulkner J, Hughes RL, Roussos C, Sahgal V (1983) When should respiratory muscles be exercised? Chest 84:76–84Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kimura T, Takezawa J, Nishiwaki K, Shimada Y (1991) Determination of the optimal pressure support level evaluated by measuring transdiaphragmatic pressure. Chest 100:112–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McIntyre NR, Nishimura M, Usada Y, Tokioka H, Takezawa J, Shimada Y (1990) The Nagoya conference on system design and patient-ventilator interactions during pressure support ventilation. Chest 97:1463–1466Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:166–170Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marini JJ (1989) Should PEEP be used in airflow obstruction? Am Rev Respir Dis 140:1–3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Field S, Grassino A, Sanci S (1984) Respiratory muscle oxygen consumption estimated by the diaphragm pressure-time index. J Appl Physiol 57:44–51Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Avalli L, Rossi F, Bombino M (1987) Pressure-volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:730–736Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ranieri MV, Eissa NT, Corbeil C, Chasse M, Braidy J, Matar N, Milic-Emili J (1991) Effects of PEEP on alveolar recruitment and gas exchange in ARDS patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:544–551Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milic-Emili J, Mead JJ, Turner JD, Glauser FM (1964) Improved technique for studying pleural pressure from esophageal balloons. J Appl Physiol 13:207–211Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger MJ, Milic-Emili J (1982) A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:788–791Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petrof BJ, Legare M, Goldberg P, Milic-Emili J, Gottfried SB (1990) Continuous positive airway pressure reduces work of breathing and dyspnea during weaning from mechanical ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:281–289Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rochester DF, Bettini G (1976) Diaphragmatic blood flow and energy expenditure in the dog: effects of inspiratory airflow resistance and hypercapnia. J Clin Invest 57:661–672Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whitelaw WA, Derenne JP, Milic-Emili J (1975) Occlusion pressure as a measure of respiratory center output in conscious man. Respir Physiol 23:181–199Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stradling JR, Chadwick GA, Quirk C, Phillips T (1985) Respiratory inductance plethysmography: calibration, techniques, their validation and the effects of posture. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 21:317–324Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rossi A, Gottfried SB, Zocchi L, Higgs BD, Lennos S, Calverley PMA, Begin P, Grassino A, Milic-Emili J (1985) Measurement of static compliance of the total respiratory system in patients with acute respiratory failure during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:672–677Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bates JHT, Rossi A, Milic-Emili J (1985) Analysis of the behaviour of the respiratory system with constant inspiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 64: 441–450Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rubini F, Rampulla C, Nava S (1994) Acute effect of corticosteroids on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic airflow obstruction and aucte respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:306–310Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kochi T, Okubo S, Zin WA, Milic-Emili J (1986) Flow and volume dependence of pulmonary mechanics in anesthetized cats. J Appl Physiol 64:441–450Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fernandez R, Benito S, Blanch L, Net A (1988) Intrinsic PEEP: a cause of inspiratory muscle ineffectivity. Intensive Care Med 15:51–52Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ranieri M, Giuliani R, Cinella G, Pesce C, Brienza N, Ippolito EL, Pomo V, Fiore T, Gottfried SB, Brienza A (1993) Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during acute ventilatory failure and controlled mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:5–13Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernandez Mondejar E, Vazquez Mata G, Navarrette Navarro P, Rivera Fernandez R, Torres Ruiz JM, Carazo E (1992) Increase in lung volume originated by extrinsic PEEP in patients with auto-PEEP. Intensive Care Med 18: 269–273Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Armitage P (1980) Statistical methods in medical research. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MacIntyre NR (1986) Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation. Chest 89:677–686Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prakash O, Meij S (1985) Cardiopulmonary response to inspiratory pressure support during spontaneous ventilation vs. conventional ventilation. Chest 88:403–408Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tuxen DV (1989) Detrimental effects of positive end-expiratory pressure during controlled mechanical ventilation of patients with severe airflow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:5–9Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martin JG, Shore S, Engle LA (1982) Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on respiratory mechanics and pattern of breathing in induced asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:812–817Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Widdicombe J (1963) Reflex effects of lung inflation in tracheal volume. J Appl Physiol 18:681–686Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petrof BJ, Calderini E, Gottfried S (1990) Effect of CPAP on respiratory effort and dyspnea during exercise in severe COPD. J Appl Physiol 69:179–188Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Nava
    • 1
  • C. Bruschi
    • 1
  • F. Rubini
    • 1
  • A. Palo
    • 2
  • G. Iotti
    • 2
  • A. Braschi
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of PneumologyCentro Medico di Riabilitazione di MontescanoMontescano (PV)Italy
  2. 2.Servizio di Rianimazione I, Ospedale S. MatteoIRCCSPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations