Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Clinical evaluation of diminished early expiratory flow (DEEF) ventilation in mechanically ventilated COPD patients

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the cardiopulmonary effects, especially the end-expiratory lung volume (EEV) and ventilation inhomogeneity during diminished early expiratory flow ventilation (DEEF), which resembles pursed-lips breathing, with the conventional intermitent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design

A prospective study measuring cardiopulmonary parameters during IPPV, DEEF, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) as a control mode. In the PEEP mode, PEEP values were chosen such that the mean airway pressure during a breath cycle was equal to that during the DEEF mode, which was higher than the conventional IPPV mode.

Setting

Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Patients

20 postoperative mechanically ventilated COPD patients who were optimally pretreated and had normal blood oxygenation.

Interventions

Measurements were started in the IPPV (IPPV1) mode, continued in a randomized order with DEEF or PEEP, and completed with a second IPPV (IPPV2) mode, with 1 h equilibration time in each mode before each measurement.

Measurements and results

A multi-breath indicator gas wash-out test was used to calculate the EEV and ventilation inhomogeneity. There was a 9% increase (p<0.05) in the mean EEV during both the DEEF and PEEP mode compared to IPPV. No significant changes in the ventilation inhomogeneity and deadspace fractions or the hemodynamic parameters were found during the different ventilatory modes.

Conclusions

There was no improvement in pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters during the DEEF mode in comparison to the IPPV mode. The small increase in EEV during DEEF was probably caused by the slightly higher mean expiratory pressures as in the PEEP mode. However, this had no effect on the hemodynamic parameters. As we could not observe any improvement with the DEEF ventilation in our optimally pretreated postoperative COPD patients, we do not advise applying this therapy in this group of patients, since this mode of ventilation may cause barotrauma if not monitored adequately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Schmidt RW, Wasserman K, Lillington GA (1964) The effort of airflow and oral pressure on the mechanics of breathing in patients with asthma and emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 90:564–571

  2. 2.

    Thoman RL, Stoker GL, Ross JC (1966) The efficacy of pursed lips breathing in patients with COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 93:100–106

  3. 3.

    Ingram RH, Schilder DP (1967) Effect of pursed lips expiration on the pulmonary pressure-volume relationship in obstructive lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 96:381–388

  4. 4.

    Miller WF (1958) Physical therapeutic measures in the treatment of chronic bronchopulmonary disorders. Methods for breathing training. Am J Med 24:929–940

  5. 5.

    Barach AL (1973) Physiological advantages of grunting, groaning and pursed lips breathing: adaptive symptoms related to the development of continuous positive pressure breathing. Bull NY Acad Med 49:666–673

  6. 6.

    Barach AL (1938–1939) Physiological methods in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma and emphysema. Ann Intern Med 12:454–481

  7. 7.

    Barach AL, Swenson P (1939) Effect of breathing gases under positive pressure on lumens of small and medium-sized bronchi. Arch Intern Med 63:946–948

  8. 8.

    Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK (1971) The treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 284:1333–1340

  9. 9.

    Tuxen D (1989) Detrimental effects of positive end-expiratory pressure during controlled mechanical ventilation of patients with severe airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 140:5–9

  10. 10.

    Huygen PEM, Gültuna I, Ince C, Zwart A, Bogaard JM, Feenstra BWA, Bruining HA (1993) A new ventilation inhomogeneity index from multiple breath indicator gas washout tests in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 21:1149–1158

  11. 11.

    Huygen PEM, Feenstra BWA, Hoorn E, Jansen JRC, Zwart A (1991) PDPS: Pulmonary Data Processing System for assessment of gas exchange properties by multiple gas washout. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 36:223–235

  12. 12.

    American Thoracic Society (1987) Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 136:225–243

  13. 13.

    Huygen PEM, Feenstra BWA, Holland WPJ, Ince C, Stam H, Bruining HA (1990) Design and validation of an indicator gas injector for multiple gas washout tests in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 18:754–758

  14. 14.

    Zwart A, Jansen JRC, Luijendijk SCM (1982) Bohr dead space during helium washout. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 18:261–272

  15. 15.

    Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Bogaard JM, van Rooyen W, Versprille A (1981) Thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output during artificial ventilation. J Appl Physiol 50:584–591

  16. 16.

    Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Settels JJ, Kloek JJ, Versprille A (1990) An adequate strategy for the thermodilution technique in patients during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 16:422–425

  17. 17.

    Mueller RE, Petty TL, Filley GF (1970) Ventilation and arterial bloodgas changes induced by pursed lips breathing. J Appl Physiol 28:784–789

  18. 18.

    Mead J, Turner JM, Macklem PT, Little JB (1967) Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 22:95–108

  19. 19.

    Pride NB (1971) The assessment of airflow obstruction. Role of measurements of airway resistance and of tests of forced expiration. Br J Dis Chest 65:135–169

  20. 20.

    Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction. The auto-PEEP effect. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 126:166–170

  21. 21.

    Hubmayr RD, Gay PC, Tayyab M (1987) Respiratory system mechanics in ventilated patients: techniques and indications. Mayo Clin Proc 62:358–368

  22. 22.

    Berg vd B, Stam H, Bogaard JM (1991) Effects of PEEP on respiratory mechanics in patients with COPD on mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 4:561–567

  23. 23.

    Falke KJ, Pontoppidan H, Kumar A, Leith DE, Geffin B, Laver MB (1972) Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. J Clin Invest 51:2315–2323

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to I. Gültuna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gültuna, I., Huygen, P.E.M., Ince, C. et al. Clinical evaluation of diminished early expiratory flow (DEEF) ventilation in mechanically ventilated COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 22, 539–545 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708093

Download citation

Key words

  • Diminished early expiratory flow
  • End-expiratory lung volume
  • COPD
  • Wash-out test
  • Pursed lips breathing
  • Ventilation inhomogeneity