Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 302–309 | Cite as

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: Incidence, morbidities and outcomes in surgical ICU patients

  • D. Pittet
  • S. Rangel-Frausto
  • N. Li
  • D. Tarara
  • M. Costigan
  • L. Rempe
  • P. Jebson
  • R. P. Wenzel
Original

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and severe sepsis in surgical ICU patients and define patient characteristics associated with their acquisition and outcome.

Design

One-month prospective study of critically ill patients with a 28 day in-hospital follow up.

Setting

Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at a tertiary care institution.

Methods

All patients (n=170) admitted to the SICU between April 1 and April 30, 1992 were prospectively followed for 28 days. Daily surveillance was performed by two dedicated, specifically-trained research nurses. Medical and nursing chart reviews were performed, and follow up information at six and twelve months was obtained.

Results

The in-hospital surveillance represented 2246 patient-days, including 658 ICU patient-days. Overall, 158 patients (93%) had SIRS for an incidence of 542 episodes/1000 patients-days. The incidence of SIRS in the ICU was even higher (840 episodes/1000 patients-days). A total of 83 patients (49%) had sepsis; among them 28 developed severe sepsis. Importantly, 13 patients had severe sepsis after discharge from the ICU. Patient groups were comparable with respect to age, sex ratio, and type of surgery performed. Apach II score on admission to the ICU and ASA score at time of surgery were significantly higher (p<0.05) only for patients who subsequently developed severe sepsis. The crude mortality at 28 days was 8.2% (14/170); it markedly differed among patient groups: 6% for those with SIRS vs. 35% for patients with severe sepsis. Patients with sepsis and severe sepsis had a longer mean length of ICU stay (2.1±0.2 and 7.5±1.5, respectively) than those with SIRS (1.45±0.1) or control patients (1.16±0.1). Total length of hospital stay also markedly differed among groups (35±9 (severe sepsis), 24±2 (sepsis), 11±0.8 (SIRS), and 9±0.1 (controls, respectively).

Conclusions

Almost everyone in the SICU had SIRS. Therefore, because of its poor specificity, SIRS was not helpful predicting severe sepsis and septic shock. Patients who developed sepsis or severe sepsis had higher crude mortality and length of stay than those who did not. Studies designed to identify those who develop complications of SIRS would be very useful.

Key words

Sepsis Critically ill Septic shock Mortality Systemic inflammatory response syndrome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pittet D, Herwaldt LA, Massanari RM (1992) The intensive care unit. In: Brachman PS, Bennett JV (eds) Hospital infections. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA, pp 405–439Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donowitz LG (1986) High risk of nosocomial infection in the pediatric critical care patient. Crit Care Med 14:26–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daschner FD, Frey P, Wolff G, Baumann PC, Suter P (1982) Nosocomial infections in intensive care wards: a multicenter prospective study. Intensive Care Med 8:5–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP (1994) Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 271:1598–1601Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duggan JM, Oldfield GS, Ghosh HK (1985) Septicaemia as a hospital hazard. J Hosp Infect 6:406–412Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bone RC, Fischer CJ Jr, Clemmer TP, Slotman GJ, Metz CA, Balk RA (1989) Sepsis syndrome: a valid clinical entity. Crit Care Med 17:389–393Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziegler EJ, Fisher CJ Jr, Sprung CL, Straube RC, Sadoff JC, Foulke GE, Wortel CH, Fink MP, Dellinger RP, Teng NNH, Allen IE, Berger HJ, Knatterud GL, LoBuglio AF, Smith CR (1991) Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1 A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med 324:429–436Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenman RL, Schein RMH, Martin MA, Wenzel RP, MacIntyre NR, Emmanuel G, Chmel H, Kohler RB, McCarthy M, Plouffe J, Russell JA (1991) A controlled clinical trial of E5 murine monoclonal IgM antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis. JAMA 266:1097–1102Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American College of Chest Physicians/society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20:864–874Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Apache II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCabe WR, Jackson GG (1962) Gram-negative bacteremia. I. Etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med 110:847–855Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hebert PC, Drummond AJ, Singer JS, Bernard GR, Russel JA (1993) A simple multiple system organ failure scoring system predicts mortality of patients who have sepsis syndrome. Chest 104:230–235Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bone RC (1992) Toward an epidemiology and natural history of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). JAMA 268:3452–3455Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bone RC, Fisher CJ Jr, Clemmer TP et al (1987) A controlled clinical trial of high dose methylprednisolone in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 317:653–658Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group (1987) Effect of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy on mortality in patients with clinical signs of systemic shock. N Engl J Med 317:659–665Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Pittet
    • 1
  • S. Rangel-Frausto
    • 1
  • N. Li
    • 2
  • D. Tarara
    • 1
  • M. Costigan
    • 1
  • L. Rempe
    • 3
  • P. Jebson
    • 3
  • R. P. Wenzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Health Services ResearchUniversity of Iowa College of MedicineIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Biostatistics, Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Iowa College of MedicineIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Division of Intensive Care, Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Iowa College of MedicineIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations