Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 1379–1384 | Cite as

Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients

  • X. Badia
  • A. Díaz-Prieto
  • M. Rué
  • D. L. Patrick
Original

Abstract

Objective

a) to examine the EuroQol instrument's ability to assess a patient's state of health prior to admission to an ICU; b) to describe a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before the onset of the condition leading to admission to the ICU, and prior to discharge; c) to compare patients' preferences for a “common core” of EuroQol health states with preferences from healthy individuals.

Design

Patients in a step-down unit (SDU) retrospectively rated their health states prior to admission to the ICU, their current states of health and the “common core” of hypothetical EuroQol states of health. Proxies rated the patients' health states prior to admission to the ICU. Patients' preferences for EuroQol states of health were compared with the preferences obtained from a retrospective cohort of healthy individuals.

Setting

An SDU at the University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.

Patients

103 critical medical and surgical patients were interviewed.

Intervention

The EuroQol questionnaire, a non-disease specific instrument to evaluate HR QoL.

Measurements and main results

Agreement between patients and proxies regarding their prior health state was moderate to good in physical and pain areas (kappa: 0.43–0.58), fair for mood (kappa: 0.38) and almost identical for prior overall health (65.9 vs 66.3). Compared with their prior HRQoL, patients had deteriorated in all physical areas and overall health at discharge from the SDU. Preferences for the worst health states varied significantly between patients and healthy individuals.

Conclusion

The EuroQol can be reliably used with proxies to determine the state of health of patients prior to admission to the ICU. Preferences between healthy individuals and ICU patients differed.

Key words

Preferences Proxy responses EuroQol Health status measurement Quality of life Critical patients 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thibault GE, Mulley AG, Barnett GO, et al. (1980) Medical intensive care: indications, interventions, and outcomes. N Engl J Med 302: 938–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knaus WA, Zimmermann JE, Wagner DP, et al. (1981) APACHE — acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9: 591–597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovich A, et al. (1984) A simplified acute physiologic score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12: 975–977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, et al. (1985) A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights. Crit Care Med 13: 519–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lemeshow S, Teres D, Avrunin JS, et al. (1987) A comparison of methods to predict mortality of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 15: 715–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knaus WA, Drapper EA, Wagner DP, et al. (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13: 818–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA. (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100: 1619–1636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, et al. (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270: 2478–2486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270: 2957–2963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Gall JR, Brun-Buisson C, Trunet P, et al. (1982) Influence of age, previous health status and severity of acute illness on outcome from intensive care. Crit Care Med 10: 575–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patrick DL, Danis M, Sutherland LI, et al. (1988) Quality of life following intensive care. J Gen Intern Med 3: 218–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vazquez-Mata G, Rivera R, Gonzalez A, et al. (1992) Factors related to quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 20: 1257–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tian ZM, Reis-Miranda D (1995) Quality of life after intensive care with Sickness Impact Profile. Int Care Med 21: 422–428Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldstein RL, Campion EW, Thibault GE, et al. (1986) Functional outcomes following medical intensive care. Crit Care Med 14: 783–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaren B, Hedstrand U (1987) Quality of life among long-term survivors of intensive care. Crit Care Med 15: 743–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobs CJ, Van der Vliet JA, Van Roogendaal MT, et al. (1988) Mortality and quality of life after intensive care for critical illness. Intensive Care Med 14: 217–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mundt DJ, Gage RW, Lemeshow S, et al. (1989) Intensive care unit patient follow-up. Mortality, functional status and return to work at six months. Arch Inten Med 149: 68–72Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sage WM, Rosenthal MH, Silverman JF (1986) intensive care worth it? An assessment of input and outcome for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 14: 777–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yinnon A, Zimran A, Hershko C (1989) Quality of life and survival following intensive medical care. Quarterly J Med 71: 347–357Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK (1992) The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 45: 743–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magazmier J, Simonsick EM, Kashner M, et al. (1988) Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J Clin Epidemiol 41: 1065–1074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clarridge BR, Massagli MP (1989) The use of female spouse proxies in common symptom reporting. Med Care 27: 352–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Danis M, Patrick D, Sutherland LI, et al. (1988) Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care. JAMA 260: 797–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosser RM, Kind P (1978) A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol 7: 347–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Badia X, Fernandez E, Segura A (1995) Influence of socio-demographic and health status variables on evaluation of health states in a Spanish population. Eur J Pub Health 5: 87–93Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brooks RG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, et al. (1991) EuroQol: health-related quali ty of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy 18: 37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199–208Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams A (1995) The role of the EuroQol instrument in QALY calculations. Discussion paper No. 130. University of York: Centre for Health Economics, 1995Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edition). Wiley, New York, pp 221–225Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA, et al. (1991) The validity of proxygenerated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care 29: 115–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nord E (1992) Methods for Quality Adjustment of Life Years. Soc Sci Med 34: 559–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsevat J, Cook E, Green M, et al. (1995) Health values of the seriously ill. Ann Intern Med 122: 514–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC et al. (1994) Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 14: 9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guadagnoli E, Cleary PD (1995) How consistent is patient reported pre-admission health status when collected during and after hospital stay? Med Care 33: 106–112PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. Badia
    • 1
  • A. Díaz-Prieto
    • 2
  • M. Rué
    • 3
  • D. L. Patrick
    • 4
  1. 1.Institut de Salut Pública de Catalunya, Pavelló Central, Campus de BellvitgeUniversitat de Barcelona, Carretera de la Feixa Llarga, s/nBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Carretera de la Feixa Llarge, S/MHospital Universitari de BellvitgeBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Consorci Hospitalari Parc TauliHospital de, Sabadell, Parc Taulí, S/MSábadell, BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, F-346 Health Sciences Center, SC-37University of WashingtonSeattle(US)

Personalised recommendations